Microeconomics
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259915727
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 14, Problem 7RQ
To determine
Evaluate the statement whether it is true or false.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
4. The following payoff matrix shows the profit payoff to firms A and B from combinations of
price strategies HI and LO.
A
НІ
LOW
B
HI
(6, 6)
(16, -5)
LOW
(-7, 15)
(0, 0)
(a) In a one period game, what strategy would each firm follow, and why? Determine the
equilibrium on the one-period game.
(b) Now assume the game is infinite in length. Firm B goes HI in period 1 and continues
with HI so long as A does as well. Firm A is deciding between HI and LO. Determine
the
range of discount rates for which HI is the better choice for Firm A.
2. Consider the following game. Assume that this game is played simultaneously and without collusion. The two companies are choosing between two strategies: go international or stay national. The outcomes of each strategy for each company are given the following payoff matrix:
a) Find Nash equilibrium in this game. Interpret the equilibrium you found.
b) What is the Chipco's dominant strategy, if it has one? How shall Chipco's payoffs change for it to not have a dominant strategy anymore?
Suppose O2 and Vodafone are the only two telecommunicationscompanies in UK. Both companies are considering whether ornot to stop offering unlimited data plans. Each company has twostrategies: stop or don’t stop. The first entry in the brackets is the payoffsof O2 and the second entry is the payoffs of Vodafone, both in $million.What will be the dominant strategies of O2 and Vodafone and what willbe the Nash equilibrium? Explain your answers.
Chapter 14 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 14.2 - Prob. 1QQCh. 14.2 - The D2e segment of the demand curve D2eD1 in graph...Ch. 14.2 - Prob. 3QQCh. 14.2 - Prob. 4QQCh. 14 - Prob. 1DQCh. 14 - Prob. 2DQCh. 14 - Prob. 3DQCh. 14 - Prob. 4DQCh. 14 - Prob. 5DQCh. 14 - Prob. 6DQ
Ch. 14 - Prob. 7DQCh. 14 - Prob. 8DQCh. 14 - Prob. 9DQCh. 14 - Prob. 10DQCh. 14 - Prob. 11DQCh. 14 - Prob. 12DQCh. 14 - Prob. 13DQCh. 14 - Prob. 14DQCh. 14 - Prob. 1RQCh. 14 - Prob. 2RQCh. 14 - Prob. 3RQCh. 14 - Prob. 4RQCh. 14 - Prob. 5RQCh. 14 - Prob. 6RQCh. 14 - Prob. 7RQCh. 14 - Prob. 8RQCh. 14 - Prob. 9RQCh. 14 - Prob. 10RQCh. 14 - Prob. 1PCh. 14 - Prob. 2PCh. 14 - Prob. 3P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Wal-Mart's dominant strategy is to pick a price of $. Target Price = $30 Price = $17 %3D What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? $6,000 $1,500 O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Target to choose a price of $17 and Wal-Mart to choose a price of $30. Price = $30 $6,000 $11,000 O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Target and Wal-Mart to both choose a price of $30. Wal - Mart C. The Nash equilibrium is for Target to choose a price of $30 and Wal-Mart to choose a price of $17. $11,000 $4,500 Price = $17 %3D $1,500 $4,500 O D. The Nash equilibrium is for Target and Wal-Mart to both choose a price of $17. South OE. O E. A Nash equilibrium does not exist for this game.arrow_forwardConsider the Cournot duopoly model. Suppose the inverse demand is given by P(Q) = 200 - Q where Q = q1 + q2, and production has no costs. %3! What are the payoffs for each firm? O 200 – q1 and 200 - q2 O (200 – q1 - q2)qı - 91 and (200- q1-92)92- 92 200 – q1 – q2 and 200 – q1 - 92 O (200 – q1 - q2)q1 and (200 - q1- 92)q2 O (200 – q1)qı and (200- q2)q2arrow_forwardQ3. Explain the concept of mixed strategy and how to calculate the value of game. Also provide a suitable example for mixed strategy. Determine which of the following two-person zero-sum games are strictly determinable and fair. Give the optimum strategies for each player in the case of it being strictly determinable. I. I. a- Player A Player B B1 B2 B3 A1 8 4 A2 5 -1 b. I II II IV V I 4 -2 -2 3 1 A II 1 -1 III -6 -5 -2 -4 4 IV 3 1 -8arrow_forward
- Suppose that there are two firms producing a homogenous product and competing in Cournot fashion and let the market demand be given by Q = 240- Assume for simplicity that each firm operates with zero total cost. Find each firm's Cournot Nash equilibrium profit for each firm. $21600 O $19200 O $18000 O $16000arrow_forwardEconomics How would the Coumot equilibrium change in the airine example if American's marginal cost were $100 and United's were $2007 The demand the duopoly quantity-setting firms face is Q- 339 -p with an inverse demand function of p- 339-19A1qu- where qa is the quantity produced by American and qu is the quantity produced by United. The Cournot-Nash equilibrium occurs where qa equals and qu equals (enter numeric responses using integers)arrow_forwardTeam 2 plays A Team 2 plays B Team 1 plays A 0, 24 10, 10 Team 1 plays B 4, 4 24, 0 Consider the infinitely repeated version of the game above. Which of the following is the smallest discount factor such that the grim trigger strategy under which team 1 plays A and team 2 plays B until a team deviates, after which team 1 plays B forever and team 2 plays A forever is a Nash Equilibrium? O 1/2 O3/4 O 1/100arrow_forward
- One key difference between an oligopoly market and a competitive market is that oligopolistic firms O are price takers while competitive firms are not. sell their product at a price equal to marginal cost while competitive firms do not. O can affect the profit of other firms in the market by the choices they make while firms in competitive markets do not affect each other by the choices they make. O sell completely unrelated products while competitive firms do notarrow_forwardGame theory TITAN is the dominant steel producer in the US, but its global competitor GIANTS has gained some sizeable market share in the US recently by expanding into US via acquisitions. TITAN currently has a 40,000-ton capacity plant and GIANTS has two plants - a 16,000-ton plant and a 4,000-ton plant. Suppose these are the only two producers of steel in the US. The current market price is $5M per 1000 tons, and variable costs are $2M per 1000 tons. Assume fixed costs are negligible relative to variable costs, and the quality of steel produced across plants is identical. At current market price there is significant overcapacity, so each firm only produces 50% of its total capacity, i.e. the production level for TITAN is 20,000 tons and that for GIANTS is 10,000 tons respectively. Marketing research had indicated that lowering the price to $4M per 1000 tons while the other firm maintained its price at $5M would shift half of the other firm’s demand to the firm with the lower price.…arrow_forwardWhat is the distinguishing characteristics of oligopoly in relation to the other forms of the other market organizations? What is its significance? In which sector of the Zambian economy is oligopoly most relevant? An oligopolistic firm from the telecommunication industry in Zambia follows demand-and-cost situation in 2009.Price in ZWK Quantity Total cost20 7 3619 8 4518 9 5417 10 6316 11 7215 12 81i. How much output should the oligopolistic produce? What price should it charge and what is the maximum profit can this firm earns?arrow_forward
- 11 21. Imagine an N firm oligopoly for "nominally differentiated" goods. That is, each of the N firms produces a product that "looks" different from the products of its competitors, but that "really" isn't any different. However, each firm is able to fool some of the buying public. Specifically, each of the N firms (which are identical and have zero marginal cost of production) has a captive market -consumers who will buy only from that firm. The demand generated by each of these captive markets is given by the demand function Pn A- Xn , where Xn is the amount supplied to this captive market and Pn is the price of the production of firm n. There is also a group of intelligent consumers who realize that the products are really undifferentiated. These…arrow_forward3. Consider a model of Cournot duopoly. Two firms produce an identical product. The inverse demand function for the product is given by p = 60-y, where y = y₁ + y2 is the sum of the quantity produced by the two firms. Production costs are zero for both firms. a) Find the quantity produced by each firm in the Nash equilibrium of this game. Find the price of the product and the profit of each firm. b) Now say that marketing guru Jim has a proposal for firm 1. He would be able to convince people that the two firms' products were in fact slightly different from each other, so that the amount produced by each firm would not impact the price of the other's product as much as it did before. The inverse demand function for each product would become P₁ = 60-9₁-92 and p2 = 60 - 92 - -9₁. What is the most that firm 1 would be willing to pay Jim to do this? Show your work and explain in a few sentences what you did to find your answer.arrow_forward5. The following represents the payoffs in a one period game in prices HI and LO. A HI LOW B HI (100, 100) (200,0) LOW (0, 200) (50, 50) (a) If A and B were playing this game only once, what strategy should A choose, and why? (b) A and B are playing the same game an infinite number of times and each has a discount rate of 50% (.50). Firm B adopts a trigger strategy and selects HI in the first round. What would be A's present value of profits from cooperation (HI)? What would be its present value from cheating (LO)? Would A choose to cooperate or cheat?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning