Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
17th Edition
ISBN: 9781337094757
Author: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 10Q
Summary Introduction
To discuss: Whether person W recovers for her personal injuries.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Henry is towing two water skiers on the Bandock River with the two experienced water skiers conducting “crossovers” where the skiers pass from side to side across the wake of the towing boat and across each other’s paths. Henry is distracted momentarily and drives too close to a boat moored near the shoreline and to avoid a collision he manoeuvres quickly. In doing so, Megan, one of the water skiers that Henry is towing, is propelled into a pontoon and severely injured. Megan now wants recourse for her physical injuries through the law of negligence.Required:a) Identify the legal issues arising in negligence and advise Megan as to the likelihood of success
Consider the given situation: David was walking through a subway station that was highly
crowded. He took out his handgun and fired it randomly because he liked the sound made
by the firing. Even though David has no intent to shot anyone in the crowd, the shot fired
by him injured Susan. David will be held liable for which type of tort?
a) Negligence
b) Strict liability
c) Intentional tort
d) Recklessness
Answer
Submit
O O O O
One of several motorized barges being used to carry construction material for the project ran aground on a reef near the bridge as it approached a temporary harbor being used as a depot during low tide. The grounded vessel damaged part of the reef and ruptured the internal fuel tank, causing an oil slick.
All nearby maritime traffic had to be halted for several hours as an emergency clean-up crew arrived to control the oil spill and clean the water. Following this, the barge was re-floated approximately 13 hours after grounding and to a dry dock for extensive repairs. A replacement barge had to be brought in on short notice to minimize the additional strain on logistics.
Early inquiries have shown that while the crew was experienced, the helmsman was not a local and was unfamiliar with the waters. Additionally, the depot harbor only had one of the two lights making the entrance operational at the time, despite regulations, and the project’s standards both specifying both were always…
Chapter 8 Solutions
Smith and Roberson’s Business Law
Ch. 8 - Prob. 1COCh. 8 - Prob. 2COCh. 8 - Prob. 3COCh. 8 - Prob. 4COCh. 8 - Prob. 5COCh. 8 - Prob. 1QCh. 8 - Prob. 2QCh. 8 - Prob. 3QCh. 8 - Prob. 4QCh. 8 - Prob. 5Q
Ch. 8 - Prob. 6QCh. 8 - Prob. 7QCh. 8 - Prob. 8QCh. 8 - Prob. 9QCh. 8 - Prob. 10QCh. 8 - Prob. 11CPCh. 8 - Prob. 12CPCh. 8 - Prob. 13CPCh. 8 - Prob. 14CPCh. 8 - Prob. 15CPCh. 8 - Prob. 16CPCh. 8 - Prob. 17CPCh. 8 - Prob. 18CPCh. 8 - Prob. 19CPCh. 8 - Prob. 20CPCh. 8 - Prob. 21CPCh. 8 - Prob. 22CPCh. 8 - Prob. 1TSCh. 8 - Prob. 2TSCh. 8 - Prob. 3TS
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- One of several motorized barges being used to carry construction material for the project ran aground on a reef near the bridge as it approached a temporary harbor being used as a depot during low tide. The grounded vessel damaged part of the reef and ruptured the internal fuel tank, causing an oil slick. All nearby maritime traffic had to be halted for several hours as an emergency clean-up crew arrived to control the oil spill and clean the water. Following this, the barge was re-floated approximately 13 hours after grounding and to a dry dock for extensive repairs. A replacement barge had to be brought in on short notice to minimize the additional strain on logistics. Early inquiries have shown that while the crew was experienced, the helmsman was not a local and was unfamiliar with the waters. Additionally, the depot harbor only had one of the two lights making the entrance operational at the time, despite regulations, and the project’s standards both specifying both were always…arrow_forwardSally's apartment is burglarized while she is on vacation, and a few pieces of jewelry she left at home are stolen. She files an insurance claim, stating that all of her jewelry was taken. Which of the following best describes the act that Sally is engaging in?arrow_forwardDr Lai went to SUPERSAVE supermarket to buy his groceries: he slipped and fell on a puddle of water on one of the aisles. The puddle has been caused by a leaking refrigerator inside the supermarket. The supermarket had a duty to keep the premises safe for its customers, but it had failed to fix the leak. However the supermarket did put up a warning sign near the puddle to alert its customer to beware of its slippery floor. Dr Lai suffered a broken arm from the result of the fall. Analyse the situation and determine wether the supermarket is liable for Dr Lai's injury. Advise wether Dr Lai has the rights to access damages with the supermarket. Include case laws and examples, if relevant.arrow_forward
- Hannah hates her sister Ivana with a passion so Hannah decides to poison her. Ivana drinks the soup that Hannah has poisoned, but for some reason, she does not die. She only experiences a tummy ache and starts vomitting. She is rushed to the hospital but does not die. What kind of crime was committed? Consummated Frustrated Attemptedarrow_forwardA factory worker named Nazrul of ‘Company Levon’ worked on the production line when his glove captures and his arm was drawn into an in-feed conveyor belt. Although the workers managed to pull him free, he suffered two broken bones in his right arm and a dislocated wrist. The employee missed eight weeks of work after the accident, which took place on March 10, 2018. An investigation by the Human Resources Executive of the company revealed that the company had removed a part of the line, thus leaving a gap in the side of the conveyor belt. The worker put his hand inside the hole to recover some trapped lids. It was then when his glove became entangled, and his arm was drawn into a dangerous moving part of the machine. The officer said that it was inadequately guarded. HE also said: “I am pleased that the worker has made a full recovery, but many other employees sustain permanent disability or impairment because machine safety is being neglected.” “Unguarded or poorly guarded machinery…arrow_forwardPablo, a resident of New Mexico, while driving through Arizona, was struck by an SUV driven by Derek, a resident of California. Derek was speeding when the accident happened, and Pablo suffered severe injuries that ruined a potential acting career. Pablo's damages are estimated at $200,000. What type of case is this?arrow_forward
- Walter lives in South Carolina and drives to Maryland to visit his sick mother. He is driving 75 mph while going around Baltimore and his car hits a patch of ice. His car crashes into a car and causes a chain reaction involving 15 other cars and drivers. Fred, who is driving his Lamborghini to the grocery store, suffers damage in the amount of $75,000. Naturally, Fred and the other drivers will sue for damages. There are many drivers involved. With respect to Fred, what will the court’s opinion be as to whether he can sue in Federal Court? Does Fred meet the qualifications? If so, why? If not, why? Discuss thoroughly. (To get full credit, please describe in detail what is required for jurisdiction in federal court. Then apply the facts given to you to see if the requirements are met. Then, answer the final questions explaining your conclusions.)arrow_forwardA factory worker named Nazrul of ‘Company Levon’ worked on the production line when his glove captures and his arm was drawn into an in-feed conveyor belt. Although the workers managed to pull him free, he suffered two broken bones in his right arm and a dislocated wrist. The employee missed eight weeks of work after the accident, which took place on March 10, 2018. An investigation by the Human Resources Executive of the company revealed that the company had removed a part of the line, thus leaving a gap in the side of the conveyor belt. The worker put his hand inside the hole to recover some trapped lids. It was then when his glove became entangled, and his arm was drawn into a dangerous moving part of the machine. The officer said that it was inadequately guarded. HE also said: “I am pleased that the worker has made a full recovery, but many other employees sustain permanent disability or impairment because machine safety is being neglected.” “Unguarded or poorly guarded machinery…arrow_forwardWalter lives in South Carolina and drives to Maryland to visit his sick mother. He is driving 75 mph while going around Baltimore and his car hits a patch of ice. His car crashes into a car and causes a chain reaction involving 15 other cars and drivers. Fred, who is driving his Lamborghini to the grocery store, suffers damage in the amount of $75,000. Naturally, Fred and the other drivers will sue for damages. There are many drivers involved. With respect to Fred, what will the court’s opinion be as to whether he can sue in Federal Court? Does Fred meet the qualifications? If so, why? If not, why? Discuss thoroughly.arrow_forward
- A gasoline-powered lawn mower that had been used earlier to cut grass was left unattended next to a water heater that had been manufactured by Sears. Expert testimony was presented to demonstrate that vapors from the mower’s gas tank accumulated under the water heater and resulted in an explosion. Three-year-old Shawn Toups was injured as a result. Evidence was also presented negating any claim that Shawn had been handling the gasoline can located nearby or the lawn mower. He was not burned on the soles of his feet or the palms of his hands, and, similarly, the gas can remained in an upright position even after the explosion. Is Sears liable to the Toups in strict product liability? Explain.arrow_forwardBarbara Rome entered Flower Memorial Hospital to undergo a series of X-rays. When she was ready for the X-rays, she was assisted by a student radiological intern. The intern placed Rome on the X-ray table and strapped her onto the table correctly; however, the intern did not properly fasten the footboard, which was located at the foot of the table. As a result of this error, Rome fell and was hurt when the table was raised. As a consequence, Rome brought a lawsuit against Flower Memorial Hospital, alleging that the ordinary negligence of the intern had caused her injury. In contrast, the hospital argued that the lawsuit involved a medical claim, as defined under the state’s medical malpractice statute. Whether a case involves ordinary negligence or a medical claim would determine whether the state’s two-year statute of limitations for negligence or the state’s one-year statute of limitations for medical claims would apply. This case clearly involves a difference of opinion on the…arrow_forwardAt approximately 4:00 A.M. on July 14, 2000, a woman wearing a mask and pointing a firearm demanded that 7-Eleven employees at a store in Berkeley County, West Virginia, give her the store’s money. Antonio Feliciano was working that morning as a sales clerk. While other employees emptied the cash register and the woman was focused on them, Feliciano grabbed and disarmed her. He continued to restrain the would-be robber until local law enforcement authorities arrived on the scene and apprehended her. No one was physically injured in the incident. Nevertheless, shortly thereafter, 7-Eleven terminated Feliciano’s at-will employment. 7-Eleven explained to Feliciano that he was being fired because he violated a company policy that prohibits employees from subduing a robber or otherwise interfering with a store robbery. Feliciano subsequently filed a lawsuit against 7-Eleven alleging that he had been wrongfully discharged in contravention of the West Virginia public policy favoring an…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding BusinessManagementISBN:9781259929434Author:William NickelsPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134527604Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. CoulterPublisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...ManagementISBN:9781305947412Author:Cliff RagsdalePublisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...ManagementISBN:9780135191798Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. LaudonPublisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...ManagementISBN:9780134728391Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. GriffinPublisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)ManagementISBN:9780134237473Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De CenzoPublisher:PEARSON
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:9781259929434
Author:William Nickels
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134527604
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract...
Management
ISBN:9781305947412
Author:Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi...
Management
ISBN:9780135191798
Author:Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in...
Management
ISBN:9780134728391
Author:Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:9780134237473
Author:Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:PEARSON