In Country T, it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13.5 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. In Country Y, it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. Country T has a comparative advantage over Country Y in cocoa. This follows the theory of comparative advantage, and we can say that engaging in free trade benefits all countries that participate in it; however, this conclusion stems from which of these inaccurate assumptions?   Multiple Choice   We have assumed constant returns to scale.   We have assumed the prices of resources and exchange rates in the two countries are dynamic.   We have assumed there are barriers to the movement of resources from the production of one good to another within the same country.   We have assumed that agrarian nations do not specialize in producing particular products.   We have assumed diminishing returns to specialization.

In a PPC graph, if free trade makes the budget line become flatter and the comparative advantage good is on the y - axis, what has free trade done to the country's terms of trade?

If each country specializes in the good in which it has a comparative advantage,....will gain from that trade because

The United States imports televisions from Japan and Japan imports computer chips from the United States. If the theory of comparative advantage guides trade between the two countries, it must be true that Group of answer choices the United States has comparative advantage in producing computer chips. the United States has comparative advantage in producing televisions. the opportunity cost of producing computer chips in the United States is higher than that in Japan. the opportunity cost of producing televisions in Japan is higher than that in the United States.

Starting with the production frontiers for Nation 1 and Nation 2 shown in Figure 5.4, show graphically that even with a small difference in tastes in the two nations, Nation 1 would continue to have a comparative advantage in commodity X.

Explain why Japan exports automobiles, while the U.S. exports aircraft? Use the prior definitions of absolute and comparative advantage to assist with your answer.

Consider a simplified example of two countries - Singapore and Indonesia - producing two goods – telecommunications equipment and electrical circuit apparatus. Using all its resources, Singapore can produce either 50 telecommunications equipment, or 100 electrical circuit apparatus. Using all its resources, Indonesia can produce either 1,000 telecommunications equipment, or 5,000 circuit apparatus. (a) Which country/countries has/have the absolute advantages and the comparative advantages in the production of telecommunications equipment, and of electrical circuit apparatus? Explain and show. (b) Consider the case of constant opportunity cost. What will be the resulting patterns of trade, terms-of-trade, and the aggregate production and consumption? Provide a diagram to illustrate, with telecommunications equipment on the y-axis. (c) It is found that contrary to the above, there is no complete specialisation in both Singapore and Indonesia. Instead, Singapore partially specialises in…

Suppose that each country completely specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage, producing only that good. In this case, the country that produces pistachios will produce. million pounds per day and the country that produces chinos will produce million pairs per day.

Draw a domestic supply and demand diagram for a product in which the United States does not have a comparative advantage. What impact do foreign imports have on domestic price and quantity? On your diagram show a protective tariff that eliminates approximately one-half of the assumed imports. What are the price-quantity effects of this tariff on ( a) domestic consumers, (b) domestic producers, and (c) foreign exporters? How would the effects of a quota that creates the same amount of imports differ?

? illustrate an example of trade induced by comparative advantage. They assume that China and France each have 1,000 production units. With one unit of production (a mix of land, labor, capital, and technology), China can produce either 10 containers of toys or 7 cases of wine. France can produce either 2 cases of toys or 7 cases of wine. Thus, a production unit in China is five times as efficient compared to France when producing toys, but equally efficient when producing wine. Assume at first that no trade takes place. China allocates 800 production units to building toys and 200 production units to producing wine. France allocates 200 production units to building toys and 800 production units to producing wine. Trade at France’s Domestic Price. France’s domestic price is 2 containers of toys equals 7 cases of wine. Assume China produces 10,000 containers of toys and exports 400 containers to France. Assume France in turn produces 7,000 cases of wine and exports 1,400…