Microeconomics (Book Only)
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781285738307
Author: Roger A. Arnold
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 9WNG
To determine
Explain who has the
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Consider a hypothetical world with two countries: Country A and Country B. Each country has 45 workers, who produce cars and bicycles. If Country A shifts all its workers to one good, it can produce 1,350 cars or 2,520 bicycles. Under the same conditions, Country B can produce 1,710 cars or 2,880 bicycles. Therefore, Country B has an absolute advantage in producing both goods. Nevertheless, the two countries decide to trade, so each shift production to their areas of comparative advantage.
Determine which good Country A will specialize in. Then, calculate the quantity of this good the country will produce after trade if only 40 workers are involved. If necessary, round any intermediate calculations to two decimal places and your final answer to the nearest whole number.
Two countries, Alpha and Beta consider the construction of a bridge across a river that separates them. The bridge would increase commerce and trade in both countries. If they both contribute to the building of this bridge, then each receive a profit of $32 million. However, if they both fail to contribute, they are each left with a profit of just $30 million. If one country contributes and the other one does not, then the country that does not contribute is a “free rider” and will receive a profit of $35 million. The contributing player spends a lot of money building the bridge and is left with a profit of only $28 million.
5.1. Fill out the payoff matrix (below) for the game by including all the elements (players, their strategies, and their payoffs).
5.2. Assume the players do not cooperate. Solve the game for the Nash equilibrium (find out the strategy played by each player in equilibrium). What is the payoff each gets…
Unsure how to solve
Chapter 2 Solutions
Microeconomics (Book Only)
Ch. 2.1 - Prob. 1STCh. 2.1 - Prob. 2STCh. 2.1 - Prob. 3STCh. 2.1 - Prob. 4STCh. 2 - Prob. 1VQPCh. 2 - Prob. 2VQPCh. 2 - Prob. 3VQPCh. 2 - Prob. 4VQPCh. 2 - Prob. 5VQPCh. 2 - Prob. 1QP
Ch. 2 - Prob. 2QPCh. 2 - Prob. 3QPCh. 2 - Prob. 4QPCh. 2 - Prob. 5QPCh. 2 - Prob. 6QPCh. 2 - Prob. 7QPCh. 2 - Prob. 8QPCh. 2 - Prob. 9QPCh. 2 - Prob. 10QPCh. 2 - Prob. 11QPCh. 2 - Prob. 12QPCh. 2 - Prob. 1WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 2WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 3WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 4WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 5WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 6WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 7WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 8WNGCh. 2 - Prob. 9WNG
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- There are two countries in the world, A and B, which trade only two goods, shirts and pants. Under autarky, shirts are cheaper in Country A than in Country B, whereas the pants are more expensive in Country A. Suppose that the world price of shirts lies above the two countries' autarky prices. BothCountry A and Country B will only produce shirts when the opportunity to trade exists.Answer true, false, or uncertain. Please briefly explain your answerarrow_forwardQ)Suppose that country A using one unit of labor can produce 80 pounds of apples or 20 pounds of oranges, while country B using the same unit of labor can produce 40 pounds of apples or 15 pounds of oranges. This shows that: Group of answer choices If A and B trade, A should specialize in the production of oranges. B has an absolute advantage in the production of apples. B has a comparative advantage in the production of apples. B has a comparative advantage in the production of oranges.arrow_forwardSuppose that there are two countries, the North and the South. Given the North's resources, it can produce 4 Cars in an hour or 1 unit of wheat in an hour. Given the South's resources, it can produce 1 car per hour or 4 units of wheat in an hour. Both countries have forty hours in total to produce wheat and cars. Finally, the goal of each country is to have the most possible cars and wheat, but also to always have an equal amount of each. In other words, 10 cars and 10 wheat is just as valuable as 11 cars and 10 units of wheat, or 10 cars and 11 units of wheat, but 11 cars and 11 wheat would make the country even better off. The question below relates to the PPF for the North and the South. While you do not need to turn in a graph of the PPF, they may be helpful to answer these questions. Finally, the first set of questions refers to a world where the North and South cannot trade, while the second set of questions refers to a world where they can trade. In the latter set of…arrow_forward
- Unsure how to solve properlyarrow_forwardAn examination of the Ricardian model of comparative advantage yields the clear result that trade is (potentially) beneficial for each of the two trading partners since it allows for an expanded consumption choice for each. However, for the world as a whole the expansion of production of one product must involve a decrease in the availability of the other, so that it is not clear that trade is better for the world as a whole as compared to an initial situation of non-trade (but efficient production in each country ?arrow_forwardDuring the last 20 to 30 years, there have been a number of countries whose economies have experienced important economic expansion and development. One group of countries has been labeled the BRIC countries and the other the VISTA countries. Identify each of the nine countries and provide some insights about their economies and economic importance. The theories of absolute and comparative advantage have been offered as an economic rationale for trade between and among regions and countries. Compare and contrast the two concepts. Which of the two do you think is more important for explaining the growth in global trade during the last 25 years? Why”arrow_forward
- The country of "Econoland" can use its resources to produce either 500 tons of crab or 200 tons of plywood. Its rival, "Arcadonia," is able to produce either 200 tons of crab or 100 tons of plywood.From this passage, it can be concluded that Arcadonia should specialize in producing plywood. Econoland has a comparative advantage in plywood. Arcadonia has an absolute advantage in the production of both crab and plywood. Econoland should specialize in producing plywood, and trade them with Arcadonia for crabs.arrow_forwardConsider two outcomes in a pure exchange economy: Outcomes 1 and 2. Outcome 1 is Pareto efficient. Outcome 2 is not Pareto efficient. If outcome 2 (not pareto efficient) moves to outcome 1 (pareto efficient), is it true that moving from outcome 2 ( outcome 2 is not pareto efficient) to outcome 1 (outcome 1 is pareto efficient) is a pareto improvement?arrow_forwardWith its given resources, Nicaragua can produce either 20 thousand pounds of chicken or 80 thousand pounds of quinoa per year. Costa Rica can produce either 100 thousand pounds of chicken or 200 thousand pounds of quinoa per year. Suppose the countries completely specialize and they decide to trade 14 thousand pounds of chicken for 42 thousand pounds of quinoa. After trade, Nicaragua will consume thousand pounds of chicken and thousand pounds of quinoa. After trade, Costa Rica will consume thousand pournds of chicken and thousand pounds of quinoa. Round to the nearest whole number.arrow_forward
- When a country speciallizes in the production of a good, this means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than Its trading partner. Because of this comparative advantage, both countries benefit when they specialize and trade with each other. The following graphs show the production possibilitles frontlers (PPFS) for Maldonia and Sylvanla. Both countries produce lemons and coffee, each Initlally (that is, before specialization and trade) producing 18 million pounds of lemons and 9 million pounds of coffee, as Indicated by grey points (star symbols) labeled point A. Maldonia Sylvania 48 48 42 42 36 36 PPF 30 30 24 24 18 PPF 18 12 12 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 LEMONS (Milions of pounds) LEMONS (Millions of pounds) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the . If each fully specializes (that is, produces only the good for which each has a comparative production of advantage), the most the…arrow_forwardIn Country T, it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13.5 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. In Country Y, it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. Country T has a comparative advantage over Country Y in cocoa. This follows the theory of comparative advantage, and we can say that engaging in free trade benefits all countries that participate in it; however, this conclusion stems from which of these inaccurate assumptions? Multiple Choice We have assumed constant returns to scale. We have assumed the prices of resources and exchange rates in the two countries are dynamic. We have assumed there are barriers to the movement of resources from the production of one good to another within the same country. We have assumed that agrarian nations do not specialize in producing particular products. We have assumed diminishing returns to specialization.arrow_forwardSuppose that a worker in Freedonia can produce either 6 units of corn or 4 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Sylvania can produce either 4 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. For many years the two countries traded, each completely specializing in producing the grain for which it has a comparative advantage. Now, however, war has broken out between them and all trade has stopped. Without trade, Freedonia produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 20 units of wheat per year. Sylvania produces and consumes 20 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. By how much has the combined yearly output of the two countries declined?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co