When comparing two firms operating as a cartel/colluding and two firms competing in Cournot competition, given the firms face the same inverse market demand and marginal cost is the same for both firms in either situation, which of the following is true? O a. The total profit is the same in Cournot competition and collusion. O b. Total output is higher in collusion than in Cournot competition and the price is lower in collusion than in Cournot Competition. Oc. The total profit is lower in Cournot competition than in collusion. O d. Total output is lower in collusion than in Cournot competition and the price is higher in collusion than in Cournot Competition.

When comparing two firms operating as a cartel/colluding and two firms competing in Cournot competition, given the firms face the same inverse market demand and marginal cost is the same for both firms in either situation, which of the following is true? O a. The total profit is the same in Cournot competition and collusion. O b. Total output is higher in collusion than in Cournot competition and the price is lower in collusion than in Cournot Competition. Oc. The total profit is lower in Cournot competition than in collusion. O d. Total output is lower in collusion than in Cournot competition and the price is higher in collusion than in Cournot Competition.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter10: Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 18CTQ: When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the curve in the figure below, which shows the market demand. marginal cost, and marginal revenue curve for firms in an oligopolistic industry. In this example, we assume firms have zero fixed costs. Suppose the firms collude to form a cartel. What price will the cartel charge? What quantity will the cartel supply? How much profit will the cartel earn? Suppose now that the cane] breaks up and the oligopolistic firms compete as vigorously as possible by cutting the price and increasing sales. What will be the industry quantity and price? What will be the collective profits of all firms in the industry? Compare the equilibrium price, quantity, and profit for the cartel and cutthroat competition outcomes.
When OPEC raised the price of oil dramatically in the mid-1970s, experts said it was unlikely that the cartel could stay together over the long term-that the incentives for individual members. to cheat would become too strong. More than fort),r years later, OPEC still exists. Why do you think OPEC has been able to beat the odds and continue to collude? Hint: You may wish to consider non-economic reasons.
mether to produce a low output or a high output. nese output strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the ayoff matrix to the right. Kuwait's profits are in red and Saudi Arabia's are in blue. Suppose the two countries form a cartel. What is the cooperative equilibrium? Kuwait O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. Low Output High Output O B. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. $125 $75 Low Output O C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. $8 $13 Saudi Arabia O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. $98 $70 E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to broduce a low output and Kuwait to produce a low output. High Output What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? O A. The Nash equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high…
The Competition Bureau in Canada wants to increase competition and reduce monopoly power. Thus it it worries about industry concentration in Canada. Let's assume that the Canadian halibut processing industry there are only two firms(duopoly). Under such a market structure, if one of the halibut processing firm increases its price, then the other firm in the halibut processing industry can: keep the price of its processed halibut constant and thus increase its market share. keep its price of its processed halibut constant and thus decrease its market share. decrease its price of its processed halibut and thus decrease its market share. try to achieve economies of scale. increase its price of its processed halibut and thus increase its market share.
Consider a town in which only two residents, Raphael and Susan, own wells that produce water safe for drinking. Raphael and Susan can pump and sell as much water as they want at no cost. For them, total revenue equals profit. The following table shows the town's demand schedule for water. Price (Dollars per gallon) 3.60 Quantity Demanded Total Revenue (Gallons of water) (Dollars) 3.30 35 $115.50 $210.00 $283.50 $336.00 3.00 70 2.70 105 2.40 140 2.10 175 $367.50 1.80 210 $378.00 1.50 245 $367.50 1.20 280 $336.00 0.90 315 $283.50 0.60 350 $210.00 0.30 385 $115.50 420 Suppose Raphael and Susan form a cartel and behave as a monopolist. The profit-maximizing price is s agreement, Raphael and Susan agree to split production equally. Therefore, Raphael's profit is per gallon, and the total output is gallons. As part of their cartel and Susan's profit is s Suppose that Raphael and Susan have been successfully operating as a cartel. They each charge the monopoly price and sell half of the…
Economics How would the Coumot equilibrium change in the airine example if American's marginal cost were $100 and United's were $2007 The demand the duopoly quantity-setting firms face is Q- 339 -p with an inverse demand function of p- 339-19A1qu- where qa is the quantity produced by American and qu is the quantity produced by United. The Cournot-Nash equilibrium occurs where qa equals and qu equals (enter numeric responses using integers)
bok rint An oligopoly producing a homogeneous product is comprised of three firms that act like a cartel. Assume that these three firms have identical cost schedules. Assume also that if any one of these firms sets a price for the product, the other two firms charge the same price. As long as they all charge the same price they will share the market equally; and the quantity demanded of each will be the same. Below is the total-cost schedule of one of these firms and the demand schedule that confronts it when the other firms charge the same price as this firm. Complete the marginal-cost and marginal- revenue schedules facing the firm. erences Mc Graw Hill Output Total cost Marginal cost Price Quantity demanded Marginal revenue 0 1 23456 7 8 $0 180 300 480 720 1,020 1,380 1,800 2,280 Short Anewor LA JUL 26 $780 720 660 600 540 480 420 360 Toolbar navigation (a) What price would be charged, what output would be produced, and what profit would be made by this firm? (b) If the firms…
consider the market for oil. Suppose for simplicity that there are only two oil roducing countries-Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Both countries must choose hether to produce a low output or a high output. These output strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the ayoff matrix to the right. Kuwait's profits are in red and Saudi Arabia's are in blue. Kuwait Suppose the two countries form a cartel. What is the cooperative equilibrium? Low Output High Output O A. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a high output. $125 $75 Low Output $8 $13 O B. A cooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game. O C. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a low output and Kuwait to produce a high output. Saudi Arabia $98 $70 O D. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce a high output and Kuwait to produce a low output. High Output $5 $8 O E. The cooperative equilibrium is for Saudi Arabia to produce…
Explain what is Oligopoly and duopoly? Are firms in Oligopoly large firms or small firms? What is product differentiation, price discrimination and profit maximization under Oligopoly? Give two examples each of product differentiation and price discrimination. What is the optimum point of production and minimum cost point of a firm under Oligopoly? Explain and draw AR and MR curves as (a) kinked demand curve; (b) Collusion (cartels) and (c) Price leadership model.
2. Deviating from the collusive outcome Stargell and Schmidt are brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.80 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Stargell and Schmidt form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Stargell and Schmidt choose to work together. ? PRICE (Dollars per can) 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 ༞ ༔ ༔ ༔ ༔ ༔ ༔ ༔ ༔ ༔ Demand MR MC = ATC 0 0 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) + Monopoly Outcome When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce charge $ per can.…
2. Deviating from the collusive outcome Stargell and Schmidt are brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.20 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Stargell and Schmidt form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Stargell and Schmidt choose to work together. PRICE (Dolars per can) 1.00 090 080 0.70 080 0.50 6.40 0.30 0:30 6.10 0 Demand D 20 40 MR 60 00 100 120 140 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) MC ATC 140 160 200 Monopoly Outcome
2. Deviating from the collusive outcome Stargell and Schmidt are brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.20 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Stargell and Schmidt form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Stargell and Schmidt choose to work together. PRICE (Dollars per can) 1.00 0.90 080 0.70 0.60 0.50 0:40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 Demand 20 40 MC ATC MR 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce information, each firm earns a daily profit of S…