The marginal benefit of reducing pollution and the marginal cost of reducing pollution are given by the following equations: MB = -2U2+ 18, and MC = 2U² + 2, where U is the number of units of pollution abatement. What is the optimal number of units of pollution abatement? O A) o B) 1 C) 2

Suppose we are interested in reducing the carbon footprint associated with heating/cooling buildings oncampus. The functions below describe marginal costs ofCO2abatement (expressed as a function of pollution)for two buildings on the Hendrix College campus. These are hypothetical but are influenced by buildingcharacteristics like age, size, and types of usage. (This information is used for questions 1-4) MCMills = 100−10xM MCSLTC = 75−2.5xS 1. If the College pursued its abatement target by directing each building manager to cut emissions in halffor their respective building, what is the total cost of abatement? 2. If the abatement were pursued with an on-campus carbon tax of$30, would there be the same level ofabatement? Show your work and/or explain. 3. If the goal of the college is to meet the abatement target from question 1, what is the appropriate taxrate? 4. If the appropriate tax rate is used (answer from Q3), how much money can be saved compared to thecommand & control…

Give only typing answer with explanation and conclusion Suppose there are two industries with MAC functions as follows: MACA = 240-3EA and MACB=160-2EB And suppose the local government wished to reduce the total industry emissions by 50% (from the uncontrolled level) by implementing a uniform standard. How much emission would be reduced and what would be the total abatement costs for each industry under this uniform standard?

The Filthy Chemical Company dumps 100 tons of pollutants every year in the Pristine Lake. The Trout Fishing Co., the only other user of the lake,estimates that if Q tons of pollution were cleaned up every year its profits would rise according to the relation Filthy estimates it can clean the pollutants at constant average costs of $2 per ton. (a) In the interest of efficiency, how much pollution should be cleaned up every year? (b) Suppose Filthy bought Trout. How much would it clean up? What if Trout bought Filthy?

No written by hand solution

Use the model of environmental pollution to model the following changes in a polluting industry to: i) the socially optimal level of pollution; ii) the total abatement costs; and ii) the total damage costs (а) A new technology is invented that allows firms to reducе pollution associated with each level of production output. (b) The government announces a new commitnment to more strictly enforce current environmental regulations. (c) A new study finds the pollutant in question to be more carcinogenic than originally thought.

None

5

Consider two sources of a non-uniformly mixed pollutant: one source with a high and the other one with low transfer coefficient. Which statement(s) is/are true? Mark all that applies. Group of answer choices For the source with the higher transfer coefficient. a higher ambient charge per unit of emissions is justified. For the source with the lower transfer coefficient a higher ambient charge per unit of emissions is justified. For the source with the higher emissions level a higher ambient charge per unit of emissions is justified. The source with the higher transfer coefficient is required to purchase more ambient allowance when it emits a unit of emission. The source with the lower transfer coefficient is required to purchase more ambient allowance when it emits a unit of emission. The source with the higher emission level is required to purchase more ambient allowance when it emits a unit of emission than the source with the lower overall emissions level

Im confused on this question.