EconomicsHow would the Coumot equilibrium change in the airine example if American's marginal cost were $100 and United's were $2007The demand the duopoly quantity-setting firms face isQ- 339 -pwith an inverse demand function ofp- 339-19A1qu-where qa is the quantity produced by American and qu is the quantity produced by United.The Cournot-Nash equilibrium occurs where qa equalsand qu equals (enter numeric responses using integers)

Given: American's marginal cost is = $100 United's marginal cost is = $200 The demand for a firm is:…

How would the Coumot equilibrium change in the airline example if American's marginal cost were $100 and United's were $2007 The demand the duopoly quantity-setting firms face is Q-339-p with an inverse demand function of p330 - 19A- 19U- where ga is the quantity produced by American and qu is the quantity produced by United. The Cournot-Nash equilibrium occurs where qa equalsand qu equals (enter numeric responses using integers)

How would the Coumot equilibrium change in the airline example if American's marginal cost were $100 and United's were $2007 The demand the duopoly quantity-setting firms face is Q-339-p with an inverse demand function of p330 - 19A- 19U- where ga is the quantity produced by American and qu is the quantity produced by United. The Cournot-Nash equilibrium occurs where qa equalsand qu equals (enter numeric responses using integers)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

QUESTION 14 Note: No referencing is required for short answer questions. The following market is a duopoly populated only by the companies Alphe and Beta. The pay-off matric immediately below shows the combinations of pricing strategies available Assuming Beta has a first mover advantage in a one-shot game, what is lieky to be the Nash equilibrium? Explain your answer Alpha High price Low price High price 250, 200 Beta 200, 100 Low price 50, 150 100, 250 The numbers represent millions of c in profe (The r
The firms in a duopoly produce differentiated products. The inverse demand for Firm 1 is The inverse demand for Firm 2 is P₂=70-02-0.501- Each firm has a marginal cost of m=$1 per unit. Solve for the Nash-Coumot equilibrium quantities. The Cournot equilibrium quantities are and P₁-52-91-0.592 (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) 4₁ = units 92 units. possibi
Assume that Acme and Gamma are the two main rivals in the market for hair dryers. Each firm is considering prices of $50 or $60, with the following possible profit outcomes: Gamma Price = 50 Price = 60 Price = 50 40, 45 45, 42 Acme Price = 60 24, 55 30, 48 A) Assume the firms choose prices simultaneously. Does the game have a solution? Explain. B) Is the solution you have identified a Nash Equilibrium? Explain why or why not.
The demand the duopoly firms face is p = 100 – 2Q where Q = q1 + q2. Each firm has the following cost function: c(qi) = 40 + qi2/2, i = 1, 2. Using calculus, determine the Stackelberg equilibrium. determine the Cournot equilibrium. plz answer correct calculation asap plz Dont answer by pen pepar plz
2 firms are engaged in Cournot competition; firm A faces the cost curveCA(yA)=40yAand firm Bfaces the cost curveCB(yB)=40yB. The inverse market demand curve isP(y)=100y, whereyrepresents market level of output. a)Define the Cournot game. b)In 1 or 2 sentences explain why a firm has no incentive to deviate from the Cournot Nash equilibrium(holding their opponent’s strategy constant). c)Find the Cournot Nash Equilibrium. d)Now suppose instead of playing their strategies at the same time, firm A moves first and then firm B moves second(sequentialgame).Does firm A earn higher profits in this game or the game in part c)?
Consider the graph below. Suppose qMC = 400, pMC = $10, and ATC = $12 at 400 units. Is the profit-maximizing firm in monopolistic competition making a profit or loss, and by how much? Price ATC MR = MC $800 profit 9мс MR Firm MC ATC Firm Demand = AR Quantity Output
Imagine that firm X chooses their quantity first, then firm Y observes the quantity of firm X and chooses their own quantity. What is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium? Is there a first or second-mover advantage here? You don't need to draw the whole game tree but you should give some kind of explanation for how you came to this equilibrium. (You may assume that firm X can only choose quantities that are multiples of 200. This prevents you from having to deal with prices that are not on the schedule and makes firm Y's strategy easier to write. )
. OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, was founded in 1969. Their original objective was to form a cartel to increase the price that they receive for their oil exports. Create a prisoner’s dilemma type game for two large members of OPEC (e.g. Saudi Arabia and Indonesia). Create numbers, where payoffs are total annual oil export revenues for each of these two countries. Verbally explain how you got your numbers. Find the Nash equilibrium. Based on this model, what strategy is in the oil exporters’ best interest (Nash or otherwise)? How do they make it happen? Create another prisoner’s dilemmamodel for all of OPEC on one side, and all non OPEC oil exporting nations on the other side. Create numbers, where payoffs are total annual oil export revenues for each of the two sides. Verbally explain how you created your numbers. Also create your numbers applying the fact that OPEC’s total production capacity is greater than total non OPEC exports…
Suppose that identical duopoly firms have constant marginal costs of $20 per unit. Firm 1 faces a 110-2p1 + P2, where q1 is Firm 1's output, p1 is Firm 1's price, and p2 is Firm 2's price. Similarly, the demand Firm 2 faces is 92 110-2p2 + p1. What is Firm 1's profit demand function of 9₁ under the Nash-Bertrand equilibrium, assuming no fixed costs? = =
Suppose that identical duopoly firms have constant marginal costs of $0 per unit. Firm 1 faces ademand function of q1 = 100 – 2p1 + p2, where q1 is Firm 1’s output, p1 is Firm 1’s price, and p2 isFirm 2’s price. Similarly, the demand Firm 2 faces is q2 = 100 – 2p2 + p1. Please solve for theBertrand equilibrium.
Determine the equilibrium output, price and profit for each firm assuming the twofirms move simultaneously
Boulder has several ski and snowboard retailers that sell similar brands. Prices across these retails are relatively stable during preseason (ski/snowboard season) and midseason, but become volatile postseason. For the past few years, when one retailer slashed prices (especially postseason), other retailers followed suit. All retailers behave as oligopolists. Suppose that retailer A faces an inverse demand of p = 1,500 – 1.5Q, when the other retailers match retailer A’s price changes, and p=1200 – 0.7Q, when the other retailers don't match retailer A’s price changes. Suppose also that retailer A's cost function is C(Q) = 20,000 + 10Q + 0.8Q2. Question: Under these conditions, what is the most profit retailer A can make?