EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 5.10P
a)
To determine
The size of the flock and the benefit of the shepherd In Nash equilibrium.
b)
To determine
To state:The best response function diagram.
c)
To determine
The new Nash equilibrium flock size and the changes from the original to new.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
(a) Find all allocations that are Pareto efficient in the Prisoners' dilemma game.
Does moving from an allocation where both players defect to an allocation
where one defects and the other cooperate feature a Pareto improvement?
Two neighboring homeowners, i = 1, 2, simultaneously
choose how many hours l, to spend maintaining a beautiful
lawn. The average benefit per hour is
10 – 1, +
2'
and the (opportunity) cost per hour for each is 4. Home-
owner i's average benefit is increasing in the hours neighbor
j spends on his own lawn because the appearance of one's
property depends in part on the beauty of the surrounding
neighborhood.
a. Compute the Nash equilibrium.
b. Graph the best-response functions and indicate the Nash
equilibrium on the graph.
c. On the graph, show how the equilibrium would change
if the intercept of one of the neighbor's average benefit
functions fell from 10 to some smaller number.
There are two firms, whose production activity consumes some of the clean air that surrounds our planet. The total amount of clean air is K > 0, and any consumption of clean air comes out of this common resource. If firm i ∈ {1, 2} uses ki of clean air for its production, the remaining amount of clean air is K − k1 − k2. Each player derives utility from using ki for production and from the remainder of clean air. The payoff of firm i is given by
ui(ki , kj ) = ln(ki) + ln(K − ki − kj ) j ≠ i ∈ {1, 2}.
(a) Assuming that each firm chooses ki ∈ (0, K), to maximize its payoff function, derive the players’ best response functions and find a Nash equilibrium.
(b) Is the equilibrium you found in (a) unique or not? What are equilibrium payoffs?
Chapter 5 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
Ch. 5.3 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.3 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5.4 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.4 - Prob. 2MQCh. 5.4 - Prob. 3MQCh. 5.4 - Prob. 4MQCh. 5.5 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.5 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5.5 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.5 - Prob. 2MQ
Ch. 5.6 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.6 - Prob. 2MQCh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.1TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.2TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.2MQCh. 5.9 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.9 - Prob. 2MQCh. 5.9 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.9 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 6RQCh. 5 - Prob. 7RQCh. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - Prob. 9RQCh. 5 - Prob. 10RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.5PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.6PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.7PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.8PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.9PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Four individuals who live around a large lake are hosting separate New Year’s Eve parties, and all are considering purchasing aerial fireworks; any fireworks purchased will be set off over the lake, and thus will be visible to everyone at all of the parties. Kevin’s marginal benefit from having an additional package of fireworks (which includes the benefit to himself and all of his guests) is given by MBK = 300 – 5Q, Jen’s is given by MBJ = 600 – 10Q, Laura’s is given by MBL = 900 – 15Q, and Emily’s is given by MBE = 1,200 – 20Q, where Q is the total number of packages of fireworks set off at all parties. Each package of fireworks costs $800 (i.e., MC = 800 A)Assuming there are no other relevant costs or benefits, what is the efficient quantity of fireworks? B)How many packages of fireworks will actually be set off if it is left to the free market? (Assume that these individuals each care only about their own benefits [including benefits to their guests] from the fireworks and are…arrow_forwardconsider an exchange economy with 2 goods (1 and 2) and 2 consumer (A and B). a bundle with x units of good 1 and y units of good 2 is written as (x,y). consumer A has an endowment (4,0) and consumer B has an endowment (12,12). the 2 goods are perfect substitutes for each consumer. consider an allocation in which A receives (1,9) and B receives (15,3) if we can redistribute endowments suitably, it is possible to obtain this allocation as the outcome of a competitive equilibrium. is this true or false? explain carefullyarrow_forward(4) Resource Allocation. Consider a combinatorial auction with three items {a,b,c} and three players (I, II, III. The valuations each player has for each subset of a b с ab bс ас abc I 1 2 1 6 4 11 II 3 5 3 3 5 III| 4 5 0 7 5 7 the items is shown below. What is the allocation produced under the VCG (Vickrey-Clarke-Groves) mechanism and what are the VCG payments of the players?arrow_forward
- ASAParrow_forwardTwo roommates John and Joe are playing a simultaneous game of cleaning the apartment. If neither of them clean, the apartment gets filthy and both get a utility of 2. If John cleans and Joe doesn’t, John gets a utility of 1 and Joe gets a utility of 4. If Joe cleans and John doesn’t, Joe gets a utility of 1 and John gets a utility of 4 and if both clean up the apartment, they each get a utility of 3.What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? Group of answer choices Joe cleans, John doesn’t John cleans, Joe doesn’t Both of them clean the apartment Neither of them clean the apartmentarrow_forwardCommon pool resource game) Consider a common pool resource game with two appropriators. (If you don’t know what is a common pool resource, read the Wikipedia article about the ”Tragedy of the Commons”.) Each appropriator has an endowment e > 0 that can be invested in an outside activity with marginal payoff c > 0 or into the common pool resource. Let x ∈ X ⊆ [0, e] denote the player’s investment into the common pool resource (likewise, y denotes the opponent’s investment). The return from investment into the common pool resource is x x+y · ((x + y) − (x + y) 2 ). So the symmetric payoff function is given by π(x, y) = c · (e − x) + x x+y · ((x + y) − (x + y) 2 ) if x > 0 and c · e otherwise. Assume 1 − e < c < 1. Find Nash equilibrium of the game. Proceed by deriving the best response correspondences first. How does Nash equilibrium depend on parameters c and e (varying one at a time and keeping the others fixed)?arrow_forward
- 100 people are choosing between two beaches to go to in the Florida Keys. Beach L is big and never gets crowded, but it is not very nice; the utility from going to Beach L is u(L) = 60. Beach M is much nicer but very small, so it gets crowded; the utility from going to Beach M is u(M) = 100-NM ; NM is the number of people that %3D go to Beach M. 5) The Nash equilibrium number of people that go to Beach L is A) 20 B) 40 C) 60 D) 80 E) 100 5).arrow_forwardSuppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They consume both good X, a private good, and the protection from the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit while one unit of P costs 2 units, so the budget constraint for each is given by: Xi + 2Pi = 100. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form: U = log(Xi) + 2log(Pj + Pd) (a) How much protection, P, will be privately provided? What is optimal consumption of X, the private good? (b) What are the socially optimal amounts of protection, P, and consumption, X, of the private good? How do the socially optimal amounts compare to that privately provided? Explain why.arrow_forwardFor the operating system game, let us assume Windows is more superior than Mac intrinsically and that network effects are stronger for Macs. These modifications are reflected in different payoffs. Now, the payoffs from adopting Windows is 30 + 10 × w and from adopting Mac is 20 × m. n consumers are simultaneously deciding between Windows and Mac, where n > 10. (a) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which everyone buys Windows? Explain your answer. (b) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which everyone buys Mac? Explain your answer. (c) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which some consumers buy Windows and some consumers buy Mac? Explain your answer.arrow_forward
- Two firms are ordered by the Government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MC = 20 + 4Q. Firm B’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MC = 10 + 8Q. The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB = 400 – 4Q. Compare the social efficiency of the three possible outcomes: (1) require both firms to reduce pollution by the same amount;(2) charge a common tax per unit of pollution;(3) require both firms to reduce pollution by the same amount but allow pollution permits to be bought and sold.arrow_forwardAlice and Bob participate in a two-person exchange economy. Alice has the utility function u(x₁, x₂) = x0.8 0.2 and Bob has the utility function u(x₁, x₂) = x¹4x0.6, where ₁ and 2 denote cucumbers and dragon fruits respectively. Alice and Bob are each endowed with 32 cucumbers and 32 dragon fruits. For the remainder of this question, suppose Alice and Bob reached a competitive equilibrium. The number of cucumbers Alice ends up with is The number of dragon fruits Alice ends up with is The number of cucumbers Bob ends up with is The number of dragon fruits Bob ends up with is The price of cucumbers in terms of dragon fruits (if we set dragon fruits to be the numeraire) isarrow_forwardTwo individuals A and B have utility functions defined over two goods, a private good 'x') and a public good, 'F. The utility function of an agent 'i' is defined by ui = 2 log xi + log F where F =FA + FB. Each agent has 200 units of private goods x, as his endowment and 1 unit of private good can be transformed into 1 public good F. Answer the following (a) Find the Nash equilibrium values of FA and FB? (b) What is the Pareto optimal level of F? (c) In what condition the Pareto optimal level of F will not depend on the number of private goods? (d) What would be the consumption of x by each agent if they contribute equally towards the public good (F)? (e) Would it change if an agent had a larger endowment of x to begin with?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
