Person H fell on the grocery store HE due to the puddle of water. The manager of store was aware of the puddle and tried to mope this numerous times. Person H takes an action to recuperate compensations for wounds sustained in the fall. To discuss: Whether store is negligent in its conduct.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 8, Problem 11CP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

Person H fell on the grocery store HE due to the puddle of water. The manager of store was aware of the puddle and tried to mope this numerous times. Person H takes an action to recuperate compensations for wounds sustained in the fall.

To discuss: Whether store is negligent in its conduct.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Hawkins slipped and fell on a puddle of water just inside the automatic door to the H. E. Butt Grocery Company’s store. The water had been tracked into the store by customers and blown through the door by a strong wind. The store manager was aware of the puddle and had mopped it up several times earlier in the day. Still, no signs had been placed to warn store patrons of the danger. Hawkins brought an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in the fall. Was the store negligent in its conduct?

Negligent in failing to give warning of the approach of its train to a crossing, CC Railroad thereby endangers Larry, a blind man who is about to cross. Mildred, a bystander, in a reasonable effort to save Larry, rushes onto the track to push Larry out of danger. Although Mildred acts as carefully as possible, she is struck and injured by the train. a. Can Mildred recover from Larry? b. Can Mildred recover from CC Railroad?

Judith Studebaker was injured when a van owned and driven by James Ferry collided with her vehicle. On the morning of the incident, Ferry made his usual runs for the florist for whom he delivered flowers, Nettie’s Flower Garden. He had made a slight detour prior to the accident to conduct personal business at a pawnshop and was returning to the flower shop at the time of the accident. Nettie’s set standards for Ferry’s dress and conduct, determined his territory, and set standards for his van. Studebaker brought an action against Nettie’s on a respondeat superior theory on the belief that Ferry was Nettie’s employee at the time of the accident. Nettie's defended that Ferry was an independent contractor, not an employee. Decide.Please answer is the IRAC format Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis:…