Person W’s dog was bitten a two year old child DA . The child faced lot of injuries facial cuts, muscle in his eye, terrifying over his forehead etc. Therefore, his father person D filed a complaint against person W demanding that as proprietor person W is answerable for his dog actions. Person W had not received any complaints earlier about the dog. The dog was not ever nibbled anybody and not violent. To discuss: Whether person W is liable.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 17CP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person W’s dog was bitten a two year old child DA . The child faced lot of injuries facial cuts, muscle in his eye, terrifying over his forehead etc. Therefore, his father person D filed a complaint against person W demanding that as proprietor person W is answerable for his dog actions. Person W had not received any complaints earlier about the dog. The dog was not ever nibbled anybody and not violent.

To discuss: Whether person W is liable.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The Brineys (defendants) owned a large farm on which was located an abandoned farmhouse. For a ten-year period the house had been the subject of several trespassings and housebreakings. In an attempt to stop the intrusions, Briney boarded up the windows and doors and posted “no trespassing” signs. After one break-in, however, Briney set a spring gun in a bedroom. It was placed over the bedroom window so that the gun could not be seen from outside, and no warning of its presence was posted. The gun was set to hit an intruder in the legs. Briney loaded the gun with a live shell, but he claimed that he did not intend to injure anyone. Katko (plaintiff) and a friend, McDonough, had broken into the abandoned farmhouse on an earlier occasion to steal old bottles and fruit jars for their antique collection. They returned for a second time after the spring gun had been set, and Katko was seriously wounded in the leg when the gun discharged as he entered the bedroom. He then brought action for…

Ms. Gadner was driving her car on the highway when another car driven by Mr. Sneed passed her, sideswiped her, ran her off the road, and drove off. She caught up with Mr. Sneed and forced him to stop. She got out of the car and started to walk to his car when he drove away. When she was walking back to her car, Mr. Otis struck her with his vehicle. Gadner was transported to Bay Hospital, a small rural hospital, where Dr. Dick, a second year pediatric resident, was the attending emergency room physician. Upon arriving at Bay, Gadner's skin was cool and clammy and her blood pressure was 95/55, indicative of shock. Gadner received 200 ml’s per hour of fluid and was x-rayed. She actively requested a transfer because of vaginal bleeding. Nurse Gilbert voiced her own concerns about the need for a transfer to the other nurses in the emergency room, but not to Dr. Dick. Dr. Dick did not order a transfer. Bay is a rural hospital and is not equipped to handle trauma patients with multiple…

Pauline Brown was shot and seriously injured by an unknown assailant in the parking lot of National Supermarkets. Pauline and George Brown brought a negligence action against National, Sentry Security Agency, and T. G. Watkins, a security guard and Sentry employee. Sentry had a security contract with National. The Browns maintained that the defendants have a legal duty to protect National’s customers both in the store and in the parking lot, and that this duty was breached. The defendants denied this allegation. What will the Browns have to prove to prevail? Explain.