Why it is hard to detect the planetary systems of other stars.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 45E

To determine

Why it is hard to detect the planetary systems of other stars.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Which statement is most logical? a First stars are thought to have been more massive than Sun because the materials used to make clouds were more abundant at the beginning b First stars are thought to have been more massive than Sun because the temperatures of the clouds that made them were higher because they consisted entirely of hydrogen and helium c First stars are thought to have been more massive than Sun because star-forming clouds were much denser early in time d First stars are thought to have been more massive than Sun because the clouds that made them were much more massive

Time From this light curve, we can deduce that... O the star has a high mass exoplanet orbiting it O the star has an exoplanet orbiting it that has an eccentric orbit O the star has an exoplanet orbiting it that has an eccentric orbit O the star has an exoplanet that is not on the same orbital plane as the star L Brightness

Most stars (Main sequence) generate light through the same mechanism. Because of this, there is an empirical relation between their mass, M, and their Luminosity, L. This relation could be written in the form L/Lsun = (M/Msun, This relation is shown in the log-log diagram below. Find the value of a and round it to the nearest integer. 10 104 102 10-2 10-4 0.1 1.0 2.0 0.2 0.5 5.0 10.0 20.0 Mam (solar masses) Luminosty (solar units)