Principles of Instrumental Analysis
7th Edition
ISBN: 9781305577213
Author: Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 19, Problem 19.9QAP
Interpretation Introduction
(a)
Interpretation:
The frequency difference at 4.69 T should be predicted.
Concept introduction:
Nuclear magnetic resonance is a technique that is used to predict the structural formula of the compound. NMR spectroscopy involves the examination of the nucleus under the external magnetic field.
Interpretation Introduction
(b)
Interpretation:
The frequency difference at 7.05 T should be predicted.
Concept introduction:
Nuclear magnetic resonance is a technique that is used to predict the structural formula of the compound. NMR spectroscopy involves the examination of the nucleus under the external magnetic field.
Interpretation Introduction
(c)
Interpretation:
The frequency difference at 18.8 T should be predicted. v
Concept introduction:
Nuclear magnetic resonance is a technique that is used to predict the structural formula of the compound. NMR spectroscopy involves the examination of the nucleus under the external magnetic field.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
What frequency (in MHz) is required to cause a proton to flip its spin when it is exposed to a magnetic field of 1 T?
We calculated that the resonance frequency of an 1H in the presence of an 11.74 tesla magnet was 500MHz, and we later saw that a 13C nucleus resonantes at approximately 125 MHz in this same magnetic field. What is the resonance frequency of a 19F nucleus in the presence of an 11.74 tesla magnet?
The chemical shift of the CH3 protons in ethoxyethane (diethyl ether) is δ = 1.16 and that of the CH2 protons is 3.36. What is the difference in local magnetic field between the two regions of the molecule when the applied field is (i) 1.9 T, (ii) 16.5 T?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.1QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.2QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.3QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.4QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.5QAPCh. 19 - A nucleus has a spin quantum number of 7/2. How...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.7QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.8QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.9QAPCh. 19 - Why is 133C-133C spin-spin splitting not observed...
Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.11QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.12QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.13QAPCh. 19 - What is a rotating frame of reference?Ch. 19 - How will E for an isolated 13C nucleus compare...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.16QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.17QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.18QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.19QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.20QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.21QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.22QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.23QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.24QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.25QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.26QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.27QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.28QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.29QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.30QAPCh. 19 - The proton NMR spectrum in Figure 19.39 is for an...Ch. 19 - The proton NMR spectrum in Figure 19-40 is for a...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.33QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.34QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.35QAPCh. 19 - From the proton NMR spectrum in Figure 19-44,...Ch. 19 - From the proton spectrum given in Figure 19-45,...Ch. 19 - Prob. 19.38QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.39QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.40QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.41QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 19.42QAP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Is the bond length in 1HCl the same as that in 2HCl? The wavenumbers of the J = 1 ← 0 rotational transitions for 1H35Cl and 2H35Cl are 20.8784 and 10.7840 cm–1, respectively. Accurate atomic masses are 1.007 825mu and 2.0140mu for 1H and 2H, respectively. The mass of 35Cl is 34.968 85mu. Based on this information alone, can you conclude that the bond lengths are the same or different in the two molecules?arrow_forwardThe bond length of CO is 112.82 pm. What resolution is needed (in wavelength or wavenumber) if you desire to be able to distinguish the l = 0 → 1 rotational line in the rotational spectrum of 12C160 from 13C16O? The mass of 12C is 12 amu (this is an exact value). The mass of 13C is 13.00335 amu. The mass of 160 is 15.99491 amu.arrow_forwardThe chemical shift of the CH3 protons in acetaldehyde (ethanal) is δ = 2.20 and that of the CHO proton is 9.80. What is the difference in local magnetic field between the two regions of the molecule when the applied field is (a) 1.2 T, (b) 5.0 T?arrow_forward
- Sketch the form of an A3M2X4 spectrum, where A, M, and X are protons with distinctly different chemical shifts and JAM > JAX > JMX ·arrow_forwardDescribe the basic differences between fundamental vibrations and overtones in IR spectroscopy.arrow_forwardThe benzene radical anion has g = 2.0025. At whatfield should you search for resonance in a spectrometeroperating at (a) 9.302 GHz, (b) 33.67 GHz?arrow_forward
- (a) Calculate the energy difference between the two spin states of 1H and of 13C in a magnetic field of 6.8 T. 1H 4.0 1.91e-29 X J 13C 4.80e-33 X J (b) What is the precession frequency of a 'H nucleus at this magnetic field? Of a 13C nucleus? 1H 4.0 290 MHz 13C 4.0 73 MHz (c) At what magnetic field do protons precess at a frequency of 300. MHz? [4.0 7.04arrow_forward(a) Calculate the energy difference between the two spin states of 1H and of 13C in a magnetic field of 6.8 T. 1H 4.0 1.19e-25 X J 13C 4.0 J (b) What is the precession frequency of a 1H nucleus at this magnetic field? Of a 13C nucleus? 1H 4.0 290 MHz 13C 4.0 73 MHz (c) At what magnetic field do protons precess at a frequency of 300. MHz? 4.0 7.04 Tarrow_forwardThe 1H resonance from TMS is found to occur at 500.130 000 MHz. What is the chemical shift (on the δ scale) of a peak at 500.132 500 MHz?arrow_forward
- 4. Is the C=O stretching frequency the same for acetone and deuterated acetone? Explain your answer. Identify C O overtone in acetone spectrum which corresponds to the transitionn from ground level n= 0, to the second excited levarrow_forwardCalculate the magnetic fields that correspond to proton resonance frequencies of 300.00 MHz.arrow_forwardWhy is fluorescence generally more sensitive than absorption measurements?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Instrumental AnalysisChemistryISBN:9781305577213Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. CrouchPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Modern ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305079113Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. ButlerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305577213
Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Modern Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:9781305079113
Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. Butler
Publisher:Cengage Learning