Pro A ABCA9 ALYREF ATIC CCDC28A CDC6 CDC7 CDCA7 CMIP DPP10 Acidaminococcus Bilophila Butyricimonas Christensenellaceae Clostridium Fusobacterium Haemophilus Oscillospira Pseudomonas Ruminococcaceae Sutterella Veillonella B TAT ZNHITE ABCAS GINS2 CCDC28A PAICS CDCA7 Butyricimonas Biloph GINS1 EIF3J GONT4 TMEM97 DPP10 PTGFA LOR1 Haemophilus Clostridium Acidaminococcus UCP3 FAM1118 Veillonella 0.75 MCM4 KIRREL3 MON1 ZC3H12A TFAM TEX10 UNG Christenseng ceas CDC6 Ruminococcaceae DUOX2 DUOXA2 0.5 IF3J Pseudomonas LCN2 Fusobacterium DUOXA2 ATIC LAPPAC MUCSAC FAM 118 CDCT RPLP2 CMIP FAM120C TRHDE DUOX2 TICAM1 GCNT4 Oscillospira HELLS NUDCD1 GINS1 FAM120C GINS2 0.25 NUDT14 NAPSA GSTO1 HELLS C rho=-0.675,q=0.083 rho -0.772.q=0.04 ILDR1 KIRREL3 LCN2 LRPPRC MCM4 MDN1 MRPL17 MUC5AC DUOX2 NAPSA NUDCD1 NUDT14 PAICS PPP1R14B PTGFR RPLP2 SESN3 TAT TBX10 TFAM TICAM1 TMEM97 TRHDE UCP3 -0.25 -0.5 -0.75 ZNHIT6 2.00 1.75 Christensenellaceae rho 0.759,q=0.045 UNG ZC3H12A ZNHIT6 B -1 DUOXA2 LCN2 Ruminococcaceae rho-0.698.q=0.082 0.0 -5.0 -25 Butyricimonas -75-50 -25 Veillonella 6.0 Fig. 3 Interactions between genes associated with colorectal cancer and gut mucosal microbes. a Correlation plot depicting gene-microbe correlations. Color and size of the squares indicate the magnitude of the correlation, asterisks indicate significance of correlation (* indicates q value <0.05 and indicates q value <0.1). b Network visualizing significant gene-microbe correlations (solid edges, q value <0.1) and significant microbe-microbe correlations (dashed edges, SparCC IRI>=0.1 and p value <0.05). Blue edges indicate positive correlation and red edges indicate negative correlation. Edge thickness represents the strength of the correlation. c Scatterplots depicting pattern of grouping by cystic fibrosis (red) and healthy (blue) samples in a few representative gene-microbe correlations, where the strength of correlation (Spearman rho) and significance (q) is indicated at the top of each plot and dashed edges represent microbe-microbe correla- tions. This subnetwork of microbe-microbe correlations depicts correlated abundance changes in the microbiome as a function of their presence (Fig. 3b, dashed edges). For instance, Bilophila and Butyricimonas are both de- pleted in CF (q value <0.05), and the abundance of the two genera is also correlated across individuals (SparCC R-05 pseudo p value=0.04) On the other hand solid edges), microbial nodes have more edges on aver- age compared to genes, where Christensenellaceae and Clostridium formed distinct hubs in the network. This potentially implies that these microbes and their path- ways are shared across multiple GI cancer-associated genes. Of note, Bilophila, Clostridium, and Pseudomonas are mostly negatively correlated with Gl cancer genes, while Haemophilus Oscillasnina Veillonella Eusobacter

Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap Course List)
15th Edition
ISBN:9781337408332
Author:Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa Starr
Publisher:Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa Starr
Chapter21: Protists- The Simplest Eukaryotes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 9SQ
icon
Related questions
Question
What do the solid and dotted lines in figure 3B indicate?
Pro
A
ABCA9
ALYREF
ATIC
CCDC28A
CDC6
CDC7
CDCA7
CMIP
DPP10
Acidaminococcus
Bilophila
Butyricimonas
Christensenellaceae
Clostridium
Fusobacterium
Haemophilus
Oscillospira
Pseudomonas
Ruminococcaceae
Sutterella
Veillonella
B
TAT ZNHITE
ABCAS
GINS2
CCDC28A
PAICS
CDCA7
Butyricimonas
Biloph
GINS1
EIF3J
GONT4
TMEM97
DPP10
PTGFA
LOR1
Haemophilus
Clostridium
Acidaminococcus
UCP3
FAM1118
Veillonella
0.75
MCM4
KIRREL3
MON1
ZC3H12A
TFAM
TEX10
UNG
Christenseng ceas
CDC6
Ruminococcaceae
DUOX2
DUOXA2
0.5
IF3J
Pseudomonas LCN2
Fusobacterium DUOXA2
ATIC
LAPPAC
MUCSAC
FAM 118
CDCT
RPLP2
CMIP
FAM120C
TRHDE
DUOX2 TICAM1
GCNT4
Oscillospira
HELLS NUDCD1
GINS1
FAM120C
GINS2
0.25
NUDT14
NAPSA
GSTO1
HELLS
C
rho=-0.675,q=0.083
rho -0.772.q=0.04
ILDR1
KIRREL3
LCN2
LRPPRC
MCM4
MDN1
MRPL17
MUC5AC
DUOX2
NAPSA
NUDCD1
NUDT14
PAICS
PPP1R14B
PTGFR
RPLP2
SESN3
TAT
TBX10
TFAM
TICAM1
TMEM97
TRHDE
UCP3
-0.25
-0.5
-0.75
ZNHIT6
2.00
1.75
Christensenellaceae
rho 0.759,q=0.045
UNG
ZC3H12A
ZNHIT6
B
-1
DUOXA2
LCN2
Ruminococcaceae
rho-0.698.q=0.082
0.0
-5.0 -25
Butyricimonas
-75-50 -25
Veillonella
6.0
Fig. 3 Interactions between genes associated with colorectal cancer and gut mucosal microbes. a Correlation plot depicting gene-microbe
correlations. Color and size of the squares indicate the magnitude of the correlation, asterisks indicate significance of correlation (* indicates q
value <0.05 and indicates q value <0.1). b Network visualizing significant gene-microbe correlations (solid edges, q value <0.1) and significant
microbe-microbe correlations (dashed edges, SparCC IRI>=0.1 and p value <0.05). Blue edges indicate positive correlation and red edges
indicate negative correlation. Edge thickness represents the strength of the correlation. c Scatterplots depicting pattern of grouping by cystic
fibrosis (red) and healthy (blue) samples in a few representative gene-microbe correlations, where the strength of correlation (Spearman rho) and
significance (q) is indicated at the top of each plot
and dashed edges represent microbe-microbe correla-
tions. This subnetwork of microbe-microbe correlations
depicts correlated abundance changes in the microbiome
as a function of their presence (Fig. 3b, dashed edges).
For instance, Bilophila and Butyricimonas are both de-
pleted in CF (q value <0.05), and the abundance of the
two genera is also correlated across individuals (SparCC
R-05 pseudo p value=0.04) On the other hand
solid edges), microbial nodes have more edges on aver-
age compared to genes, where Christensenellaceae and
Clostridium formed distinct hubs in the network. This
potentially implies that these microbes and their path-
ways are shared across multiple GI cancer-associated
genes. Of note, Bilophila, Clostridium, and Pseudomonas
are mostly negatively correlated with Gl cancer genes,
while Haemophilus Oscillasnina Veillonella Eusobacter
Transcribed Image Text:Pro A ABCA9 ALYREF ATIC CCDC28A CDC6 CDC7 CDCA7 CMIP DPP10 Acidaminococcus Bilophila Butyricimonas Christensenellaceae Clostridium Fusobacterium Haemophilus Oscillospira Pseudomonas Ruminococcaceae Sutterella Veillonella B TAT ZNHITE ABCAS GINS2 CCDC28A PAICS CDCA7 Butyricimonas Biloph GINS1 EIF3J GONT4 TMEM97 DPP10 PTGFA LOR1 Haemophilus Clostridium Acidaminococcus UCP3 FAM1118 Veillonella 0.75 MCM4 KIRREL3 MON1 ZC3H12A TFAM TEX10 UNG Christenseng ceas CDC6 Ruminococcaceae DUOX2 DUOXA2 0.5 IF3J Pseudomonas LCN2 Fusobacterium DUOXA2 ATIC LAPPAC MUCSAC FAM 118 CDCT RPLP2 CMIP FAM120C TRHDE DUOX2 TICAM1 GCNT4 Oscillospira HELLS NUDCD1 GINS1 FAM120C GINS2 0.25 NUDT14 NAPSA GSTO1 HELLS C rho=-0.675,q=0.083 rho -0.772.q=0.04 ILDR1 KIRREL3 LCN2 LRPPRC MCM4 MDN1 MRPL17 MUC5AC DUOX2 NAPSA NUDCD1 NUDT14 PAICS PPP1R14B PTGFR RPLP2 SESN3 TAT TBX10 TFAM TICAM1 TMEM97 TRHDE UCP3 -0.25 -0.5 -0.75 ZNHIT6 2.00 1.75 Christensenellaceae rho 0.759,q=0.045 UNG ZC3H12A ZNHIT6 B -1 DUOXA2 LCN2 Ruminococcaceae rho-0.698.q=0.082 0.0 -5.0 -25 Butyricimonas -75-50 -25 Veillonella 6.0 Fig. 3 Interactions between genes associated with colorectal cancer and gut mucosal microbes. a Correlation plot depicting gene-microbe correlations. Color and size of the squares indicate the magnitude of the correlation, asterisks indicate significance of correlation (* indicates q value <0.05 and indicates q value <0.1). b Network visualizing significant gene-microbe correlations (solid edges, q value <0.1) and significant microbe-microbe correlations (dashed edges, SparCC IRI>=0.1 and p value <0.05). Blue edges indicate positive correlation and red edges indicate negative correlation. Edge thickness represents the strength of the correlation. c Scatterplots depicting pattern of grouping by cystic fibrosis (red) and healthy (blue) samples in a few representative gene-microbe correlations, where the strength of correlation (Spearman rho) and significance (q) is indicated at the top of each plot and dashed edges represent microbe-microbe correla- tions. This subnetwork of microbe-microbe correlations depicts correlated abundance changes in the microbiome as a function of their presence (Fig. 3b, dashed edges). For instance, Bilophila and Butyricimonas are both de- pleted in CF (q value <0.05), and the abundance of the two genera is also correlated across individuals (SparCC R-05 pseudo p value=0.04) On the other hand solid edges), microbial nodes have more edges on aver- age compared to genes, where Christensenellaceae and Clostridium formed distinct hubs in the network. This potentially implies that these microbes and their path- ways are shared across multiple GI cancer-associated genes. Of note, Bilophila, Clostridium, and Pseudomonas are mostly negatively correlated with Gl cancer genes, while Haemophilus Oscillasnina Veillonella Eusobacter
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 1 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap…
Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap…
Biology
ISBN:
9781337408332
Author:
Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa Starr
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap…
Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap…
Biology
ISBN:
9781305073951
Author:
Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa Starr
Publisher:
Cengage Learning