Consider a Stackelberg game of quantity competition between two firms. Firm 1 is the leader and firm 2 is the follower. Market demand is described by the inverse demand function P=1000-4Q. Each firm has a constant unit cost of production equal to 20. Suppose firm 2's unit cost of production is c<20. What value would c have so that in the Nash Equilibrium, the two firms, the leader and the follower, had the same market share?

Consider a Stackelberg game of quantity competition between two firms. Firm 1 is the leader and firm 2 is the follower. Market demand is described by the inverse demand function P=1000-4Q. Each firm has a constant unit cost of production equal to 20. Suppose firm 2's unit cost of production is c<20. What value would c have so that in the Nash Equilibrium, the two firms, the leader and the follower, had the same market share?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose two firms A and B compete against each other in a Cournot fashion by choosing their quantities. What is the Nash Equilibrium of the game if both firms have a constant marginal cost of 2 and the price in the market is: p(qa + qB) = 20 – 2(qA + qB). O (3, 3) O (2, 2) O (4, 4) None of the other answers are correct (5, 5)
Prove that in a strict Nash equilibrium, the equilibrium strategy of a player in a finite strategic game cannot be weakly dominated.
We can see from the payoff matrix that there are no pure strategy Nash equilibrium in this game because at least one firm would always have an incentive to change its behavior. From Nash's theorem, we know there must be at least one Nash equilibrium so there must be a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. Find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium by first deleting all dominated strategies in the game What's the expected payoff to Firm 2 in the equilibrium?
Imagine a small town with three car repair shops competing for a limited number of customers. Explain why the three shops working together to keep their prices high is unlikely to be a Nash equilibrium.
Consider a Cournot duopoly. The inverse demand function of the market is given by p = 10-Q, where p is the market price, and Q = 91 +92 is the aggregate output. The marginal costs of the two firms are C₁ 1 and C₂ = 4. = (a) Solve for the Nash equilibrium of the game including firm out- puts, market price, aggregate output, and firm profits. (b) Now suppose these two firms play a 2-stage game. In stage 1, they produce capacities 9₁ and 92, which are equal to the Nash equilibrium quantities of the Cournot game characterised by part (a). In stage 2, they simultaneously decide on their prices p₁ and P2. The marginal cost for each firm to sell up to capacity is 0. It is impossible to sell more than capacity. The residual demand for 10 Piāj if Pi > Pj firm ij, is Di (Pi, Pj) = 10-Pi 2 = if pipi. (Note, if Pi < Pj 10 - Pi here we assume that the efficient/parallel rationing applies). Prove that it is a Nash equilibrium of the second stage subgame that each firm charges the market clearing…
O Cell A O Cell C O Cell E O Cell I None of the above
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
Answer to the image?
Consider the following game: PLAYER 2 Left Middle Right Up 0,0 2,5 5.4 PLAYER 1 Middle 1,2 7,3 4,3 Down 5,5 3, 1 2, 1 Which of the following statements is true? There are two Nash equilibria, and they are both Pareto efficient. There is a unique Nash equilibrium. There are two Nash equilibria, and they are both Pareto inefficient. There are two Nash equilibria, but only one is Pareto efficient. None of these.
While game theory predicts non-cooperative behavior for a one-shot Prisoner's dilemma. By repeating the game, say 20 rounds, it becomes possible to adopt more complex strategies that allow cooperative play as a Nash Equilibrium in at least some rounds of the game. True False
Which of the following best describes Nash equilibrium? a) A situation where one player dominates the others b) A situation where each player's strategy is optimal given the strategies of the others c) A situation where all players cooperate perfectly d) A situation where players change strategies constantly
Consider a market in which there are two firms: A and B. Each firm produces a differentiated product and chooses its price. Assume that each firm can set price equal to $60 or $70. The payoffs associated with each set of prices are shown. If the firms choose price simultaneously, then the Nash equilibrium price for firm A is chooses price first and can commit to that price, then firm A will set its price equal to If firm A ○ A. $70; $60 B. $70; $70 ○ C. $60; $70 ○ D. $60; $60 Q Firm B's Price ✓ $60 $70 $1800 $1650 $60 $1800 $2250 Firm A's Price $2250 $2200 $70 $1650 $2200