ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Expert Solution
arrow_forward
Step 1
Socially optimum output is the optimal distribution of resources in society, taking into account all external costs and benefits as well as internal costs and benefits
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- A city of Hayward has a water reservoir that agricultural user (A) and recreational user (B) have access rights to. Both users A and B want to consume water from the reservoir. The total supply of water there is limited to 18 due to a dry weather this year. User A has inverse demand function: P = 30-Q. User A has marginal cost of pumping water from the reservoir: MC=2. For user B, her inverse demand function is P =20-Q. User B has marginal cost of pumping water (so that she can grow fish in her water garden): MC=2. Efficient allocations are QA- and user B's net benefit is and QB= When the water allocation is efficient, user A's net benefit is Thus, economic surplus isarrow_forwardSuppose MAC functions for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, are MAC₁= 60-2E₁and MAC₂-48-3E2 respectively. (i) Suggest the (socially) cost-effective way to set emission standards for the two firms to reduce their combined level of emissions to 20 units. [Note that we want only 20 units of emissions from the two firms at the end.] (ii) What is the sum of the abatement costs (or total social compliance costs) when emissions are reduced from the two firms to 20 units in the socially cost-effective manner by using emission standards. [This is related to part (i).] (iii) What emission tax rate applied simulataneously to the two firms reduces the combined level of emissions to 20 units from the two firms just as the cost-effective way to set standards? [This question needs to answered based on your answer(s) to part (ii).]arrow_forwardLet me know if you are able to answer these as the next partarrow_forward
- True or false (A). A profit‐maximizing monopolist will produce output where marginal cost is equal to price (B). Suppose we know that a monopolist is maximizing profits. The monopolist has maximized the difference between marginal revenue and marginal cost. (C) In perfect competition, MUX = PX is the condition that ensures that firms produce the right things.arrow_forwardSuppose the demand for standard sized bottled water in the US is Qd=120-30.5P where Qd is monthly quantity demanded in millions and P is the price per bottle in dollars and cents. If the marginal private cost (MPC) of producing the bottled water is one dollar, calculate the market equilibrium quantity. Explain what a constant marginal cost implies. Does that mean the total opportunity cost of producing bottled water is unrelated to how many are produced? Let’s assume that the marginal private benefit (MPB) of bottled water equals the marginal social benefit (MSB). Explain what that means. At the equilibrium calculated in part A, what do you know about buyers’ willingness to pay in each transaction?arrow_forwardExton and Shill are 2 firms that can control emissions at the following marginal costs: MC1 = 400q1, MC2 = 200q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions reduced by Exton and Shill, respectively. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 25 units of emissions. Estimate the cost-effective allocation of emissions control needed if a total reduction of 30 units of emissions is necessary.arrow_forward
- There are three demanders of a public good. Their demands are given by: P = 60 – Q P2 = 100 – Q P3 = 140 – Q Suppose the marginal cost of providing the public good is $180. What is the economically efficient level of production for the good? Of the three consumers, who would be willing to pay for this public good? Show this on a graph. (а) (b) Suppose the marginal cost of providing the public good is $60. What is the economically efficient level of production for the good? Of the three consumers, who would be willing to pay for this public good? Show this on a graph. Suppose the marginal cost of providing the public good is $350. What is the economically efficient level of production for the good? Of the three consumers, who would be willing to pay for this public good? Show this on a graph. (c) Suppose the free-rider problem leads to this public good not being provided. Suppose the marginal cost is $180. What is the size of the DWL due to this failure.arrow_forwardThe marginal benefit of reducing pollution and the marginal cost of reducing pollution are given by the following equations: MB = -2U2 + 18, and MC = 2U2 + 2, where U is the number of units of pollution abatement. What is the optimal number of units of pollution abatement? A) o B) 1 C) 2 D) 3 E) 4arrow_forwardExton and Shill are 2 firms that can control emissions at the following marginal costs: MC1 = 400q1, MC2 = 200q2, where q1 and q2 are the amount of emissions reduced by Exton and Shill, respectively. Assume that with no control at all, each firm would be emitting 25 units of emissions. Estimate the cost-effective allocation of emissions control needed if a total reduction of 30 units of emissions is necessary.arrow_forward
- (A) Suppose that the two firms merge. Write down the profit function of the merged firm. Calculate the profit maximizing level of output, the amount of pollution for the merged firm, and its profit. Is the merger Pareto improvement? Why or why not? (B) Suppose that the merger is forbidden by the government. Instead, now the fishery has the property right to water. In other words, anybody who wants to pollute the water needs to buy a pollution right from the fishery. Let the price of the pollution right be Px. Write down the steel mill’s new profit function and the fishery’s new profit function. (C) Calculate the profit maximizing level of output for each firm, the amount of pollution, and the price of pollution right. please, please answer the three questions together..arrow_forwardThe travel time (t) on the segment of a highway connecting city A with city Bhas been observed to follow the equation below, as a function of traffic flow(v): t = 15 + 0.02v, where t and v are measured in minutes and vehicles perhour, respectively. The demand function for travel connecting the two cities isv = 3500 – 120t.a) Determine the equilibrium time and traffic flow.b) If the length of the highway segment is 30 kilometres, what is the averagespeed of vehicles traversing this segment at equilibrium conditions?arrow_forwardConsider an industry with two firms that emit a uniformly mixed air pollutant (e.g., carbon dioxide). The marginal abatement cost functions for Firm 1 and Firm 2 are: MAC1 = 100 - e1 MAC2 = 100 - 4e2 Aggregate emissions for the industry are denoted as E = e1 + e2. 1. In an unregulated environment how many units of emissions does each firm emit? Firm 1’s unregulated level of emissions ____________ Firm 2’s unregulated level of emissions ____________ Total unregulated level of emissions ______________ Suppose a regulator has a goal of reducing the total level of emissions from the amount from the amount you answered in [1] to 25 units. The regulator would like to achieve the goal of 25 units of total emissions in a cost-effective way. To do so it issues 25 permits, 10 are given to Firm 1 and 15 are given to Firm 2. A firm can only emit a unit of pollution if they have a permit for that unit, otherwise they must abate. After the permits are allocated,…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education