Gozilla Inc. can generate 100 (CO2) emissions without any regulation. The marginal control cost for Gozilla Inc., associated with emission reduction, is known MC=20+0.5Q where Q is reduced units. Suppose that the regulator impose an emission standard on Gozilla: According to the emission standard, the factory is allowed to emit 40 units. Gozilla Inc. will clean up regulation is units of pollutant under the emission standard. The total control cost for Gozilla Inc. in this command-and-control Hint: Type integers.

Gozilla Inc. can generate 100 (CO2) emissions without any regulation. The marginal control cost for Gozilla Inc., associated with emission reduction, is known MC=20+0.5Q where Q is reduced units. Suppose that the regulator impose an emission standard on Gozilla: According to the emission standard, the factory is allowed to emit 40 units. Gozilla Inc. will clean up regulation is units of pollutant under the emission standard. The total control cost for Gozilla Inc. in this command-and-control Hint: Type integers.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which of the following policies aimed at reducing sulfur pollution would create an incentive for firms to find new innovative ways to reduce sulfur emissions? (Select all that apply) A requirement that all firms use a scrubber that removes sulfur from the smoke stack Marketable permits for sulfur emissions A sulfur pollution charge A requirement that all firms use a certain type of fuel
Marginal Damages of Pollution: MD = 40 Marginal Abatement Cost: MAC = 100 -2Q e. Calculate and compare the change in welfare for Mr. Peabody's coal plant under the efficient tax and efficient subsidy (i.e. the difference in the plant's welfare under a tax (subsidy) compared to no policy at all).
мса 3 Consider a competitive market in which units of output are produced at a total private cost (TPC) described by the equation TPC = 50 + 200. The production of these units of output also generates a total externality cost (TEC) described by the equation TEC = 302. The marginal private benefits that consumers attach to additional units of output are shown by the (inverse) market demand curve P = 100 - 20. From this information we can deduce that the socially efficient output level is: A Q = 8 В Q = 20 C Q = 25 Q = 10 E I do not want to answer this question. F Q = 80
Example: Question 4a.) Arthur’s demand to reduce electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) is P = 20 – 2 Q, whileRonald’s demand is P = 15 – 3 Q. If the marginal cost of reducing emissions is equal to$15 and is constant, what is the optimal amount of EMF reduction? b.) What Lindahl prices would you charge Arthur and Ronald? What might prevent you fromcollecting these prices?c.) How would your answers change if the marginal cost of reducing emissions was equal to$10 and is constant?d.) What are the consumer surpluses of Arthur and Ronald in c.)?
Firms in a polluting industry can be classified in two groups: newer firms with a cleaner technology that can abate pollution at a lower marginal cost MCLA = (1/2)aL and older firms with dirtier MCHA = aH, where ai is the level of abatement undertaken by firms of type i = L, H. The social marginal benefit of abating pollution from this particular industry is MBA= 120 - A, where A is the aggregate level of abatement in that industry. To design an efficient emissions standard, the government needs to determine which is the efficient abatement allocation (aL, aH). In order to do this, obtain a cost effective abatement allocation (aL, aH)that provides an aggregate abatement level A = aL + aH, and then proceed to determine the efficient level A (Hint: You should obtain that MCA = A=3)
Consider a market with two polluting firms with linear marginal abatement cost curves. Firm B has increasing marginal abatement costs that are everywhere half as high as Firm A’s marginal abatement costs. The maximum amount of pollution that can be tolerated is less than the total these two firms would emit if their pollution was unrestricted. Thus some aggregate amount of abatement is necessary. The pollutant in question is uniformly mixing, so it doesn’t matter which firm cuts back how much, only that between them, they cut back by the required total amount. The environmental agency decides to solve the abatement allocation problem by giving out pollution permits in amounts such that each firm would be obliged to cut back their emissions by an equal amount. Would this be “fair”? Would it be “efficient”?
C Consider two polluting firms with the following marginal savings functions; MS, = 20 - e, for firm 1 MS2 = 40 – 2e, for firm 2 Where e and ez are emission levels for firm 1 and 2, respectively. a. Sketch the MS functions on a diagram. b. Derive the total MS function. Draw it on your diagram above. c. The regulator would like to reduce the level of total emissions by 60% from their unregulated level. What is the total reduction in emissions needed? i. If the regulator decides emissions be cut using equiproportionate reduction, how much is each firm required to reduce? Explain whether this would be a cost-effective way to reduce emissions?
Firms in a polluting industry can be classified in two groups: newer firms with a cleaner technology that can abate pollution at a lower marginal cost MCLA = (1/2)aL and older firms with dirtier MCHA = aH, where ai is the level of abatement undertaken by firms of type i = L, H. The social marginal benefit of abating pollution from this particular industry is MBA= 120 - A, where A is the aggregate level of abatement in that industry. Suppose that in order to avoid the costly obtention of disaggregate information about individual firms' costs, the government just implements a uniform standard aui = A* / 2. Is this allocation efficient? If not, what is the deadweight loss?
The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency investigates how emissions of an environmentally hazardous substance from an industrial sector should be regulated, either through a tax on the emissions or through a quantitative regulation (limit value). As this is a new substance (new substance), knowledge of the level of environmental damage and the costs of reducing emissions is uncertain. In more technical terms: the regulatory authorities do not have complete information on the positions on either the dD / dM curve (marginal damages) or the MAC curve (marginal abatement costs). a) Explain and show graphically whether - and if so how - the uncertainty about the position of the MAC curve affects the choice between regulating emissions with a tax or limit value from a socio-economic efficiency perspective. b) Explain and show graphically whether - and if so how - the uncertainty about the position of the dD / dM curve affects the choice between regulating emissions with a tax or limit…
Suppose that engineers have discovered a new production process for this product which results in a significant positive externality. As a result of the positive externality, for every given output level Marginal Social Value (MSV1) is now higher than consumer’s marginal willingness to pay (also known as the Demand Curve shown as D0 below). Keep in mind that the setting is still that of a monopoly. 1) Please indicate on the graph above, assuming an absence of any government intervention to correct the positive externality and adding any necessary curve(s): The monopoly price P1 and the monopoly quantity Q1 under the condition of the (uncorrected) positive externality. (Also indicate, for comparison purposes, the original monopoly price P0 and monopoly quantity Q0.) The Socially Optimal output, QSO1. The resulting Consumer Surplus CS1, the resulting Producer Surplus PS1, and the size of Dead-Weight Loss DWL1 if there is such a loss. (No need to show the economic profits earned by the…
Lecture: Externality - Pigou8. All-Leather is a tanning company located on Lake Michigan in Chicago. Its total cost functionis C(QA) = 125 + 8QA + 5QA2, where QA is leather production per week in thousands of pounds.a) If leather sells for $408 per thousand pounds, how much leather will All-Leather produce?How much profit does All-leather earn?Enjoy is a beverage company located on Lake Michigan near All-Leather in Chicago. Enjoy’sproduction of beverages is negatively affected by water pollution from All-Leather’s productionof leather. Enjoy’s total cost function to produce beverages isC(QE) = 10QE +3QE2 + 3QA2where QE is Enjoy’s weekly production of beverages, in thousandsof gallons and, as above, QA is All-Leather’s weekly production of leather.b) Is this an example of a pecuniary externality or a real externality? Explain.c) What is the extra cost to Enjoy from an additional thousand tons of leather production by AllLeather (i.e., the external marginal cost of an extra unit of QA…
State whether the fallowing statements is TRUE or FALSE. Explain your reasoning briefly. a) Noise produced by alcraft around an international airport is excudable and rival.