Person D reached at land M in order to bowl in her association game. The space of bowling backstreet’s enclosed with ice and snow. Person D saw that the side walk was freezing. After three competitions of bowling she drunk three beers and proceeds footway to her car. Then she slid and trying to catch herself by reaching near by her car and fell. She hurt a fracture through the fell. Person D prosecuted against lanes M looking for compensations for her wounds. Lanes deprived of responsibility for person D’s personal wounds. To discuss: The arguments supporting lane M’s denial of responsibility for person D’s injuries.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 2TS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person D reached at land M in order to bowl in her association game. The space of bowling backstreet’s enclosed with ice and snow. Person D saw that the side walk was freezing. After three competitions of bowling she drunk three beers and proceeds footway to her car. Then she slid and trying to catch herself by reaching near by her car and fell. She hurt a fracture through the fell. Person D prosecuted against lanes M looking for compensations for her wounds. Lanes deprived of responsibility for person D’s personal wounds.

To discuss: The arguments supporting lane M’s denial of responsibility for person D’s injuries.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Under what circumstances should a principal (employer) be responsible for the torts committed by an agent (employee)? If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what circumstances should the agent be held personally liable? Provide an example to illustrate your opinion. What ethical considerations underlie the doctrine of respondeat superior?

1. Should George have accepted the listing? George states, “I am not discriminating. The owners are the guilty party.” Can george filter potential buyers by credit score? By race? 2. Now that George has accepted the listing, could he be guilty of fair housing violations by association? Could he be innocent because he is only “following orders”?

Brandt Crossing Investments, Inc., was a family-owned property investment organization, investing in undeveloped properties when prices were low and then selling them when prices went up. Among its holdings, Brandt Crossing owned fifty acres of undeveloped land next to another fifty acres of undeveloped land owned by Khloe Hadid. Carter Rios, property manager for Brandt Crossing, approached Hadid and offered to purchase her fifty acres “for Brandt.” Hadid sold the property for $50,000. Within one year, Brandt Crossing sold its 100 acres, including the property bought from Hadid, to a developer for $1,000,000. Richard Brandt, a 5% owner of Brandt Crossing Investments and an old high school acquaintance of Hadid, saw her at the mall and told her of the recent sale. Furious that she had lost out on the income and convinced that Rios had misled her, Hadid sued Richard Brandt for the acts of his agent, Rios. Hadid argued that the facts were sufficient to create an agency by estoppel…