Concept explainers
A 25.0-mL solution of 0.100 M
Interpretation:
The pH values of the solution after the addition of different volumes of
Concept introduction:
Acid–base titration is a technique used to analyze the unknown concentration of the acid or the base through the known concentration of the acid and base.
The equivalence point is the point in the acid–base titration of the chemical reaction where the number of moles of the titrant and the unknown concentration of the analyte are equal. It is used to identify the unknown concentration of the analyte.
The value of pH expresses the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a logarithmic scale.
When the value of pH is equal to
The formula to calculate the pH of a solution is:
pOH is a measure of the basicity of a solution, which depends on the concentration of hydroxide ions and the temperature of the solution.
The formula to calculate the pOH of a solution is:
The relation between pH and pOH is as:
A base dissociation constant, Kb, (also known base-ionization constant) is a quantitative measure of the strength of an base in solution.
The ionization of a weak base can be represented by the equation:
Where B is weak base and
The base ionization constant for a weak base is:
Where
An acid dissociation constant, Ka, (also known as acidity constant, or acid-ionization constant) is a quantitative measure of the strength of an acid in solution
The dissociation of a weak acid in an aqueous solution:
The acid ionization constant for a weak acid is:
The number of moles of compound initially present in the solution is calculated as:
The molarity of a compound is given by the expression as:
The pH of the buffer solution by the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation can be calculated as:
Answer to Problem 35QP
Solution:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Explanation of Solution
Given information: The concentration of
Explanation:
a)
The neutralization reaction between
From the above equation, 1 mole of
Let
The initial ionization change table for the ionization of
The equilibrium expression for the reaction is represented as follows:
Here,
Substitutes the values of
The value of
Concentration of
The value of
Substitute the value of
Hence, the
Explanation:
b)
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
On mixing the two solutions, the molarity of the solution changes, but the number of moles will remain the same.
The changes in the number of moles of
Determine the pH of the buffer solution by the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation. This is a basic buffer.
The pH of the buffer is calculated as follows:
Hence, the
Explanation:
c)
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
On mixing the two solutions, the molarity of the solution changes, but the number of moles will remain the same.
The changes in the number of moles of
Determine the pH of the buffer solution by the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation.
The pH of the buffer is calculated as follows:
Hence, the
Explanation:
d)
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
On mixing the two solutions, the molarity of the solution changes, but the number of moles will remain the same.
The changes in the number of moles of
At this stage, an equivalence point of the titration is reached.
The molarity of
Substitute the values of the number of moles and the volume of
Let
The initial concentration change for the ionization of
The equilibrium expression for the reaction is written as follows:
Here,
Substitute the values of
The value of x is very small as compared to
Concentration of
The
Substitute the value of
The value of
Hence, the
e)
Given information: The concentration of
Explanation:
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
The number of moles of
Substitute the values of the concentration and the volume of
On mixing the two solutions, the molarity of the solution changes, but the number of moles will remain the same.
The changes in the number of moles of
The molarity of
Substitute the values of the number of moles and the volume
The concentration of
The
Substitute the value of
The value of
Substitute the value of
Hence, the
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 17 Solutions
Chemistry
- Five chemistry project topic that does not involve practicalarrow_forwardPlease correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardQ2. Consider the hydrogenation of ethylene C2H4 + H2 = C2H6 The heats of combustion and molar entropies for the three gases at 298 K are given by: C2H4 C2H6 H2 AH comb/kJ mol¹ -1395 -1550 -243 Sº / J K¹ mol-1 220.7 230.4 131.1 The average heat capacity change, ACP, for the reaction over the temperature range 298-1000 K is 10.9 J K¹ mol¹. Using these data, determine: (a) the standard enthalpy change at 800 K (b) the standard entropy change at 800 K (c) the equilibrium constant at 800 K.arrow_forward
- 13. (11pts total) Consider the arrows pointing at three different carbon-carbon bonds in the molecule depicted below. Bond B Bond A Bond C a. (2pts) Which bond between A-C is weakest? Which is strongest? Place answers in appropriate boxes. Weakest Bond Strongest Bond b. (4pts) Consider the relative stability of all cleavage products that form when bonds A, B, AND C are homolytically cleaved/broken. Hint: cleavage products of bonds A, B, and C are all carbon radicals. i. Which ONE cleavage product is the most stable? A condensed or bond line representation is fine. ii. Which ONE cleavage product is the least stable? A condensed or bond line representation is fine. c. (5pts) Use principles discussed in lecture, supported by relevant structures, to succinctly explain the why your part b (i) radical is more stable than your part b(ii) radical. Written explanation can be no more than one-two succinct sentence(s)! Googlearrow_forwardPrint Last Name, First Name Initial Statifically more chances to abstract one of these 6H 11. (10pts total) Consider the radical chlorination of 1,3-diethylcyclohexane depicted below. 4 4th total • 6H total 래 • 4H total 21 total ZH 2H Statistical H < 3° C-H weakest - product abstraction here bund leads to thermo favored a) (6pts) How many unique mono-chlorinated products can be formed and what are the structures for the thermodynamically and statistically favored products? Product 6 Number of Unique Mono-Chlorinated Products Thermodynamically Favored Product Statistically Favored Product b) (4pts) Draw the arrow pushing mechanism for the FIRST propagation step (p-1) for the formation of the thermodynamically favored product. Only draw the p-1 step. You do not need to include lone pairs of electrons. No enthalpy calculation necessary H H-Cl Waterfoxarrow_forward10. (5pts) Provide the complete arrow pushing mechanism for the chemical transformation → depicted below Use proper curved arrow notation that explicitly illustrates all bonds being broken, and all bonds formed in the transformation. Also, be sure to include all lone pairs and formal charges on all atoms involved in the flow of electrons. CH3O II HA H CH3O-H H ①arrow_forward
- Do the Lone Pairs get added bc its valence e's are a total of 6 for oxygen and that completes it or due to other reasons. How do we know the particular indication of such.arrow_forwardNGLISH b) Identify the bonds present in the molecule drawn (s) above. (break) State the function of the following equipments found in laboratory. Omka) a) Gas mask b) Fire extinguisher c) Safety glasses 4. 60cm³ of oxygen gas diffused through a porous hole in 50 seconds. How long w 80cm³ of sulphur(IV) oxide to diffuse through the same hole under the same conditions (S-32.0.0-16.0) (3 m 5. In an experiment, a piece of magnesium ribbon was cleaned with steel w clean magnesium ribbon was placed in a crucible and completely burnt in oxy cooling the product weighed 4.0g a) Explain why it is necessary to clean magnesium ribbon. Masterclass Holiday assignmen PB 2arrow_forwardHi!! Please provide a solution that is handwritten. Ensure all figures, reaction mechanisms (with arrows and lone pairs please!!), and structures are clearly drawn to illustrate the synthesis of the product as per the standards of a third year organic chemistry course. ****the solution must include all steps, mechanisms, and intermediate structures as required. Please hand-draw the mechanisms and structures to support your explanation. Don’t give me AI-generated diagrams or text-based explanations, no wordy explanations on how to draw the structures I need help with the exact mechanism hand drawn by you!!! I am reposting this—ensure all parts of the question are straightforward and clear or please let another expert handle it thanks!!arrow_forward
- In three dimensions, explain the concept of the velocity distribution function of particles within the kinetic theory of gases.arrow_forwardIn the kinetic theory of gases, explain the concept of the velocity distribution function of particles in space.arrow_forwardIn the kinetic theory of gases, explain the concept of the velocity distribution function of particles.arrow_forward
- Principles of Modern ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305079113Author:David W. Oxtoby, H. Pat Gillis, Laurie J. ButlerPublisher:Cengage LearningGeneral Chemistry - Standalone book (MindTap Cour...ChemistryISBN:9781305580343Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; DarrellPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781337399074Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage Learning