Two reasons for a visual binary star to be unlikely to be also a spectroscopic binary star.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 72Q

To determine

Two reasons for a visual binary star to be unlikely to be also a spectroscopic binary star.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

We will take a moment to compare how brightly a white dwarf star shines compared to a red giant star. For the sake of this problem, lets assume a white dwarf has a temperature roughly twice as large as a red giant star. As for their stellar radii, the white dwarf has a radius about 1/10000th that of a red giant star. With this in mind, how does the luminosity of a red giant star compare to that of a white dwarf? (Put differently, find the ratio of their luminosities a.k.a. how many times more luminous is the red giant than the white dwarf? An answer of less than 1 means the white dwarf is more luminous, an answer of 1 means they have the same luminosity, and an answer greater than 1 means the red giant is more lu

An O8 V star has an apparent visual magnitude of +5. Use the method of spectroscopic parallax to estimate the distance to the star (in pc). (Hints: Refer to one of the H–R diagrams in the chapter, and use the magnitude–distance formula, d = 10(mV − MV + 5)/5 where d is the distance in parsecs, mV and MV are the apparent and absolute visual magnitude respectively.)

One way to calculate the radius of a star is to use its luminosity and temperature and assume that the star radiates approximately like a blackbody. Astronomers have measured the characteristics of central stars of planetary nebulae and have found that a typical central star is 16 times as luminous and 20 times as hot (about 110,000 K) as the Sun. Find the radius in terms of the Sun’s. How does this radius compare with that of a typical white dwarf?