Understanding Our Universe
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9780393614428
Author: PALEN, Stacy, Kay, Laura, Blumenthal, George (george Ray)
Publisher: W.w. Norton & Company,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 5.5, Problem 5.5CYU
To determine
The difference in the terrestrial planets as compared to the giant planets of the solar system.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
According to the chart below, how do the gas giants differ from the terrestrial planets?
THE TERRESTRIAL PLANETS
THE GAS GIANTS
MERCURY
MARS
JUPITER
SATURN
URANUS
NEPTUNE
VENUS
EARTH
ROCK
ROCK
ROCK
ROCK
INNER
CORE
INNER
CORE
CORE
SIren/
Nickel
CORE
Iron/
WATER
WATER
WATER
Nickel
OUTER
CORE
OUTER
CORE
METALLIC
U HYDROGEN
METALLIC
WATER
MANTLE
Reck
HYDROGEN
MANTLE
Rock
MANTLE
Reck
CORE
SIren/
Silicates
Silicates
Silicates
Nickel
HYDROGEN
GAS
HYDROGEN
GAS
HYDROGEN
HYDROGEN
GAS
GAS
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
SURFACE
O The gas giants do not have solid surfaces.
O The gas giants have an iron core.
O The gas giants lack hydrogen gas.
O The gas giants do not contain water.
Which of the following statements is correct?
a. The formation of planets stopped because the solar nebula got cooler
c. The formation of planets stopped because the solar nebula ran out of planetesimals
d. The formation of planets stopped because the solar nebula spinning was slowing down
e. The formation of planets stopped because the young Sun's strong solar wind swept away material not yet accreted onto the planets
The cores of terrestrial planets are mostly metal because:
The entire planets are mostly metal
Metals are denser and so sank to the centres of planets when they were still molten
Metals condensed first in the formation of the Solar System
Radioactivity created metals in the core of planets from the decay of uranium
Chapter 5 Solutions
Understanding Our Universe
Ch. 5.1 - Prob. 5.1CYUCh. 5.2 - Prob. 5.2CYUCh. 5.3 - Prob. 5.3CYUCh. 5.4 - Prob. 5.4CYUCh. 5.5 - Prob. 5.5CYUCh. 5.6 - Prob. 5.6CYUCh. 5 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 4QAP
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 6QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 7QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 8QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 9QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 10QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 11QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 12QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 13QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 14QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 15QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 16QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 17QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 18QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 19QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 20QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 21QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 22QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 23QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 24QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 25QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 27QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 28QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 29QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 30QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 31QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 32QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 34QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 35QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 36QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 37QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 38QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 39QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 40QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 41QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 42QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 43QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 44QAPCh. 5 - Prob. 45QAP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- How do the planets in our solar system, for example Jupiter, affect the orbits of the other planets? How relatively stable are the orbits of the planets in the solar system?arrow_forwardWhich of these views cannot be used when trying to detect exoplanets using the radial velocity method? XYZ all of these can be observed using the radial velocity method none of these can be observed using the radial velocity method? X Y Z all of these can be observed using the radial velocity method none of these can be observed using the radial velocity method Figure X to Earth Figure Y to Earth Figure Z to Earth Which of the systems above could not be detected using the transit method?arrow_forwardThe search for extrasolar planets fall broadly into two categories, what are they? Lensing and transits Astrometry and Doppler shifts Speckle imaging and interferometry Dust emission and radio bursts Direct and indirect detectionarrow_forward
- Planetary migration is a new process that has been added to the nebular theory of solar system formation. What type of planet, that does not exist in our solar system, made this change to the theory necessary? super-Earths Jovian planets beyond the "frost line" mini-Neptunes O hot Jupiters terrestrial planets in the habitable zonearrow_forwardYou're on your way from Earth to Neptune, and you're 50 million kilometers from Earth. Then at the moment you are orbiting the enter of the Earth the center of the Sun the center of Neptunearrow_forwardWe think the terrestrial planets formed around solid “seeds” that later grew over time through the accretion of rocks and metals. a) Suppose the Earth grew to its present size in 1 million years through the accretion of particles averaging 100 grams each. On average, how many particles did the Earth capture per second, given that the mass of the Earth is = 5.972 × 10 ^24 kg ? b) If you stood on Earth during its formation and watched a region covering 100 m^2, how many impacts would you expect to see in one hour. Use the impact rate you calculated in part a. You’ll need the following as well: the radius of the Earth is = 6.371 × 10 ^6 m and the surface area of the Earth is 4??^2Eartharrow_forward
- Nearly all planets that astronomers have found orbiting other stars have been giant planets with masses more like Jupiter than Earth, and with orbits located very close to their parent stars. Does this prove that our Solar System is unique? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardHow did the giant planets grow to be so large?arrow_forwardWhere would you look for some “original” planetesimals left over from the formation of our solar system?arrow_forward
- Which one of the mechanism below can NOT be responsible for providing intrinsic luminosity for planets? Gravitational settling of the hydrogen molecules. Gravitational settling of the helium atoms. Residual heat dating from the formation epoch of the planets. Decay of radio-active isotopes like uranium.arrow_forwardDescribe a way that gravity influenced the formation of the solar system with the planet orbiting the sun.arrow_forwardHow would the solar system be different if the solar nebula had cooled, with a temperature half its actual value? [select all that apply] options: There would be more comets. Life would have been very unlikely to evolve here. There would be no comets. There would be fewer asteroids. There would be more asteroids. Jovian planets would have formed closer to Sun. Terrestrial planets would be largearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStax
An Introduction to Physical SciencePhysicsISBN:9781305079137Author:James Shipman, Jerry D. Wilson, Charles A. Higgins, Omar TorresPublisher:Cengage Learning
Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9781938168284
Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. Wolff
Publisher:OpenStax
An Introduction to Physical Science
Physics
ISBN:9781305079137
Author:James Shipman, Jerry D. Wilson, Charles A. Higgins, Omar Torres
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Kepler's Three Laws Explained; Author: PhysicsHigh;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyR6EO_RMKE;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY