Your friends are talking about Olber's Paradox: Friend 1: When the universe was quite young, it was also quite small, and therefore light was trapped inside the universe. This is why we don't see light from the edge of the universe in every direction. Friend 2: No, Olber's Paradox describes only light from stars, not from galaxies, and why you can't use light from distant stars to see at night. Friend 3: You're both right and you're both wrong. The paradox concerns itself with the expansion of the universe, and explains why light from the early universe was able to be released. Are any of them right, in part or in whole?

icon
Related questions
Question
Your friends are talking about Olber's Paradox:
Friend 1: When the universe was quite young, it was also quite small, and therefore light
was trapped inside the universe. This is why we don't see light from the edge of the
universe in every direction.
Friend 2: No, Olber's Paradox describes only light from stars, not from galaxies, and why
you can't use light from distant stars to see at night.
Friend 3: You're both right and you're both wrong. The paradox concerns itself with the
expansion of the universe, and explains why light from the early universe was able to be
released.
Are any of them right, in part or in whole?
Transcribed Image Text:Your friends are talking about Olber's Paradox: Friend 1: When the universe was quite young, it was also quite small, and therefore light was trapped inside the universe. This is why we don't see light from the edge of the universe in every direction. Friend 2: No, Olber's Paradox describes only light from stars, not from galaxies, and why you can't use light from distant stars to see at night. Friend 3: You're both right and you're both wrong. The paradox concerns itself with the expansion of the universe, and explains why light from the early universe was able to be released. Are any of them right, in part or in whole?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer