Concept explainers
To analyze:
The capability of the response of moths with disrupted tymbal organs to the evasive behaviors of bats. The importance of this parameter for the validity of given experiment.
Given information:
Researchers used tiger moths (Bertholdia trigona) to test whether ultrasonic clicks produced by unique tymbal organs located in the thorax of moths, jam the echolocation to avoid capture by bats. Bats are known to catch these moths by echolocation.
Experiments were conducted on two groups of moths, out of which they punctured the tymbal organs of one group carrying 41 moths that makes moth unable to produce sounds (silenced) that can protect them from capture. The other group (38 moths) were kept normal with intact tymbal organs. They were released into the areas where bats were allowed to feed on them. The following tables show the results of this experiment.
Figure 1(A) depicts the number of attacks on the bars when silenced or clicking moths exhibited a particular evasive behavior. There is clearly no difference between behaviors or between silenced moths and clicking moths. However, in Figure 1(B), the number of captures that were made when silenced or clicking moths exhibited a particular evasive behavior is depicted that shows a huge difference between them.
Figure 1: (A) number of attacks; (B) Number of captures in moths showing evasive behaviors.
Introduction:
Bats capture their prey moths by the mechanism of echolocation. They generate ultrasonic signals that strike on flying moths and echo back to the bat, signaling them to capture their prey. Moths have the ability to sense those ultrasonic signals with the help of tympana and exhibit some behaviors to prevent capture. Capture is prevented by changes in their flight, dives, and production of ultrasonic clicks.
Explanation of Solution
The evolution of certain mechanisms in the moths to prevent capture by prey includes the changes in their flight, dive, or by producing ultrasonic clicks. These ultrasonic clicks have echo jamming mechanisms and are produced by tymbal membranes of moths to protect them from being captured.
The data given in Figure 1(A) shows the number of moths that showed evasive behaviors when attacked. It was observed that both the silenced moths and clicked moths respond to the attack by the bats. The silenced moths do not lose its ability to respond and prevent capture by other mechanisms like changes in flight and diving mechanisms. This shows that silencing affects only the responses that are caused by tymbal membranes and moths respond to the ultrasonic waves of bats by showing evasive behaviors.
This is significant for validity of experiment to effectively test the hypothesis made by the researchers that the clicks served as the echolocation jammers.
Thus, moths in the given experiment with disrupted tymbal organ are capable of responding to the ultrasonic waves of the bats with evasive behavior. This indicates that even in the absence of tymbal organs moths prevent capture by other mechanisms.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 45 Solutions
Life: The Science of Biology
- Newsome, Britten, and Movshon found that the coherence between the dots’ ______ of movement was ______ correlated with the accuracy of the monkey’s performance. a. direction; negatively b. direction; positively c. speed; negatively d. speed; positivelyarrow_forwardApply the subtypes of memory and brain regions involved in each to rodent experiments in learning and memory.arrow_forwardWhich sense do Lemurs rely on that monkeys do not? How many species of lemurs live on Madagascar? How did this happen?arrow_forward
- Suppose that an arthropod such as a locust or crayfish hasabout 105neurons, a fish 108, and a rat 1010. Is the behaviorof the fish 1000 times more complicated than that of thearthropod? Why or why not? What does the difference innumber of neurons suggest about how these different animalsgenerate patterns of behavior?arrow_forwardIn an experiment that tested eye muscle reaction time based on a physical stimulus, 12 subjects were tapped on the shoulder using a mallet connected to the BioPac system. The mallet was used to display an accurate time of impact compared to reaction time. The visual reaction to stimulus had a shorter average reaction time than the visual reaction to light. This occurred in both the dominant and non-dominant eyes. Even though the reaction times were faster on average, the dominant eye was still slower to react. What could explain these results?arrow_forwardWhat is the "coincidence" in the Jeffress neural coincidence model? Two sound sources have the same frequency and amplitude at the same time. Signals arrive at two different neurons at the same time. Signals arrive from the two ears at the same time. Two sound sources are in the same location in the sound environarrow_forward
- Which of the following physiological systems has undergone selection in cockroaches in response to poison traps placed by humans? a. Tactile sensory neurons to sense human movement b. Visual systems to detect bait traps c. Digestion of glucose in the stomach d. Taste and sensory neuronsarrow_forwardWrite a Worm neuronal function assay paragraph about a worm neuronal function and find an experiment that could test why the worm may have this worm neuronal function. Such as a worm spiraling. One robust assay of worm behavior is…. “Finish the sentence” and find an experiment that could determine why the worm behavior is this way.arrow_forwardA single orientation column contains neurons a. with a wide range of orientation preferences. b. with a wide range of taste preferences. c. with no orientation preferences. d. with the same orientation preference.arrow_forward
- Why did Thompson conclude that eyeblink conditioning depends on the lateral interpositus nucleus, instead of the red nucleus?A. Inactivating the red nucleus failed to suppress responses.B. Inactivating the red nucleus suppressed responses, and after the rabbit recovered, it had to learn the same as a rabbit that had never been trained.C. Inactivating the red nucleus suppressed responses to some stimuli but not others.D. Inactivating the red nucleus suppressed responses, but did not prevent learning.arrow_forwardConsider the audibility curves in the graph above. Suppose all animals listed in the graph are present, and a sound with a frequency of 5000 Hz is played. Which of the following statements would be correct? Group of answer choices The brachiosaurus perceived the greatest loudness of the 5,000 Hz sound A sound of 1,000 Hz would need greater amplitude than the 5,000 Hz sound for the great tit to perceive the same loudness A sound of 10,000 Hz would need greater amplitude than the 5,000 Hz sound for the dog to perceive the same loudness A sound of 9,000 Hz would be perceived as louder for the human than the dog.arrow_forwardLog observations on the feeding behavior of the cockroach in Ta ble 1. Note of the sensory input &motor output corresponding with the behavior of feeding. Sensory input is anything perceived by the senses; the stimuli perceived by the organism like olfactory, visual, mechanoreception, gustatory, & hearing. Motor output results after the nervous system integrates & processes the sensory input. It synthesizes sensory input to compute an appropriate motor response like leg extension etc.arrow_forward
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage Learning