Survey Of Accounting
Survey Of Accounting
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781259631122
Author: Edmonds, Thomas P.
Publisher: Mcgraw-hill Education,
bartleby

Videos

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 13, Problem 29P

a.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company SB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

AvoidableCost=[UnitMaterialCost+UnitLaborCost+UnitOverheadCost+SupervisorSalary+OpportunityCost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($35×20,000)+($42.50×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$700,000+$850,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$2,122,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit

AvoidableCostperunit=[TotalAvoidableCostNumberofUnits]=[$2,122,00020,000]=$106.10

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $106.10.

Determine the increase in income

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

IncreaseinIncome=[NumberofUnits×(AvoidableCostperunitPurchasePrice)]=[20,000×($106.10$92.50)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $106.10 is greater than the purchase cost of $92.50. Hence, Company SB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company SB should outsource the bike frames.

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment

AvoidableCostOldEquipment=[UnitLaborCost+OpportunityCost]=[($42.50×20,000)+$70,000]=$920,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $920,000.

Determine the unit level labor costs

UnitLevelLaborCosts=[ActualLaborCost×(1ChangeinLaborCost)]=[$42.50×(160%)]=$17

Therefore the unit level labor cost is $17.

Determine the depreciation cost

DepreciationCost=[CostofNewEquipmentSalvageValueNumberofYears]=[$910,000$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment

AvoidableCostNewEquipment=[UnitLaborCost+DepreciationCost]=[($17×20,000)+$210,000]=$550,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $550,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment

CostperunitOldEquipment=[AvoidableCostOldEquipmentNumberofUnits]=[$920,00020,000]=$46

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $46.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment

CostperunitNewEquipment=[AvoidableCostNewEquipmentNumberofUnits]=[$550,00020,000]=$27.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $27.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment

AvoidableCostOldEquipment=[AvoidableCostOldEquipmentAvoidableCostNewEquipment]=[$920,000$550,000]=$370,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $370,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $370,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $370,000.

Therefore Company SB should replace the current equipment.

c.

To determine

Whether Company SB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment)

AvoidableCost=[UnitMaterialCost+UnitLaborCost+UnitOverheadCost+SupervisorSalary+DepreciationExpense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($35×20,000)+($17×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$700,000+$340,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,752,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,752,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment)

Costperunit=[AvoidableCostNumberofUnits]=[$1,752,00020,000]=$87.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $87.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives

Difference=[ActualCostCostperunit]=[$92.50$87.60]=$4.90

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $4.90.

Determine the increase in profitability

IncreaseinProfitability=[NumberofUnits×DifferenceinCostperunit]=[$4.90×20,000]=$98,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $98,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $87.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $4.90 per frame and the increase in profitability is $98,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company SB should replace the old equipment.

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company SB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company SB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company SB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company SB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company SB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company SB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company SB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favored customer standing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Exercise 6-13A (Algo) Outsourcing decision affected by opportunity costs LO 6-3 Rooney Electronics currently produces the shipping containers it uses to deliver the electronics products it sells. The monthly cost of producing 9,300 containers follows. Unit-level materials Unit-level labor Unit-level overhead Product-level costs* Allocated facility-level costs $ 5,100 6,700 3,400 8,700 27,500 *One-third of these costs can be avoided by purchasing the containers. Russo Container Company has offered to sell comparable containers to Rooney for $2.50 each. Required a. Calculate the total relevant cost. Should Rooney continue to make the containers? b. Rooney could lease the space it currently uses in the manufacturing process. If leasing would produce $12,300 per month, calculate the total avoidable costs. Should Rooney continue to make the containers? a. Total relevant cost a. Should Rooney continue to make the containers? b. Total avoidable cost Yes b. Should Rooney continue to make the…
Exercise 12-8A (Algo) Allocating costs among products LO 12-3 Rundle Construction Company expects to build three new homes during a specific accounting period. The estimated direct materials and labor costs are as follows. Expected Costs Direct labor Direct materials Home 1 $ 75,000 91,000 Home 2 $ 106,000 139,000 Home 3 $ 172,000 195,000 Assume Rundle needs to allocate two major overhead costs ($35,300 of employee fringe benefits and $21,250 of indirect materials costs) among the three jobs. Required Choose an appropriate cost driver for each of the overhead costs and determine the total cost of each house. Note: Round "Allocation rate" to 2 decimal places. Fringe Benefits: Home Allocation Rate × Weight of Base = Allocated Cost 1 = 2 x = 3 x = Total Indirect Materials: Home Allocation Rate × Weight of Base = Allocated Cost 1 x = 2 × = 3 x Total The cost components to determine the total cost of each house: Expected Costs Direct labor Direct materials Fringe benefits Indirect materials…
Problem 4 - Average with Lost Units The Salty Mgf. Co. operates three producing departments A, B and C. It uses the weighted average costi8ng method . The following data are on the production of Department B for October, 2021:                                                                                                                       Added in Department B                                                          Units                Transfer in              Materials           Conversion                                                      (in Pesos)                (in Pesos)            Cost (PhP) In process, Oct. 1                            5,000                   9,990                        1,020                    998  Received from Department A     20,000                 39,010                     21,855                 21,877 Total                                                 25,000 Transferred out                              19,000 Normal Loss…

Chapter 13 Solutions

Survey Of Accounting

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Accounting
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Financial & Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:9781337119207
Author:Carl Warren, James M. Reeve, Jonathan Duchac
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Relevant Costing Explained; Author: Kaplan UK;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnsh3hlJAkI;License: Standard Youtube License