Microeconomics
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259915727
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 5P
Subpart (a):
To determine
The value of gains and losses in utility.
Subpart (b):
To determine
The value of gains and losses in utility.
Subpart (c):
To determine
The value of gains and losses in utility.
Subpart (d):
To determine
The value of gains and losses in utility.
Subpart (e):
To determine
The value of gains and losses in utility.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
By using the expected utility theory approach with u(x)=x2, choose the optimal decision for three different possible outcomes with probabilities
p(ω1)=1/2, p(ω2)=p(ω3)=1/4,
rewards R(d1,ω1)=£49,R(d1,ω2)=R(d1,ω3)=£25,
R(d2,ω1)=£36,R(d2,ω2)=£100,R(d2,ω3)=£0,
R(d3,ω1)=£81,R(d3,ω2)=R(d3,ω3)=£0
In order to increase economic activity, a city proposes to allow diesel-powered delivery vehicles to operate in residential neighborhoods. Diesel exhaust contains soot which is a major cause of asthma and other respiratory ailments leading to a decrease in the quality of life in these communties. A neighborhood group opposed to this proposal hires you to conduct a valuation study to show the decrease in the quality of life. a) What specific valuation method should you use? b) How would you use that method? c) What are some problems that might result from your use of that method?
Holdup: Consider an ultimatum game (T = 1 bargaining game) in which
before player 1 makes his offer to player 2, player 2 can invest in the size of the
pie. If player 2 chooses a low level of investment (L) then the size of the pie is
small, equal to vL, while if player 2 chooses a high level of investment (H) then
the size of the pie is large, equal to VH. The cost to player 2 of choosing L is c1,
while the cost of choosing H is CH. Assume that ví > V1 > 0, cH > CL > 0,
and vH - CH > vL = CL·
What is the unique subgame-perfect equilibrium of this game? Is it
Pareto optimal?
b. Can you find a Nash equilibrium of the game that results in an outcome
that is better for both players as compared to the unique subgame-
perfect equilibrium?
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Cost-Benefit Analysis Suppose you can take one of two summer jobs. In the first job as a flight attendant, with a salary of $5,000, you estimate the probability you will die is 1 in 40,000. Alternatively, you could drive a truck transporting hazardous materials, which pays $12,000 and for which the probability of death is 1 in 10,000. Suppose that you're indifferent between the two jobs except for the pay and the chance of death. If you choose the job as a flight attendant, what does this say about the value you place on your life?arrow_forwardSuppose Jessica has two choices: receive $12000 and 30 utils or take a gamble that has a 55% chance of a $20000 and 45 utils, and a 45% chance of a $0 payoff and zero utility. Assuming Jessica is a utility maximizer, what will she likely choose? a) Jessica will not take the gamble b) Jessica will take the gamble c) It cannot be determined d) Jessica is indifferentarrow_forwardScenario 2 Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function ( sqrt c) . Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. Refer to Scenario 2 Calculate Lex’s and Tess' expected utilities without insurance. (each one separated) Round to two decimal places for botharrow_forward
- Behavioral evidence suggests that the likelihood of both fifirms choosing high prices can be increased if their executives can (A) engage in informal communications and signal their intention to keep high prices; (B) play mixed strategies; (C) use the K-level thinking; (D) none of the above.arrow_forwardCENGAGE MINDTAP News Analysis: Go for the Video Bonus While spending the weekend in New York City, Andrew, Beth, and their son, Darnell, are lucky enough to hail the Cash Cab for their taxi ride. During their ride, they win $100 for correct answers and receive only one strike for a wrong answer, so at the end of the ride they are eligible for the video bonus question. Their vacation budget before entering the cab was $400, and based on their understanding of the type of bonus question they'll be asked, they believe they have a 70% chance of getting the question right. As explained in the article, if they answer the video bonus question correctly, they will double their winnings, but if they miss the video bonus question, they will lose all of what they had previously won. Alternatively, they can choose not to play for the bonus and walk away with their winnings from the cab ride. The following graph shows the cab riders' utility as a function of their total vacation budget. For…arrow_forwardSuppose your classmate Yakov offers you a wager: He will choose a playing card at random from a deck and pay you $1,000 if it is red, but you have to pay him $1,000 if it is black. Assume your wealth is currently $3,000. The graph shown below plots your utility as a function of wealth. Use the graph to answer the questions that follow. UTILITY (Units of utility) 100 90 8 8 70 288 50 40 30 20 10 0 WEALTH (Thousands of dollars)arrow_forward
- Suppose Jimi has reference dependent preferences over guitars and money as in Tversky and Kahneman (1991). His utility functions are given below. Gains Gains 400 2 -2 -2 Guitars 24 Losses Losses -600 -2 What is the least amount of money Jimi is willing to accept to sell one of his guitars? (just enter a dollar amount, i.e., "1000", not "$1000"arrow_forwardConsider two individuals, Dani and Tom. Dani's utility function is given by U(c)=In(c), where c is the amount of consumption in a given period. Tom's utility is U(c)=c^2 a) In two separate graphs, draw Dani and Tom's utility function (U in y-axis, c in x-axis). b) Both Dani and Tom can purchase a lottery that pays 5 with 75% probability, and 15 with 25% probability. Calculate and mark on the graphs the utility evaluated at the expected level of consumption for the lottery. Then calculate and mark on the graphs the expected utility for Dani and Tom. c) How do utilities at the expected level of consumption compare to the expected utility? What explains the difference between Dani and Tom? What implication does this difference have for their risk preferences?arrow_forwardScenario 2 Tess and Lex earn $40,000 per year and all earnings are spent on consumption (c). Tess and Lex both have the utility function (sqrt c) . Both could experience an adverse event that results in earnings of $0 per year. Tess has a 1% chance of experiencing an adverse event and Lex has a 12% chance of experiencing an adverse event. Tess and Lex are both aware of their risk of an adverse event. Refer to Scenario 2 Suppose that insurance companies do not know specific probabilities of adverse events for Tess or Lex, but do know the average probability of an adverse event. If they assumed that both Tess and Lex purchase full insurance, what is the actuarially fair premium charged? Round to two decimal placesarrow_forward
- We learned that we can use choice between a gamble over someone's best and worst outcomes and getting an outcome of interest (like getting pizza) for certain as a way to assign numeric values to utility (on a scale of 0 to 1). Using this method, if you are indifferent between the following: A gamble that has a 0.3 chance of your best possible outcome (and no lower chance), and a 0.7 chance of your worst possible outcome. Getting pizza for certain. it means that your utility for getting pizza is:arrow_forwardProblem 2: Brian wants to use his recent knowledge of utility to develop his own utility function for how many hours he should study for future tests. He mainly cares about two attributes: the number of hours he studies (x), and the mark (out of 100) that he gets (y). His research of utility functions shows that when a decision maker has to decide based on more than one attribute, a multi-linear multi-attribute utility function can be developed. This function follows the form U(x, y) = kxUx(x) + kyUy(y) + (1 − kx-ky)Ux(x)Uy(y), where Ux(x) and Uy(y), are independent utility functions for attribute x and attribute y, and kx and ky are constants. If Brian just considers the number of hours he studies, he believes his utility function for the number of hours he studies is: Ux(x) : = 1 x² - where 0 ≤ x ≤ 4. If Brian just considers the 16 = mark he gets, his utility function is: Uy(y) : ) y , where 0 ≤ y ≤ 100. Brian is indifferent J 100 between (i) studying 0 hours and getting a mark of 49…arrow_forwardVictoria founded a start-up several years ago, together with her Macedonian friends. At first, she was fairly poor and therefore very afraid of taking risks. Any negative shock could send the company into bankruptcy. Nowadays her business is thriving, stretching across several markets from Europe to Asia. Victoria no longer worries about taking monetary risks. In fact she enjoys a good gamble over horse races from time to time. How would you draw Victoria's utility function in a way that describes her changing taste for risk as her wealth increased? Please draw a graph and comment. Please do fast ASAP fastarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education