Loose Leaf For Integrated Principles Of Zoology
18th Edition
ISBN: 9781260411140
Author: Cleveland P Hickman Jr. Emeritus, Susan L. Keen, David J Eisenhour Professor PhD, Allan Larson, Helen I'Anson Associate Professor of Biology
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Videos
Textbook Question
Chapter 6, Problem 1RQ
Briefly summarize Lamarck’s concept of the evolutionary process. What is wrong with this concept?
Expert Solution
Summary Introduction
To summarize: The Lamarck’s cancept of process of evolution.
Introduction: Evolution refers to a process of changes that occur in the heritable characters of living organisms over a period of time, from generation to generation. The genetic variation occurs due to mutations, genetic drift, natural selection, and gene flow.
Explanation of Solution
The Lamarcks concept of evolutionary process states that the physical charecteristics acquired by a parent during their lifetime get transferred to their offspring.
Expert Solution
Summary Introduction
To explain: The wrong with the Lamarck’s cancept of process of evolution.
Explanation of Solution
The Lamarcks concept of evolutionary process states that the physical charecteristics acquired by a parent during their lifetime get transferred to their offspring. But, the physical charecteristics do not get transferred to their offspring; only genetical changes in reproductive cells only get transferred.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Lamarck proposed that evolution occurs through the following basic steps:
Organisms are born with certain traits.
Over the course of an organism's life, these traits gradually change due to pressures in the environment.
The changes that occurred during an organism's life are passed on to its young.
This idea is similar to current understandings of how evolution works, but it is not quite correct. Which of the following situations is a counterexample that disproves Lamarck's proposed pattern of how evolution occurs?
A. Even though the ability to fly would be useful to snakes, snakes cannot spontaneously grow wings.
B. Dolphins and whales have become hairless because the fast movement of the water removes all the hair.
C. A person who is a championship bodybuilder does not have children who are naturally muscular at birth.
Discuss Lamarck’s Theory of Evolution.
Name the theory of evolution given by lamarck.
Chapter 6 Solutions
Loose Leaf For Integrated Principles Of Zoology
Ch. 6 - Briefly summarize Lamarcks concept of the...Ch. 6 - What is uniformitarianism? How did it influence...Ch. 6 - Why was the Beagles journey so important to...Ch. 6 - What was the key idea contained in Malthuss essay...Ch. 6 - Explain how each of the following contribute(s) to...Ch. 6 - How do modern evolutionists view the relationship...Ch. 6 - What are the important differences between the...Ch. 6 - What are reproductive barriers? How do premating...Ch. 6 - Under what conditions is sympatric speciation...Ch. 6 - What is the main evolutionary lesson provided by...
Ch. 6 - How is the observation of sporting mutations in...Ch. 6 - What does the theory of punctuated equilibrium...Ch. 6 - Describe the observations and inferences that...Ch. 6 - Identify the random and nonrandom components of...Ch. 6 - Describe some recurring criticisms of Darwins...Ch. 6 - Using the data shown in Figure 6.32, calculate the...Ch. 6 - Assume that you are sampling a trait in animal...Ch. 6 - If after studying a population for a trait...Ch. 6 - Explain why genetic drift is more powerful in...Ch. 6 - Describe how the effects of genetic drift and...Ch. 6 - Is it easier for selection to remove a deleterious...Ch. 6 - Distinguish between microevolution and...Ch. 6 - Explain why the evidence supporting Darwins theory...
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- In lecture we discussed eight (8) lines of evidence that Darwin used to lay out his argument for the fact of evolution in his book On the Origin of Species (1859). Using your materials from lecture and the last chapter of the "Origin" that we read for section, 1) rank order these lines of evidence based on what you find the most to the least compelling. 2) Be sure to describe each of these lines of evidence and 3) discuss how they are, or not, relevant in the early 21st century. (From old pset1) Evidence Variation in domesticated species and breeding (artificial selection) Hierarchical classification (groups nested within groups) "Unity of type" - modification of the same basic structure (homology) Evident "fit" of organisms to environments (but imperfections) (adaptation) Structures without apparent function (vestigial structures) Similarity of organisms in early phases of development (embryology) Order in diversity through time in the fossil record (paleontology) Order in…arrow_forwardFind two examples in the media (internet, TV, etc.) of someone (organization, etc.) erroneously portraying Darwinian evolution using a Lamarckian approach. For both, provide the following: Its origin How are they misrepresenting Darwinian evolution? How do you know they're talking about Lamarckian evolution, not Darwinian?arrow_forwardThe theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forward
- The theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardThe theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardThe theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forward
- The theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardThe theory of evolution by Darwin is a composite theory, i.e. it has five component theories: 1. Evolution as such is the simple proposition that the characteristics of lineages of organisms change over time 2. Common descent is a radically different view of evolution than the scheme Lamarck proposed. Common descent is a concept in evolutionary biology applicable when one species is the ancestor of two or more species later in time. 3. Gradualism – Darwin’s proposition that the differences between even radically different organisms have evolved incrementally, by small steps through intermediate forms. The alternative to this theory, as discussed in later sections, is saltation with great reference to large differences that are believed to have evolved by leaps without intermediates. 4. Populational change – Darwin’s thesis that evolution occurs by changes in the proportions of individuals within a population that have different inherited characteristics. 5. Natural selection – Darwin’s…arrow_forwardLocate two instances of Darwinian evolution being misrepresented by a Lamarckian approach in the media (print, electronic, etc.). Give the following information for both.Its beginnings?arrow_forward
- Discuss the validity of the statement “Evolution is an equal opportunity biological phenomenon”. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples that support or refute this statement.arrow_forwardCompare and contrast Lamarck’s scientifically invalid model of evolution (Lamarckian Inheritance) with Darwin’s scientifically valid model of evolution by Natural Selection. Though incorrect, why was Lamarck’s theory of mutability so revolutionary compared to other scientific thinkers of the time and preceding him? Why was Darwin’s (and technically Alfred Wallace’s) theories of mutability so revolutionary compared to Lamarck’s? What aspects of natural selection did Lamarck get right? What aspects did Lamarck get totally wrong? Remember to consider and give examples of mechanisms of inheritance on both the individual and populational level in Lamarck’s and Darwin’s evolutionary models, as well as the role environmental pressures playarrow_forwardDarwin was not the first to propose a mechanism for evolution. Lamarck proposed “acquired inheritance” in which individuals inherit those traits acquired in the lifetime of their parents (e.g., long necks). Compare Lamark’s mechanism to Darwin’s mechanism for evolution (descent with modification). As part of your answer describe how each theory is similar to the other and how each is different? Finally, Lamarck’s theory can be easily shown to be unworkable (e.g., amputees don’t have babies that are amputees meaning babies don’t inherit the acquired trait). What makes Darwin’s theory workable when compared to Lamarck’s unworkable theory.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)BiologyISBN:9780134580999Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. HoehnPublisher:PEARSON
Biology 2eBiologyISBN:9781947172517Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann ClarkPublisher:OpenStax
Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781259398629Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa StouterPublisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)BiologyISBN:9780815344322Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter WalterPublisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & PhysiologyBiologyISBN:9781260159363Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, CynthiaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)BiologyISBN:9781260231700Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael WindelspechtPublisher:McGraw Hill Education
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:9781947172517
Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:9781259398629
Author:McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9780815344322
Author:Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:9781260159363
Author:Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:9781260231700
Author:Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:McGraw Hill Education
Biology Before Darwin: Crash Course History of Science #19; Author: CrashCourse;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4CKmYSMT_0;License: Standard Youtube License