Concept explainers
Compare the true and engineering strain energy density, the strain energy absorbed in natural rubber and energy stored in steel specimen.
Answer to Problem 6.5P
The true and engineering strain energy density is 1.6 times the engineering strain density for natural rubber and the strain energy absorbed in natural rubber and energy stored in steel specimen have a huge difference because rubber can strain more and can store more energy inside it due to application of force on it.
Explanation of Solution
Given:
Engineering strain is
Write the expression for engineering secant elastic moduli of natural rubber.
Here,
Write the expression for true secant elastic moduli of natural rubber.
Here,
Write the expression for engineering strain energy absorbed in natural rubber.
Here,
Write the expression for true strain energy absorbed in natural rubber.
Here,
Refer to Example 6.2, the engineering stress for natural rubber is
Substitute
Refer to Example 6.2, the true stress for natural rubber is
Substitute
Substitute
Substitute
The true strain energy absorbed by natural rubber is 1.6 times the engineering strain energy absorbed by natural rubber. The variation in values indicates the difference in measurement through theoretical and practical approach.
Refer to example 6.5, the value of strain energy for steel specimen is
Thus, the true and engineering strain energy density is 1.6 times the engineering strain density for natural rubber and the strain energy absorbed in natural rubber and energy stored in steel specimen have a huge difference because rubber can strain more and can store more energy inside it due to application of force on it.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Materials Science And Engineering Properties
- Compare the engineering and true secant elastic moduli for the natural rubber in Example Problem 6.2 at an engineering strain of 6.0. Assume that the deformation is all elastic.arrow_forwardA bronze rod is rigidly attached between an aluminum rod and a steel rod as shown in the figure below. Axial loads are applied at the positions indicated. a) Find the maximum value of P that will not exceed a stress in steel of 140 MPa, in bronze of 100 MPa, or in aluminum of 90 MPa. b) Determine the deformation of the bronze rod if the value of P is 22.50 KN. The moduli of elasticity are 200 GPa for steel, 80 GPa for bronze and 70 GPa for aluminum.arrow_forwardPROBLEM 4: As shown in the diagram shown, there is a gap of 0.5 mm between the rods at 10°C. Determine the stress in each rod if the temperature is raised to 150°C. The properties of each material are shown in the diagram. 0.5 mm FINAL ANSWERS 300 mm -250 mm MPa O alum O steel MPа Aluminum Stainless steel A = 2000 mm2 E = 75 GPa a = 23 × 10-6°C A = 800 mm? E = 190 GPa 17.3 x 10-6/°Carrow_forward
- The composite bar of neglible mass is connected to two rods as shown in the figure. If the system is initially free, determine the temperature change that will cause a tensile stress of 60 Mpa in the steel rod.arrow_forward1.17 Figure P1.17 shows the stress-strain relations of metals A and B during tension tests until fracture. Determine the following for the two metals (show all calcu- lations and units): a. Proportional limit b. Yield stress at an offset strain of 0.002 in./in. 150 - - Metal A 100 • Metal B 50 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 Strain, in./in. FIGURE P1.17 c. Ultimate strength d. Modulus of resilience e. Toughness f. Which metal is more ductile? Why? Stress, ksiarrow_forward
- Materials Science And Engineering PropertiesCivil EngineeringISBN:9781111988609Author:Charles GilmorePublisher:Cengage Learning