Whether person V can argue that, the country U was negligent per se by its worker’s defilement of the statute.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 9Q

Summary Introduction

To discuss: Whether person V can argue that, the country U was negligent per se by its worker’s defilement of the statute.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Negligence CaseWest v. East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co.In Knox County Tennessee, a convenience store clerk refused to sell Brian Taver beer because he wasalready intoxicated. However, the clerk eventually activated the gas pump and, with the assistance of twoadditional store employees, who helped Taver operate the pump, Taver was able to purchase a small amount ofgas.Taver then drove off, going the wrong way on the highway and without his headlights on. Shortlyafterward, he crashed into an oncoming car, injuring Gary West and Michelle Richardson.West suffered several fractures of his legs, a head injury, and a broken elbow. West works in theconstruction industry. West, who has basic health insurance provided by his employer, was left with over$200,000 in personal debt as a consequence of the accident. Richardson suffered a severe closed-head injury.Richardson is an administrative assistant for the state of Tennessee. Her employer provided betterhealth insurance coverage, so she did not…

In a legal brief on negligence the following statement was made: "Where negligence can be established, it is no defense that the negligent action was in full compliance with all government regulations and permit conditions." Explain why this defense may not be valid.

Under what circumstances should a principal (employer) be responsible for the torts committed by an agent (employee)? If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what circumstances should the agent be held personally liable? Provide an example to illustrate your opinion. What ethical considerations underlie the doctrine of respondeat superior?