Microeconomics
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259915727
Author: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean Masaki Flynn Dr.
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 8, Problem 13DQ
To determine
Ethics of using the nudges.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
1. Alizeh and Kelly were traveling together and have gotten stranded at an airport overnight.
They have no cash, but they did both think to bring granola bars and turkey sandwiches with
them. They currently each have several granola bars and a few sandwiches. Alizeh announces
that she'd be willing to give up a granola bar for one turkey sandwich. Kelly responds that
turkey sandwiches are bigger than granola bars so she would be willing to give up a granola
bar if she could get half a turkey sandwich. Is Kelly and Alizeh's current allocation of granola
bars and turkey sandwiches efficient? Explain why or why not. (Note that you cannot rely
on a rule here – you have to specifically explain why the allocation does or does not meet the
definition of an efficient allocation.)
4. Suppose that there is a negotiation between two players over a painting. Person 1, the
seller, has no interest in the painting. On the other hand the painting is worth $100 to the
buyer. If the painting is sold at a price in between 0 and 100, both are better off. Player 1
proposes a price p to player 2. Then, after observing player 1's offer, player 2 decides
whether to accept it or to reject it. If the offer is rejected both get zero and the game ends.
Find the unique SPNE of this game.
Suppose it is a well-known fact that among ten-year old Ford F-150s, half the trucks are good and half of them are lemons. Suppose that it is also known to all parties that a good truck is worth $8,000 to current owners and $10,000 to potential buyers. A bad truck, on the other hand, is only worth $1,000 to current owners and $2,000 to potential buyers.
Throughout, assume that buyers are risk-neutral.
4) Suppose that after much haggling, the current owner is willing to let her truck go for $6,000. What is the most likely implication?
a) The truck is a lemon.
b) The buyer is an excellent negotiator.
c) It's a mutually beneficial transaction.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- How do I work this word problem? Ace Alexia plays professional tennis for a living, but in spite of her big first serve, she is not very successful. During the last year, Ace could have earned $75,000 as a tennis instructor at the Atlanta Tennis Club. She would have spent $7,000 on meals, paid rent on a condo in Atlanta at $800 per month, and made car payments of $300 per month. Instead, she remained a pro and won $100,000 in prize money in various tournaments around the county. In doing so, she spent $12,000 on transportation and lodging and paid her coach/trainer $10,000 for the year. She also spent $7,000 on meals, paid rent on her condo in Atlanta at $800 per month, and made the payments on her car at $300 a month. Ace's opportunity cost of playing tennis last year was?arrow_forward10. Player A and Player B are playing a game . First , Player A chooses to either " Keep " or " Pass " . Second , Player B observes A's choice and Player B then chooses to either Keep or Pass . This process continues which creates the sequential game below . Please mark decisions that rational and selfish players will choose at every decision node ( 3 decisions by player A and 3 decisions by player B ) - mark them on the Figure . What is the equilibrium of this game ?arrow_forwardSuppose you have $35,000 in wealth. You have the opportunity to play a game called "Big Bet/Small Bet." In this game, you first choose whether you would like to make a big bet of $15,000 of a small bet of $5,000. You then roll a fair die. If you roll a 4, 5, or 6, you win the game and earn $15,000 for the big bet or $5,000 for the small bet. If you roll a 1, 2, or 3, you lose and lose $15,000 for the big bet and $5,000 for the small bet the game Utility U₂ U₁ BEL 0 11 LATE EE ARTE Are the Small Bet and Big Bet considered fair bets? O Big Bet is fair, but Small Bet is not. No, both are not fair. Yes, both are fair. 20 OSmall Bet is fair, but Big Bet is not. G HA 1 35 D E 1 1 1 1 1 F 1 U 50 Income (thousands of dollars)arrow_forward
- Suppose that there are three beachfront parcels of land available for sale in Astoria, and six people who would each like to purchase one parcel. Assume that the parcels are essentially identical and that the selling price of each is $745,000. The following table states each person's willingness and ability to purchase a parcel. Willingness and Ability to Purchase (Dollars) Alyssa 720,000 Brian 690,000 Crystal 680,000 Nick 900,000 Rosa 810,000 Tim 770,000 Which of these people will buy one of the three beachfront parcels? Check all that apply. Alyssa Brian Crystal Nick Rosa Tim Assume that the three beachfront parcels are sold to the people you indicated in the previous section. Suppose that a few days after the last of those beachfront parcels is sold, another essentially identical beachfront parcel becomes available for sale at a price of $732,500. This fourth parcel _____________be sold…arrow_forwardExercise 5. There are observed following behavioral equations in the economy: C = Co + c(Y-T) 1 = 1o - WR G = Go T = To where: Co > 0, lo > 0, Go > 0, To > 0, ce (0; 1), w > 0. Solve following problems: a) Find IS Curve b) Present graphically how change in government spending affects economy c) Present graphically how change in autonomous tax affects economy d) There is budget deficit in the economy. Government is able to reduce deficit either by increasing taxes or by reducing government spending. Explain, which instrument should be used to reduce budget deficit? e) Government is able to change either taxes or government spending. Which instrument should be used if government tends to increase aggregate income?arrow_forward4. Consider the following variant of the Prisoner's Dilemma game: Player 1 is unsure whether Player 2 is "nice" or "selfish", while Player 2 knows Player 1's preferences. Further suppose that Player 1's preferences depend on whether Player 2 is nice or selfish. Specifically, suppose that there is a probability p that Player 2 is "selfish", in which case the game is given as follows. Game with Selfish Player 2 Player1/Player 2 Cooperate (C) Don't Cooperate (D) Cooperate (C) 4, 4 0, 6 Don't Cooperate (D) 6, 0 2, 2 And Player 2 is "nice" with probability 1-p, in which case the following game results. Game with Nice Player 2 Player1/Player 2 Cooperate (C) Don't Cooperate (D) 2, 4 Cooperate (C) 6, 6 Don't Cooperate (D) 4, 0 0, 2 [Note that C = cooperate (with each other) and D = don't cooperate or defect). a) Write the extensive form of this game. How many strategies does each player have in this game? b) For what values of p (if any) is it a Bayes-Nash equilibrium for Player 1 to play D in…arrow_forward
- 10) GE Fridges Some GE refrigerators have ice and water dispensers that won't dispense ice or water unless your filter authenticates as an official component produced by GE. Suppose one popular model costs $800 to produce, and each filter costs just $10 to produce. Suppose further that GE has categorized their consumers into two groups: low-volume users, who buy two filters per year and value the water and ice dispensing fridge at $1000, and high-volume users, who buy six filters per year and value the water and ice dispensing fridge at $1200. GE is considering two pricing strategies: ● Pricing strategy 1: $980 for refrigerator & $10 for filters Pricing strategy 2: $940 for refrigerator & $25 for filters a) Which pricing strategy would GE prefer? b) Based on the information in the question, I want you to come up with a better pricing strategy than what's been proposed. Specifically, what's the optimal price for the refrigerator and the optimal price for filters that will maximize…arrow_forwardAna and Ivan each individually and simultaneously decide whether to spend the evening at a play or a concert. Ana prefers to attend the concert twice as much without Ivan than to attend the play without him, and she prefers this three times more than being in the same place with Ivan (and at that point, she doesn't care where they are). Ivan prefers being in the same place with Ana twice as much as being at the play without her, and he prefers this four times more than being without Ana at the concert. Both have von Neumann-Morgenstern (vNM) preferences. With what probability will Ivan choose to attend the concert in Nashe's equilibrium?arrow_forwardAssume that you are in the business of providing medical insurance. You have analyzed the market carefully, and you know that at a price of $6,000 per year, you will sell 40,000 insurance policies per year. In addition, you know that at any price above $6,000, no one will buy your insurance policies because the government provides equal-quality policies to anyone who wants one at $6,000. You also know that for every $1,000 you lower your price, you will be able to sell an additional 10,000 policies. For example, at a price of $5,000, you can sell 50,000 policies; at a price of $4,000, you can sell 60,000 policies; and so on. a. Sketch the demand curve that your firm faces. b. Sketch the effective marginal revenue curve that your firm faces. c. If the marginal cost of providing a health insurance policy is $5,000, how many will you sell and what price will you charge? What if MC = +4,500arrow_forward
- Imagine that you are at dinner with an acquaintance and that you are each independently choosing what to order for dinner: a burger (which costs $8), or a chicken ($12). In terms of enjoyment, you each have the same preferences: you value the burger at $14, chicken at $17. In other words, if you were dining alone and ordered a burger, your payoff would equal $14- $8 = $6. In this case, however, you will split the bill equally with your companion and thus your payoff depends both on your own order and the order of your acquaintance. Specifically, each diner's payoff is equal to the value of their own meal minus half the cost of the total bill. They also get a payoff of $2 when both of them choose the same meal. (a) Write down the normal form representation of the game in which both players are independently choosing between the actions Burger, Chicken. (b) What are pure and mixed Nash equilibria? Draw best response graphs according to beliefs.arrow_forward“How to allocate limited resources to their best use is the very first and fundamental principle that you guys learn in a first course in both economics and finance.” Explain how the concepts and techniques covered in the various topics in this course can help address the issue. [Hint: Think about how NPV, as an investment decision rule, addresses the efficient allocation of limited resources problem. Specifically, why an investment project being “profit-making” may still be value- destroying and result in misallocation of resources?]arrow_forwardSuppose that Ciana is deciding whether or not to buy a pair of sneakers that she has been researching online, and also the best place to make her purchase. Three different stores in the area sell the sneakers she likes, but some stores are more convenient for Ciana to reach than others. One option is her local shoe store located only 15 minutes away from where she works, where they charge a marked-up price of $124 for the sneakers: Store Travel Time Each Way Price of a Sneakers (Minutes) (Dollars per sneakers) Local Shoe Store 15 124 Different Neighborhood in Town 30 103 Rural Outlet 60 70 Ciana earns an hourly wage of $30 at her job. In order to purchase her sneakers she will have to take time off work, so each hour away from her job costs her $30 in lost income. Assume that Ciana’s travel time is the same each way (to and from the store) and that it will take her 30 minutes once she reaches a store to complete her shopping. Assume throughout the question…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education