Mack Precision Tool and Die has two production departments, Fabricating and Finishing, and two service departments, Repair and Quality Control. Direct costs for each department and the proportion of service costs used by the various departments for the month of March follow: Department Fabricating Finishing Repair Quality Control Job MP-47: Machine-hours Labor-hours Direct Costs $ 133,600 96,200 41,100 76,700 Job MP-48: Machine-hours Labor-hours Repair Fabricating 37 87 Exercise 11-26 (Algo) Allocating Service Department Costs First to Production Departments and Then to Jobs (LO 11-1) 30 90 Assume that both Fabricating and Finishing work on just two jobs during the month of March: MP-47 and MP-48. Costs are allocated to jobs based on labor-hours in Fabricating and machine-hours in Finishing. The number of labor-hours and machine-hours worked in each department are as follows: 0.8 Finishing 80 10 Proportion of Services Used by Quality Control 62 32 0.2 0 Fabricating Finishing 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 Required: How much of the service department costs allocated to Fabricating and Finishing using the direct method should be allocated to Job MP-47? How much should be allocated to Job MP-48? Assume that both Fabricating and Finishing work on just two jobs during the month of March: MP-47 and MP-48. Costs are allocated to jobs based on labor-hours in Fabricating and machine-hours in Finishing. The number of labor-hours and machine-hours worked in each department are as follows: Job MP-47: Machine-hours Labor-hours Job MP-48: Machine-hours Labor-hours Fabricating Finishing Fabricating 37 87 Job MP-47 30 90 Required: How much of the service department costs allocated to Fabricating and Finishing using the direct method should be allocated to Job MP-47? How much should be allocated to Job MP-48? Note: Round "Department rate" to 2 decimal places. Do not round other intermediate calculations. Round final answers to the nearest whole dollar. Finishing 80 10 Job MP-48 62 32

not use ai please

Domestic

Clonex Labs, Incorporated, uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The following data are available for one department for October: Work in process, October 1 Work in process, October 31 Units 49,000 29,000 Equivalent units of production Percent Completed Materials 85% 70% The department started 391,000 units into production during the month and transferred 411,000 completed units to the next department. Required: Compute the equivalent units of production for October. Materials Conversion 55% 49% Conversion

Mercier Manufacturing produces a plastic part in three sequential departments: Extruding, Fabricating, and Packaging. Mercier uses the weighted-average process costing method to account for costs of production in all three departments. The following information was obtained for the Fabricating Department for the month of September. Work in process on September 1 had 15,000 units made up of the following:   Amount Degree of Completion Prior department costs transferred in from the Extruding Department $ 80,250 100% Costs added by the Fabricating Department     Direct materials $ 40,500 90% Direct labor 10,200 70% Manufacturing overhead 9,420 35%   $ 60,120   Work in process, September 1 $ 140,370   During September, 75,000 units were transferred in from the Extruding Department at a cost of $446,250. The Fabricating Department added the following costs: Direct materials $ 214,200 Direct labor 64,800 Manufacturing overhead 34,380 Total costs added $ 313,380…

Foley Manufacturing uses a process costing system. The following for one department in April: Units 15,000 40,000 Percent Completed Materials 65% 70% Work in Process April 1 Work in Process April 30 The department started 145,000 units during the month. Conversion 45% 50% Required: 1. Determine the physical flow of products. Show reconciliation below. 2. Compute the equivalent units of production for April assuming the company used the weighted-average method of accounting for units and costs.

A-2

Betty DeRose, Inc. operates two departments, the handling department and the packaging department. During April, the handling department reported the following information: work in process, April 1 units started during April work in process, April 30 units 27,000 59,000 34,000 work in process, April 1 costs added during April total costs % complete DM 60% DM $ 25,310 $190,720 $216,030 70% The cost of beginning work in process and the costs added during April were as follows: % complete conversion 85% Conversion $191, 175 $208,985 $400, 160 40% Total cost $216,485 $399, 705 $616, 190 Calculate the equivalent units with respect to conversion costs using the FIFO process costing method.

Date + + + + + I + ī + ||| I General Journal Account/Explanation Page G2 PR Debit Credit