Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781337619455
Author: Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 28FF
a.
To determine
Introduction: Corporate governance refers to keeping an oversight over the organizations operations and financial reporting. Corporate governance ensures that operations are in accordance with the objectives of the organizations and meet the stakeholders’ needs.
To explain: The basic principles of corporate governance that appear to have been missing.
b.
To determine
Introduction: Corporate governance refers to keeping an oversight over the organizations operations and financial reporting. Corporate governance ensures that operations are in accordance with the objectives of the organizations and meet the stakeholders’ needs.
To examine: Whether or not external auditors can expect the effectiveness of corporate governance.
c.
To determine
Introduction: Corporate governance refers to keeping an oversight over the organizations operations and financial reporting. Corporate governance ensures that operations are in accordance with the objectives of the organizations and meet the stakeholders’ needs.
To explain: The manner in which external auditors might respond to concerns about the quality of governance.
d.
To determine
Introduction: Corporate governance refers to keeping an oversight over the organizations operations and financial reporting. Corporate governance ensures that operations are in accordance with the objectives of the organizations and meet the stakeholders’ needs.
To explain: Whether or not the company should have an independent chair.
e.
To determine
Introduction: Corporate governance refers to keeping an oversight over the organizations operations and financial reporting. Corporate governance ensures that operations are in accordance with the objectives of the organizations and meet the stakeholders’ needs.
To explain: Whether or not the CEO of the company should be removed.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
In 2010, P Corporation passed a board resolution removing X from his position as general manager of said corporation. The by-laws of P Corporation provides that the officers are the president, general-manager, treasurer and secretary. Upon complaint filed with the SEC, it held that the general manager could be removed by mere resolution of the Board of Directors. On motion for reconsideration, X alleged that he could only be removed by the affirmative vote of the stockholders representing 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock. Is X’s contention tenable?
No, the voting requirement is only majority of the Board of Directors.
No, the vote required is majority of the board and 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock consenting.
Yes, the voting requirements is only 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock.
No, the required vote is majority of the Board of Directors consented by majority of the outstanding capital stock
Mr. Ray, a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) was the auditor of a Registered Public Accounting Firm. He was the lead
auditor for Bay Corporation for 2020. In early 2022 he was hired as the Chief Financial Controller of Bay Company: Mr.
Ray's employment is unethical and is a contravention of the:
a. The Foreign Corrupt Practice Act of 1977.
O b. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX)
The Securities Act of 1933.
O c.
O d. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Mary Ribukh was hired as a staff auditor of LGY and Company in 2005. In December 2012, he transferred to Quilava and Associates. In 2014, he returned back to LGY and Company until his retirement in 2020 at the age of 55. Question 1: Are the retirement benefits taxable to Anton? Question 2: Suppose he was terminated from employment due to dishonesty. Is the separation pay taxable to Anton? Question 3: Suppose he was terminated from employment due to the merger of the two audit firms Will the separation pay be taxable to Anton?
Yes, Yes, Yes
No, Yes No
No Yes, Yes
Yes, No, No
Chapter 2 Solutions
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 2 - The Great Salad Oil Swindle of 1963 is an asset...Ch. 2 - Prob. 2CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 3CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 4CYBKCh. 2 - The three elements of the fraud triangle include...Ch. 2 - Prob. 6CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 7CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 8CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 9CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 10CYBK
Ch. 2 - Prob. 11CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 12CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 13CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 14CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 15CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 16CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 17CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 18CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 19CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 20CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 21CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 22CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 23CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 24CYBKCh. 2 - Prob. 1RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 2RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 3RQSCCh. 2 - Refer to Exhibit 2.1 a. What is a Ponzi scheme? b....Ch. 2 - Prob. 5RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 6RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 7RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 8RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 9RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 10RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 11RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 12RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 13RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 14RQSCCh. 2 - Many consider the Enron fraud to be one of the...Ch. 2 - Prob. 16RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 17RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 18RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 19RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 20RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 21RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 22RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 23RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 24RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 25RQSCCh. 2 - Prob. 26FFCh. 2 - Prob. 27FFCh. 2 - Prob. 28FF
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- ASSIGNMENT TWODazzle Co. is a stock‐market listed company that manufactures personal protection equipment. At a recent board meeting of Dazzle Co., a non‐executive director suggested that the company’s remuneration committee should consider scrapping the company’s current share option scheme, since executive directors could be rewarded by the scheme even when they did not perform well. A second non‐executive director disagreed, saying the problem was that even when directors acted in ways which decreased the agency problem, they might not be rewarded by the share option scheme if the stock market were in decline. Required:(a) Explain the nature of the agency problem in detail. (b) Discuss the use of share option schemes as a way of reducing the agency problem in a stock‐market listed company such as Dazzle Co.arrow_forwardThemba lives in clarendon Jamaica, he is a shareholder of electro Tech Limited. He received notice of an annual general meeting of Electro Tech Limited to be held in Port of Spain, Trinidad. He cannot attend the meeting on that day, but feels strongly about certain of the proposed resolutions set out in the notice of the meeting, and wants to express his views on these matters to the board of directors. Themba also wishes to vote against certain of the resolutions which the company proposed to pass. Advise him how he could exercise his right to vote and to express his views at the annual general meeting of Electro Tech Limited even though he cannot attend the meeting with a law casearrow_forwardW17-2 Shirley Yu, president of SY Corporation, is concerned about several large stockholders who have been very vocal lately in their criticisms of her leadership. She thinks they might mount a campaign to have her removed as the corporation's CEO. She decides that buying them out by purchasing their shares could eliminate them as opponents, and she is confident they would accept a "good" offer. Yu knows the corporation's cash position is decent, so it has the cash to complete the transaction. She also knows the purchase of these shares will increase earnings per share, which should make other investors quite happy. (Earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available for the common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. Therefore, if the number of shares outstanding is decreased by purchasing treasury shares, earnings per share increases.) Instructions: Answer the following questions. (a) Who are the stakeholders in this situation? (b) What…arrow_forward
- Mr. B wanted to become a Board of Director, however 8 years ago he was convicted by final judgment of an offense punishable by imprisonment for a period exceeding six (6) years. He wants to run as Board of Director in the coming elections of the company next week. He comes to you, his well versed in law accountant, for advice. What would be your advice to him? Explain with basis. pls help me, thank youarrow_forwardCaplan Pharma, Inc., recently was sued by a competitor for possible infringement of the competitor’s patent on a top-selling flu vaccine. The plaintiff is suing for damages of $15 million. Caplan's CFO has discussed the case with legal counsel, who believes it is possible that Caplan will not be able to successfully defend the lawsuit. The CFO knows that current U.S. accounting guidelines require that come gencies (such as lawsuits) must be disclosed in the annual report when a loss is possible. However, she is unsure whether this rule must be applied in the preparation of interim financial statements. She also knows that disclosure is necessary only if the amount is material, but she is unsure whether materiality should be assessed in relation to results for the interim period or for the entire year. Required Search current U.S. accounting standards to determine whether contingencies are required to be disclosed in interim reports, and, if so, how materiality is to be determined.…arrow_forwardA group of environmentalists have purchased shares in a mining company. Some 200 members of the group are now shareholders and holding various amounts of shares. The members of the group who have purchased shares are not against profits being made by their company, but are concerned that appropriate health and safety standards are not implemented by the company, and further that appropriate environmental safeguards are implemented when extracting a mineral, transporting it and manufacturing the final product.What rights do members have to question directors at a meeting regarding the company’s environmental practices?What are the rights of members to actually call an extraordinary meeting in order to discuss a particular environmental issue that has arisen since the last meeting of members was held?arrow_forward
- Kwame Lee has been made redundant from a managerial position in an oil company inTrinidad where he had worked for the past fifteen years. His plan is to go into privatepractice as an environmental engineer consultant working in Trinidad and the EasternCaribbean countries.Initially he was unsure whether he should operate as a sole proprietor, incorporate acompany in which he will be the sole director; or operate in partnership with a formerschool friend. However, he was advised that a partnership would be the best structure.Kwame intends to employ staff and invest excess cash from the business in purchasingstocks/shares. The stocks/shares will be purchased by the partnership but will be held intrust for Kwame and his children. Required Kwame Lee has heard the term ‘Appropriation Account’, but he does not understand what itmeans. He asks that you explain the need for an appropriation account and what is includedin this account. He would like you to give practical examples.arrow_forwardRecently, Boho Ltd learned that one of the company's shareholders made statements to the media which caused anger and embarrassment for the New Zealand government. Boho Ltd's board of directors is concerned that the comments will negatively impact the company's chances of winning a million sales dollar with the New Zealand government. Analyse whether Boho Ltd can validly expropriate the shares of this shareholder, and if so, how it should be carried out.arrow_forwardKimball, a partner in a one-office firm, inherits 15 shares of Spotless Housekeeping Services stock. The stock has a market value of $25 per share; there is a ready market for them; and there are 300,000 shares outstanding. Spotless is an audit client of the firm, and Kimball does no work or consulting for Spotless engagements. Which of the following is CORRECT regarding Kimball receiving this stock and maintaining the firm's independence with Spotless? As long as Kimball does not work on the engagements for Spotless, nothing need be done. If he works on the engagements for Spotless, then the shares must be promptly sold to preserve the firm's independence. Since the shares are worth only $375 and they were inherited, nothing need be done. If Kimball transfers the shares to a blind trust where he is the beneficiary, independence with Spotless will not be impaired. The shares must be sold within 30 days of their receipt.arrow_forward
- James Wane was offered to audit BMX Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020. He had served as a Non-executive director of BMX Ltd until 30 June 2017 and his spouse currently owns 10,000 of the 100,000 outstanding shares of BMX. James Must: Select one:a. Discuss with the spouse about this offer. b. Accept the engagement and get the support of his spouse whenever necessary. c. Accept the engagement and remain silent. d. None of the given answers is correct.arrow_forwardMunir has been appointed as a non-executive director director in Syarikat Mualim Sdn Bhd (“the company”). Other Mualim’s directors have now discovered that Robert has previously been an executive director of three public listed companies. Discuss whether there are any grounds on which the Registrar may disqualify Munir from acting as a non-executive director.arrow_forwardAOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit in California, alleging violations of federal law and California state law. The member agreement between AOL and its members included a provision declaring Virginia as the location of any court dispute. AOL asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of that "forum-selection" clause in its member agreement. Under a previous decision of the United States Supreme Court, a forum-selection clause is unenforceable "if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought." California courts previously have declared in other cases that clauses similar to the AOL clause contravene a strong public policy. If the court applies the doctrine of stare decisis, will it dismiss the suit? Explain. [Doe 1 v. AOL LLC, 552 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2009)] (See The Common Law Tradition.)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:Cengage- Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage