Concept explainers
Variable and absorption costing, actual costing. The Iron City Company started business on January 1, 2017. Iron City manufactures a specialty honey beer, which it sells directly to state-owned distributors in Pennsylvania. Honey beer is produced and sold in six-packs, and in 2017, Iron City produced more six-packs than it was able to sell. In addition to variable and fixed manufacturing
Iron City’s CFO is convinced that the firm should use an actual costing system but is debating whether to follow variable or absorption costing. The controller notes that Iron City’s operating income for the year would be $438,000 under variable costing and $461,000 under absorption costing. Moreover the ending finished-goods inventory would be valued at $7.15 under variable costing and $8.30 under absorption costing.
Iron City incurs no variable nonmanufacturing expenses.
- 1. What is Iron City’s total contribution margin for 2017?
- 2. Iron City incurs fixed
manufacturing costs in addition to its fixed marketing and administrative costs. How much did Iron City incur in fixed manufacturing costs in 2017? - 3. How many six-packs did Iron City produce in 2017?
- 4. How much in variable manufacturing overhead did Iron City incur in 2017?
- 5. For 2017, how much in total manufacturing overhead is expensed under variable costing, either through cost of goods sold or as a period expense?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 9 Solutions
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
- The Iron City Company started business on January 1, 2017. Iron City manufactures a specialty honey beer, which it sells directly to state-owned distributors in Pennsylvania. Honey beer is produced and sold in six-packs, and in 2017, Iron City produced more six-packs than it was able to sell. In addition to variable and fixed manufacturing overhead, Iron City incurred direct materials costs of $880,000, direct manufacturing labor costs of $400,000, and fixed marketing and administrative costs of $295,000. For the year, Iron City sold a total of 180,000 six-packs for a sales revenue of $2,250,000. Iron City’s CFO is convinced that the firm should use an actual costing system but is debating whether to follow variable or absorption costing. The controller notes that Iron City’s operating income for the year would be $438,000 under variable costing and $461,000 under absorption costing. Moreover, the ending f inished-goods inventory would be valued at $7.15 under variable costing and…arrow_forwardPlant-wide, department, and ABC indirect cost rates. Roadster Company (RC) designs and produces automotive parts. In 2017, actual variable manufacturing overhead is $280,000. RC’s simple costing system allocates variable manufacturing overhead to its three customers based on machine-hours and prices its contracts based on full costs. One of its customershas regularly complained of being charged noncompetitive prices, so RC’s controller Matthew Draper realizes that it is time to examine the consumption of overhead resources more closely. He knows that there are three main departments that consume overhead resources: design, production, and engineering. Interviews with the department personnel and examination of time records yield the following detailed information:arrow_forwardParts World (PW) designs and produces automotive parts. In 2017, actual manufacturing overhead is $316,000. PW's simple costing system allocates manufacturing overhead to its three customers based on machine-hours and prices its contracts based on full costs. One of its customers has regularly complained of being charged noncompetitive prices, so PW's controller Duncan Johnson realizes that it is time to examine the consumption of overhead resources more closely. He knows that there are three main departments that consume overhead resources: design, production, and engineering. Interviews with the department personnel and examination of time records yield the following detailed information: (Click the icon to view the information.) Read the requirements. Requirement 1. Compute the manufacturing overhead allocated to each customer in 2017 using the simple costing system that uses machine-hours as the allocation base. Determine the formula needed to calculate overhead using the simple…arrow_forward
- The Iron City Company started business on January 1, 2017. Iron City manufactures a specialty honey beer, which it sells directly to state-owned distributors in Pennsylvania. Honey beer is produced and sold in six-packs, and in 2017, Iron City produced more six-packs than it was able to sell. In addition to variable and fixed manufacturing overhead, Iron City incurred direct materials costs of $880,000, direct manufacturing labor costs of $400,000, and fixed marketing and administrative costs of $295,000. For the year, Iron City sold a total of 180,000 six-packs for a sales revenue of $2,250,000. Iron City’s CFO is convinced that the firm should use an actual costing system but is debating whether to follow variable or absorption costing. The controller notes that Iron City’s operating income for the year would be $438,000 under variable costing and $461,000 under absorption costing. Moreover, the ending f inished-goods inventory would be valued at $7.15 under variable costing and…arrow_forward2) Minnesota Office Products (MOP) produces three different paper products at its Vaasa lumber plant: Supreme, Deluxe, and Regular. Each product has its own dedicated production line at the plant. It currently uses the following three-part classification for its manufacturing costs: direct materials, direct manufacturing labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. Total manufacturing overhead costs of the plant in July 2011 are $150 million ($15 million of which are fixed). This total amount is allocated to each product line on the basis of the direct manufacturing labor costs of each line. Summary data (in millions) for July 2011 are as follows: Supreme Deluxe Regular Direct material costs $ 89 $ 57 $ 60 Direct manufacturing labor costs $ 16 $ 26 $ 8 Manufacturing overhead costs $ 48 $ 78 $ 24 Units produced 125 150 140 a. Compute the manufacturing cost per unit for each product produced in July 2011. b. Suppose that in August 2011, production was 150 million units of Supreme, 190…arrow_forwardMinnesota Office Products (MOP) produces three different paper products at its Vaasa lumber plant: Supreme, Deluxe, and Regular. Each product has its own dedicated production line at the plant. It currently uses the following three-part classification for its manufacturing costs: direct materials, direct manufacturing labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. Total manufacturing overhead costs of the plant in July 2017 are $150 million ($15 million of which are fixed). This total amount is allocated to each product line on the basis of the direct manufacturing labor costs of each line. Summary data (in millions) for July 2017 are as follows: Supreme 89 16 48 125 Answer: Deluxe 57 26 78 150 Regular 60 8 24 140 Total 206 50 150 415 Direct material costs Direct manufacturing labor costs Manufacturing overhead costs Units produced What are the total variable manufacturing costs of the Deluxe paper product?arrow_forward
- Minnesota Office Products (MOP) produces three different paper products at its Vaasa lumber plant: Supreme, Deluxe, and Regular. Each product has its own dedicated production line at the plant. It currently uses the following three-part classification for its manufacturing costs: direct materials, direct manufacturing labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. Total manufacturing overhead costs of the plant in July 2017 are $150 million ($15 million of which are fixed). This total amount is allocated to each product line on the basis of the direct manufacturing labor costs of each line. Summary data (in millions) for July 2017 are as follows: Supreme 89 16 48 125 Answer: Deluxe 57 26 78 150 Regular 60 8 24 140 Direct material costs Direct manufacturing labor costs Manufacturing overhead costs Units produced What are the total manufacturing costs of the Regular paper product? Total 206 50 150 415arrow_forwardMinnesota Office Products (MOP) produces three different paper products at its Vaasa lumber plant: Supreme, Deluxe, and Regular. Each product has its own dedicated production line at the plant. It currently uses the following three-part classification for its manufacturing costs: direct materials, direct manufacturing labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. Total manufacturing overhead costs of the plant in July 2017 are $150 million ($15 million of which are fixed). This total amount is allocated to each product line on the basis of the direct manufacturing labor costs of each line. Summary data (in millions) for July 2017 are as follows: Direct material costs Direct manufacturing labor costs Manufacturing overhead costs Units produced Supreme 89 16 48 125 Answer: Deluxe 57 26 78 150 Regular 60 8 24 140 What is the manufacturing cost per unit of the Supreme paper product? Total 206 50 150 415arrow_forwardAutomotive Products (AP) designs and produces automotive parts. In 2017, actual manufacturing overhead is $317,250. AP's simple costing system allocates manufacturing overhead to its three customers based on machine-hours and prices its contracts based on full costs. One of its customers has regularly complained of being charged noncompetitive prices, so AP's controller DrewBailey realizes that it is time to examine the consumption of overhead resources more closely. He knows that there are three main departments that consume overhead resources: design, production, and engineering. Interviews with the department personnel and examination of time records yield the following detailed information: Read the requirements2. Requirement 1. Compute the manufacturing overhead allocated to each customer in 2017 using the simple costing system that uses machine-hours as the allocation base. Determine the formula needed to calculate overhead using the simple costing method and…arrow_forward
- Sardi Incorporated is considering whether to continue to make a component or to buy it from an outside supplier. The company uses 12,600 of the components each year. The unit product cost of the component according to the company's cost accounting system is given as follows: Direct materials $ 8.40 Direct labor 5.40 Variable manufacturing overhead 1.20 Fixed manufacturing overhead 3.20 Unit product cost $ 18.20 Assume that direct labor is a variable cost. Of the fixed manufacturing overhead, 35% is avoidable if the component were bought from the outside supplier. In addition, making the component uses 1 minutes on the machine that is the company's current constraint. If the component were bought, time would be freed up for use on another product that requires 2 minutes on this machine and that has a contribution margin of $4.80 per unit. When deciding whether to make or buy the component, what cost of making the component should be compared to the price of buying the…arrow_forwardDunn, Inc., is a privately held furniture manufacturer. For August 2018, Dunn had the following standards for one of its products, a wicker chair: Standards per Chair Direct materials 2 square yards of input at $5 per square yard Direct manufacturing labor 0.5 hour of input at $10 per hour The following data were compiled regarding actual performance: actual output units (chairs) produced, 2,000; square yards of input purchased and used, 3,700; price per square yard, $5.10; direct manufacturing labor costs, $8,820; actual hours of input, 900; labor price per hour, $9.80. REQUIREMENTS: 1. Show computations of price and efficiency…arrow_forwardInnovating Motors Company makes electric cars and has two products, the iHybrid and the iBrilliant. To produce the iHybrid, Innovating Motors employed assets of $10,500,000 at the beginning of 2017 and $14,450,000 of assets at the end of 2017. Other costs to manufacture the iHybrid include the following:Direct materials $5,000 per unitSetup $1,500 per setup-hour Production $ 415 per machine-hourGeneral administration and selling costs for iHybrid total $7,820,000 in 2017. During the year, Innovating Motors produced 11,000 iHybrid cars using 6,000 setup-hours and 139,000 machine-hours. It sold these cars for $12,000 each.Required:i. Assuming that Innovating Motors defines investment as average assets during the period,what is the return on investment for the iHybrid division? ii. Calculate the residual income for iHybrid if Innovating Motors has a required rate of return of 16% on investments. iii. Based on its values and strategic thrusts, Innovating Motors is committed to sustainable…arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education