Understanding Our Universe
3rd Edition
ISBN: 9780393614428
Author: PALEN, Stacy, Kay, Laura, Blumenthal, George (george Ray)
Publisher: W.w. Norton & Company,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 40QAP
(a)
To determine
The energy released in the annihilation of hydrogen atoms.
(b)
To determine
The amount of energy released compared with the energy released by
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
I'm having trouble understanding this.
Suppose we have a spaceship about the size of a typical ocean cruise ship today, which means it has a mass of about 130 million kilograms, and we want to accelerate the ship to a speed of 12 % of the speed of light. Suppose you want to generate the energy to get it to cruising speed using matter-antimatter annihilation.
How much antimatter would you need to produce and take on the ship?
Express your answer using two significant figures.
Assume the observable Universe is charge neutral, and that it contains n nuclei (hydrogen plus helium nuclei, ignoring other elements). Take the helium mass fraction as 1/4. How many electrons are there in the observable Universe? Enter your answer in scientific notation with one decimal place.
Using our example from the previous unit, let's try to determine the Hubble time for this example universe. You were given that a good representative galaxy receded at a speed of 4000 km/s and was found to be 20 Mpc away. With that in mind, what would the age of that universe be in years (aka what is that universe's Hubble time)? Go ahead and take the number of kilometers per Mpc to be approximately 3.1*10^19 km/Mpc. While this problem may look scary at first, this is really just bringing you full circle to one of the unit conversion problems you encountered at the beginning of this course.
Chapter 16 Solutions
Understanding Our Universe
Ch. 16.1 - Prob. 16.1CYUCh. 16.2 - Prob. 16.2CYUCh. 16.3 - Prob. 16.3CYUCh. 16.4 - Prob. 16.4CYUCh. 16.5 - Prob. 16.5CYUCh. 16.6 - Prob. 16.6CYUCh. 16 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 4QAP
Ch. 16 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 6QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 7QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 8QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 9QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 10QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 11QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 12QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 13QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 14QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 15QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 16QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 17QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 18QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 19QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 20QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 21QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 22QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 24QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 25QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 26QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 27QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 28QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 29QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 30QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 31QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 32QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 33QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 34QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 35QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 36QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 37QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 38QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 39QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 40QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 41QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 42QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 43QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 44QAPCh. 16 - Prob. 45QAP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, physics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 Cosmic background data from COBE 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.5 10 Wavelength A in mm c) Background (CMB) undertaken by the COBE satellite. Use this diagram to estimate the current temperature of the CMB. Based on your estimate, what would the temperature of the CMB have been at a redshift of z = 5000? The left hand diagram above shows the results from observations of the Cosmic Microwave Radiated Intensity per Unit Wavelength (16° Watts/m per mm)arrow_forward1. The current (critical) density of our universe is pe = 10-26kg/m³. Assume the universe is filled with cubes with equal size that each contain one person of m = 100kg. What would the length of the side of such a cube have to be in order to give the correct critical density? How many hydrogen atoms would you need in a box of 1 m³ to reach the critical density? The matter we know, which consists mostly of hydrogen, constitutes only 4.8% of the current critical energy density of our universe. So how many hydrogen atoms are actually in a box of 1 m3 in our universe? Deep space is very empty and a much better vacuum than we can obtain on earth in a laboratory.arrow_forwardI asked the following question and was given the attached solution: Suppose that the universe were full of spherical objects, each of mass m and radius r . If the objects were distributed uniformly throughout the universe, what number density (#/m3) of spherical objects would be required to make the density equal to the critical density of our Universe? Values: m = 4 kg r = 0.0407 m Answer must be in scientific notation and include zero decimal places (1 sig fig --- e.g., 1234 should be written as 1*10^3) I don't follow the work and I got the wrong answer, so please help and show your work as I do not follow along easily thanksarrow_forward
- Your friends are talking about Olber's Paradox: Friend 1: When the universe was quite young, it was also quite small, and therefore light was trapped inside the universe. This is why we don't see light from the edge of the universe in every direction. Friend 2: No, Olber's Paradox describes only light from stars, not from galaxies, and why you can't use light from distant stars to see at night. Friend 3: You're both right and you're both wrong. The paradox concerns itself with the expansion of the universe, and explains why light from the early universe was able to be released. Are any of them right, in part or in whole?arrow_forwardmathematician Archimedes, responding to a claim that the number of grains of sand was infinite, calculated that the number of grains of sand needed to fill the universe was on the order of 1063. Our understanding of the size of the universe has changed since then, and we now know that the observable universe alone is a sphere with a radius of 1026 m. Estimating the size of a grain of sand, A) Approximately how many grains of sand would fill the observable universe? B) How many times larger or smaller is this number than Archimedes' result?arrow_forwardHubble's First Attempt. Edwin Hubble's first attempt to measure the universe's expansion rate was flawed because the standard candles he was using were not properly calibrated. Look at (Figure 1) a.Estimate the value of Ho corresponding to the solid line in the figure. Express your answer kilometers per second per million light-years to two significant figures. b.What is the approximate age of the universe indicated by that erroneous value of Ho? Express your answer in years to one significant figure.arrow_forward
- Consider three periods in the history of the Universe: one million years after the Big Bang (age = 1 million years), about five billion years ago (age = 9 billion years), and today. What is the ranking in the expansion rate of the Universe in these three period, from fastest to slowest expansion: O 1 million years, today, 9 billion years. today, 1 million years, 9 billion years. today, 9 billion years, 1 million years. O 1 million years, 9 billion years, today.arrow_forwardWhat are some answers to the Fermi paradox? Can you think of some that are not discussed in this chapter?arrow_forwardWhat does the term Hubble time mean in cosmology, and what is the current best calculation for the Hubble time?arrow_forward
- Suppose you are standing in the center of a large, densely populated city that is exactly circular, surrounded by a ring of suburbs with lower-density population, surrounded in turn by a ring of farmland. From this specific location, would you say the population distribution is isotropic? Homogeneous?arrow_forwardWhy couldnt atomic nuclei exist when the Universe was less than about 2 minutes old?arrow_forwardExplain what we mean when we call the universe homogeneous and isotropic. Would you say that the distribution of elephants on Earth is homogeneous and isotropic? Why?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
AstronomyPhysicsISBN:9781938168284Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. WolffPublisher:OpenStax
Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage Learning
Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage Learning
Modern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage Learning
Astronomy
Physics
ISBN:9781938168284
Author:Andrew Fraknoi; David Morrison; Sidney C. Wolff
Publisher:OpenStax
Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)
Physics
ISBN:9781337399920
Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana Backman
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Stars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)
Physics
ISBN:9781337399944
Author:Michael A. Seeds
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Modern Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781111794378
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. Moyer
Publisher:Cengage Learning