Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN: 9781305506381
Author: James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 11E
To determine
To describe:The relationship between Nash concept of best reply response and avoiding the maximum regret.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
For Question 13, consider a game in which the "Best Response Arrows" are as illustrated below. Further, payoffs for
each player from the strategy choices of "E/G" and "F/H" are also indicted: if Player 1 chooses E and Player 2 chooses
G, then both players get a payoff of x>0; if Player I chooses F and Player 2 chooses H, then both players get a payoff
of y> 0.
13.
Player 1
E
F
Player 2
H
#E ↓
G
x,x
y.y
Based upon the Best Response Arrows and payoffs indicated above, this game
A.
does not fit the definition of a Prisoner's Dilemma for any values of x and y.
B.
fits the definition of a Prisoner's Dilemma for all values of x and y.
C.
fits the definition of a Prisoner's Dilemma for x y.
Consider the strategic form game below: Suppose that both players have a discount factor of
\delta = 3/4. Can a strategy profile of both players using grim trigger strategies be
sustained in the game where the strategic form game above is repeated infinitely? Show all
calculations and explain your answer
Consider the strategic form game below:
Column
Cooperate
Defect
Row
Cooperate
Defect
8,8
0, 10
10,0
3,3
Using the payoff matrix, suppose this game is infinitely repeated and that the interest rate is sufficiently “low.” Identify trigger strategies that permit players 1 and 2 to earn equilibrium payoffs of 140 and 180, respectively, in each period
Chapter 13 Solutions
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The order of play tends to matter in sequential games where rivals must predict best reply-responses and counter-responses in order to achieve a desired payoff. Discuss an instance in which you or your firm used game theory and explain why the relationship between the players was a strategic one. Did the use of a credible threat or commitment affect the outcome? Were there any first-mover of fast-second strategies used?arrow_forwardA) What is the suitable strategy that best describe "prisoner dilemma" above? B) What is the most likelihood of decisions will be made by Ronaldo and Gonzalo?In which quadrant? Why they think that the decision is the best option for them?arrow_forwardIn a game theory payoff matrix. Your company (A) and a major competitor (B) havetwo potential strategies: to advertise or to not advertise during the Super Bowl. The payoffs in each cell represent the change in firm profits from advertising. How would you create payoffs in each cell such that the Nash equilibrium is that both firms advertise despite having a higher profit if neither firm advertisedarrow_forward
- Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to take a dangerous performance enhancing drug. If one athlete takes the drug, and the other does not, the one who takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neither take the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking the drug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a loss of X dollars. a) Draw a 2×2 payoff matrix describing the decisions the athletes face. b) For what X is taking the drug the Nash equilibrium? c) Does making the drug safer (that is, lowering X) make the athletes better or worse off? Explain.arrow_forwardWhat is the payoff to player 2 under the strategy profile (AK,D,FL) in this game?What is the payoff to player 3 under the strategy profile (BK,C,FM) in this game?arrow_forwardIn penalty shoot-outs, the Nash Equilibrium strategies of goalies and players depend on how important the game is. In more important games, the Nash Equilibrium will favor low-risk strategies since players are risk-averse. True Falsearrow_forward
- Consider the following 3-player static game with row player Batman (his choices are a and b), column player Catwoman (her choices are c and d), and matrix player Joker (his choices are left, middle and right). In the payoff triples the first entry is Batman's payoff, the second entry is Catwoman's payoff, and the third entry is Joker's payoff. left middle right d d d a 1,1,5 1,0,1 a 1,1,3 1,0,0 a 1,1,0 1,0,0 0,0,0 0,1,0 0,0,0 0,1,3 b 0,0,0 0,1,5 (a) Give a belief for Joker about his opponents' choice combinations that supports his choice of middle (i.e. such that middle is optimal for him). (b) Solve the game with iterated strict dominance. (c) Construct an epistemic model such that, for every choice found in (b) there exists a type such that: • the choice is optimal for the type, • and the type expresses common belief in rationality.arrow_forward1. Consider the following game, which has been loosely based on the trust models studied in class. For the purposes of this game, focus on pure-strategies only. Each agent moves simultaneously. Agent 1 can take either action T, M or B, whereas Agent 2 can take actions L, C, or R. The payoffs are shown in the following normal form game. 1 T M B L 5,5 7,1 0,0 2 C 1,7 4,4 0,0 R 0,0 0,0 1,1 a. Outline and explain the Nash equilibria if the game is played once. (Again, focus only on pure-strategy equilibria.) b. Now consider the case when the game is played twice. That is, in the first period at the firm, Agents 1 and 2 simultaneously choose their actions. Their choices are revealed before in the second period, again the agents simultaneously choose their actions. Then the game ends. There is no discounting of payoffs between periods.arrow_forwardIs it possible that Step. 3 contains a contradiction? As "If Player 1 plays Ball (B): Player 2 meets (M) if the expected payoff of meeting is greater than the expected payoff of avoiding." and then, "If Player 1 has Dinner (D): Player 2 meets (M) if the expected payoff of meeting is greater than the expected payoff of avoiding." The same arises in the one for player 2. Is for both the second sentence meant to be "smaller than"? If not, please elaborate.arrow_forward
- Find the optimal strategies, P and Q, for the row and column players, respectively. -5 2 3 -8 P = Q = Compute the expected payoff E of the matrix game if the players use their optimal strategies. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) E =arrow_forwardDetermine the optimal strategy for the situation by representing it as a game and finding the saddle point. State your final answer in the terms of the original question.A Republican and a Democratic candidate are running for office in a heavily Republican county. A recent newspaper poll comparing their views on taxes and welfare reform showed that when compared on taxes or on welfare reform, the Republican leads by 20%. When comparing the Democrat on welfare reform to the Republican on taxes, the Republican leads by 35%. But when comparing the Democrat on taxes to the Republican on welfare reform, the Republican leads by only 15%. Use this information to decide what each candidate should discuss at their next debate. (Let T represent taxes and W represent welfare reform.) Democrat T W Republican T W % % % % =arrow_forwardNow answer the following questions: Perform iterative elimination of dominated strategies on the game. Draw the new table for each iteration as shown in the lecture video. Write corresponding actions at left and up of the table. Explain why are you removing each row or column. You should reach a 2*2 game. Rewrite the table separately. From the 2*2 game you get in question 1, find a mixed strategy σ1=(p,1−p) for Player 1 that will make Player 2 indifferent about two actions. Find a mixed strategy σ2=(q,1−q) for Player 2 that will make Player 1 indifferent about two actions. If the players are playing the mixed strategies σ1 and σ2, they both will indifferent about their strategies, hence the strategy profile (σ1,σ2) will be a Nash Equilibrium of this game. Find the expected utility for both Player 1 u1(σ1,σ2) and Player 2 u2(σ1,σ2) at this Nash Equilibrium.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning