Suppose MAC functions for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, are MAC₁= 60-2E and MAC₂-48-3E2 respectively. (i) Suggest the (socially) cost-effective way to set emission standards for the two firms to reduce their combined level of emissions to 20 units. [Note that we want only 20 units of emissions from the two firms at the end.] (ii) What is the sum of the abatement costs (or total social compliance costs) when emissions are reduced from the two firms to 20 units in the socially cost-effective manner by using emission standards. [This is related to part (i).] (iii) What emission tax rate applied simulataneously to the two firms reduces the combined level of emissions to 20 units from the two firms just as the cost-effective way to set standards? [This question needs to answered based on your answer(s) to part (ii).]

Suppose MAC functions for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, are MAC₁= 60-2E and MAC₂-48-3E2 respectively. (i) Suggest the (socially) cost-effective way to set emission standards for the two firms to reduce their combined level of emissions to 20 units. [Note that we want only 20 units of emissions from the two firms at the end.] (ii) What is the sum of the abatement costs (or total social compliance costs) when emissions are reduced from the two firms to 20 units in the socially cost-effective manner by using emission standards. [This is related to part (i).] (iii) What emission tax rate applied simulataneously to the two firms reduces the combined level of emissions to 20 units from the two firms just as the cost-effective way to set standards? [This question needs to answered based on your answer(s) to part (ii).]

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose there are three polluting sources with MAC1 = 100 - 4E, MAC2 = 80 - 2E and MAC3 = 60 - 0.5E. When MAC equals $10, the aggregate level of abatement for these sources would be _______.
2) Suppose the demand curve for a rubber-based product is Q_D=225-0.5P, and the supply curve is Q_S=0.5P-15. If the external cost of the suit from the waste produced by the factory producing the item is MEC-Q, calculate: (a) Competitive price and quantity when there is no control over the waste disposal of the factory. (b) Price and quantity at the socially optimal level.
There are two signatures. The profit function of firm j is: Zj = Zj + AEJ - B/2 * E2J Where all parameters are positive and EJ denotes the emissions of firm j. (i) If there is no regulation, what level of emissions will each firm choose?
Find Pure Strategy Nash equilibirum then use following values for emissions.
Please help me with this question ASAP
Describe the key symmetry between a pollution emissions tax and an emissions trading scheme. Outline some reasons you might wish to choose one approach in favour of the other when dealing with an emissions-reduction problem.
Please don't copy
A river is being used by both a chemical factory for waste disposal and a salmon fishery for fish reproduction. Waste emissions from the factory detrimentally affect fish reproduction at the downstream salmon fishery. The chemical factory's emission levels are currently unregulated. The marginal damage caused to the salmon fishery is given by MD=4e, where e is the level of emissions discharged into the river per month by the chemical factory. To reduce its emissions, the chemical factory would face marginal abatement costs of MAC=800-16e. Suppose that instead of a constant tax of $T per unit of emissions, the government enacts a two- rate tax system, where the higher rate (call it TH) is designed to achieve the efficient level of emissions, and the lower rate (call it T1) is designed to collect just enough tax revenues to cover the damages from remaining emissions. 23. At what amount per unit should the government set for the higher rate? $ 24. At what amount per unit should the…
(Q4) Explain carefully why a chemical plant polluting the atmosphere might generate a negative production externality. Suppose the chemical firm's cost function C is defined as Ce(C,X), where c is chemicals produced and x is air pollution from chemical production. Define what is meant by the marginal costs of producing chemicals and the marginal costs of abating air pollution. Assume the marginal costs of chemical production increase with chemical output, and marginal abatement costs decline with air pollution, and the chemical firm sells in a competitive market. Use the appropriate diagram to show where the chemical firm will maximize its profits. Explain why if the firm cuts back its output, its profit decreases and its abatement costs increase.
Suppose the marginal benefit (MB) and marginal cost (MC) curves for emitting particulate matter are given by the following schedules, where E is the quantity of emissions per period. The marginal benefits and costs are measured at the quantities of emissions shown. E/Period MB ($ MC ($) 0 230 0 200 190 10 400 150 30 600 110 50 800 70 70 1000 30 90 Use the information above to calculate the tax rate that would achieve the efficient rate of emissions. Efficient Tax Rate =$__ per unit of pollution
Suppose that a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is MAC = 12 - E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, then its marginal abatement cost function will become MAC = 6 - 0.5E. With an emissions tax of $4, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal $____. Please round your final answer to two decimal places if necessary. THE ANSWER IS NOT 16 Maybe 4?
A utility company is closely monitoring a new set of federal guidelines recently passed by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) regarding allowable green house (CO2) emission levels. In this example, the primary external factor of concern for the utility company in question. environment is the A Technological Regulatory (also political and legal) C Competitive D Economic