Microeconomics (7th Edition)
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780134737508
Author: R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O'Brien
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.2CTE
To determine
Efficient level of pollution.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Use a graph to illustrate the quantity of pollution that would be emitted (a) after a corrective tax has been imposed and (b) after tradable pollution permits have been imposed. Could these two quantities ever be equivalent?
There are three identical firms in Happy Valley.
Firms
Initial Pollution Level
Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 unit
A
30 units
$20
B
40 units
$30
C
20 units
$10
The government wants to reduce total pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable permits.
Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so? What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation?
How much larger would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?
Economists define the efficient amount of fund pollutants as the amount that minimizes the sum of damage and control costs. Using this definition, they derive two general rules, one of which is that the efficient level of pollution is not generally zero. Briefly explain why this is true.
Chapter 5 Solutions
Microeconomics (7th Edition)
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.10PA
Ch. 5 - Prob. 5.1.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.2.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.13PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.14PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.15PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.3.16PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.4PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.5PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.6PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.7PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.8PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.9PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.10PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.11PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.4.12PACh. 5 - Prob. 5.1CTECh. 5 - Prob. 5.2CTE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- a. If improved technology causes firms' abatement costs to fall, how, if at all, does this affect the amount of pollution that firms will emit when there is a tax? Explain briefly with a diagram.arrow_forwardThere are three industrial firms in Kitona. The Government wants to reduce pollution to 120 units, so it gives each firm 40 tradable pollution permits. Firm Initial Pollution Level Cost reducing pollution by 1 unit A 70 Units $20 B 80 Units $25 C 50 Units $10 Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation?arrow_forwardThere are three industrial firms in Kitona. The Government wants to reduce pollution to 120 units, so it gives each firm 40 tradable pollution permits. Firm Initial Pollution Level Cost reducing pollution by 1 unit A 70 Units $20 B 80 Units $25 C 50 Units $10 Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? How much higher would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?arrow_forward
- Explain why environmental pollution is regarded as a source of market failure. Briefly describe two different policies which a government might implement to reduce pollution.arrow_forwardJohn Cassidy, a writer for the New Yorker magazine, wrote a blog post arguing against New York City’s having installed bike lanes. Cassidy complained that the bike lanes had eliminated traffic lanes on some streets as well as some on-street parking. A writer for the Economist magazine disputed Cassidy’s argument with the following comment: “I hate to belabor the point, but driving, as it turns out, is associated with a number of negative externalities.” What externalities are associated with driving? How do these externalities affect the debate over whether big cities should install more bike lanes? J. Cassidy. Battle of the Bike Lanes. New Yorker, March 8, 2011. The World Is His Parking Spot. Economist, March 9, 2011. Initial Response should be at least 250 words and should include at least one reference in APA format. The Peer Response should be at least 100 words and add value.arrow_forwardChapter 10 The first government employee suggests reducing pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm reduce its pollution by 2 units. Complete the following table with the total cost to each firm of reducing its pollution by 2 units. Firm Total Cost of Eliminating Two Units of Pollution (Dollars) Firm A Firm B Firm C ☐☐ Method 2: Tradable Permits Meanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 1 6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, i 1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on For example, if firm A agrees to sell a permit to firm B at an agreed-upon price, then firm B would end up with three permits and would nee reduce its pollution by only 1 unit…arrow_forward
- Economists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this? A. Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970. B. When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower. C. When levels of pollution are…arrow_forwardThere are three industrial firms in a town Firm Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit A 30 units $20 40 units 20 units B с $30 $10 The government wants to reduce pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable pollution permits. 1. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so. What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? 2. How much higher would the costs of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?arrow_forwardcome up with your own example of positive externality and then another example of negative externality. Briefly explain why they can be considered externalities.arrow_forward
- Chapter 8 in Tietenberg and Lewis looks at climate change, the most important environmental issue of our time. Economists generally agree that putting a price on carbon is the best approach to reducing climate warming carbon emissions. The two main strategies for doing this are carbon taxes and the cap and trade version of emissions trading. Discuss the pros and cons to these two approaches to pricing carbon. Why do economists favor these kinds of market-based strategies to pollution control over “command and control” approaches such technology standards?arrow_forwardBriefly explain what is meant by the term "externality" and how it occurs. What are some ways (name at least 2) in which a negative externality can be corrected?arrow_forwardWhat are the costs of pollution according to the Lancet Commission on pollution and health? Why are those numbers likely to be an underestimate? Explain.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning