EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 1.3, Problem 1TTA
To determine
Whether the assumption that animals consciously choose an optimal strategy for dealing with the scarcity of resources make sense or not.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Thank you! Would you be able to answer the final part?
Derive a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium (MSNE). What is the proportion of Hawks and Doves? If the proportion of Hawks in the population of animals is greater than the mixed strategy equilibrium proportion you calculated, which strategy does better, Hawks or Doves?
(a) Find all allocations that are Pareto efficient in the Prisoners' dilemma game.
Does moving from an allocation where both players defect to an allocation
where one defects and the other cooperate feature a Pareto improvement?
The town of Grayling has 10 thousand residents who produce fish from fish farms and lakes. Each person who works on a fish farm produces
2 fish per day. Each person who fishes in a lake produces 10-X fish per day where X is the number of people (in thousands) who fish in the
lakes. If every individual who fishes a lake is charged a tax of T fish, what value of T causes the Nash Equilibrium behavior to produce the
largest possible number of fish for the town as a whole? (You can assume that the 'taxes' collected are shared among all of the residents)
Chapter 1 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
Ch. 1.2 - Prob. 1MQCh. 1.2 - Prob. 2MQCh. 1.3 - Prob. 1TTACh. 1.3 - Prob. 2TTACh. 1.4 - Prob. 1TTACh. 1.4 - Prob. 2TTACh. 1.4 - Prob. 1MQCh. 1.4 - Prob. 2MQCh. 1.4 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 1.4 - Prob. 1.2MQ
Ch. 1.5 - Prob. 1TTACh. 1.5 - Prob. 2TTACh. 1 - Prob. 1RQCh. 1 - Prob. 2RQCh. 1 - Prob. 3RQCh. 1 - Prob. 4RQCh. 1 - Prob. 5RQCh. 1 - Prob. 6RQCh. 1 - Prob. 7RQCh. 1 - Prob. 8RQCh. 1 - Prob. 9RQCh. 1 - Prob. 10RQCh. 1 - Prob. 1.1PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.2PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.3PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.4PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.5PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.6PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.7PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.8PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.9PCh. 1 - Prob. 1.10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 100 people are choosing between two beaches to go to in the Florida Keys. Beach L is big and never gets crowded, but it is not very nice; the utility from going to Beach L is u(L) = 60. Beach M is much nicer but very small, so it gets crowded; the utility from going to Beach M is u(M) = 100-NM ; NM is the number of people that %3D go to Beach M. 5) The Nash equilibrium number of people that go to Beach L is A) 20 B) 40 C) 60 D) 80 E) 100 5).arrow_forwardThis is an easy question from economics NASH EQUILIBRIUMarrow_forwardOn Sundays, people in Los Angeles consider a boat to Catalina Island to spend the day on the beach there. The utility that a person gets from visiting Catalina is 1-[n/10] – p , where n is the number of visitors on the island and p is the price of round-trip transportation (by boat). (Note that a visitor obtains more satisfaction if there are fewer other visitors on the island). The utility of staying home is zero. In equilibrium, how many people visit the island on a given Sunday? ( Your answer should depend on p.)arrow_forward
- Our classroom needs a better webcam. A webcam benefits everyone and I am soliciting donations from the class. There are N students, and each student possesses a token. A webcam costs K tokens. K is greater than 2, but less than N. Now, the action of each student is to either donate a token or avoid me. Find the Nash equilibrium/equilibria. Give an answer with reasoning.arrow_forwardSuppose that Abe and his brother Moe are lost in the desert and are in need of guidance to find an oasis. They can seek such guidance from either a burning bush or a golden calf. Abe has the following preferences: • If Moe chooses to talk to the golden calf, Abe prefers the outcome where he to chooses to talk to the golden calf than talk to the burning bush. • If Moe chooses to talk to the burning bush, Abe is indifferent between the outcome where he choose to talk to the burning bush and the outcome where he chooses to talk to the golden calf. • Regardless of his own decision, Abe prefers all outcomes where Moe talks to the burning bush than if he chose to talk to the golden calf. Moe has the following preferences: • If Abe chooses to talk to the golden calf, Moe prefers the outcome where he chooses to talk to the golden calf than talking to the burning bush. • If Abe chooses to talk to the burning bush, Moe prefers the outcome where he chooses to talk to the golden calf than talking…arrow_forwardYou have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.arrow_forward
- In Las Vegas, roulette is played on a wheel with 38 slots, of which 18 are black, 18 are red, and 2 are green (zero and double-zero). Your friend impulsively takes all $361 out of his pocket and bets it on black, which pays 1 for 1. This means that if the ball lands on one of the 18 black slots, he ends up with $722, and if it doesn't, he ends up with nothing. Once the croupier releases the ball, your friend panics; it turns out that the $361 he bet was literally all the money he has. While he is risk-averse - his utility function is u(x) =, where x is his roulette payoff - you are effectively risk neutral over such small stakes. a. When the ball is still spinning, what is the expected profit for the casino? b. When the ball is still spinning, what is the expected value of your friend's wealth? c. When the ball is still spinning, what is your friend's certainty equivalent (i.e., how much money would he accept with certainty to walk away from his bet). Say you propose the following…arrow_forwardOwen and Simon both like playing with balls and cars. Suppose B represents the number of balls, and C represents the number of cars. If Owen's utility function can be given by U(B, C) = 10B + 5C, and Simon's utility function can be given by U(B, C) = 6B + 6C, which of the following trades would be mutually beneficial? Ⓒa. Owen gives Simon 2 balls in exchange for 3 cars b. Owen gives Simon 2 cars in exchange for 3 balls ⒸC. Owen gives Simon 3 cars in exchange for 2 balls Ⓒd. Owen gives Simon 3 balls in exchange for 2 carsarrow_forwardQ2. The Prisoners' Dilemma: Jill Confess Remain Silent Confess Bob: 8 years Jill: 8 years Bob: Free Jill: 20 years Bob Remain Silent Bob: 20 years Jill: Free Bob: 1 year Jill: 1 year 2A: Find Nash equilibrium? 28. Is the Nash equilibrium best outcome for them? 2C. If your answer of Q2 is 'No', then why they choose an outcome which is not best for them.arrow_forward
- (4) Resource Allocation. Consider a combinatorial auction with three items {a,b,c} and three players (I, II, III. The valuations each player has for each subset of a b с ab bс ас abc I 1 2 1 6 4 11 II 3 5 3 3 5 III| 4 5 0 7 5 7 the items is shown below. What is the allocation produced under the VCG (Vickrey-Clarke-Groves) mechanism and what are the VCG payments of the players?arrow_forwardCommon pool resource game) Consider a common pool resource game with two appropriators. (If you don’t know what is a common pool resource, read the Wikipedia article about the ”Tragedy of the Commons”.) Each appropriator has an endowment e > 0 that can be invested in an outside activity with marginal payoff c > 0 or into the common pool resource. Let x ∈ X ⊆ [0, e] denote the player’s investment into the common pool resource (likewise, y denotes the opponent’s investment). The return from investment into the common pool resource is x x+y · ((x + y) − (x + y) 2 ). So the symmetric payoff function is given by π(x, y) = c · (e − x) + x x+y · ((x + y) − (x + y) 2 ) if x > 0 and c · e otherwise. Assume 1 − e < c < 1. Find Nash equilibrium of the game. Proceed by deriving the best response correspondences first. How does Nash equilibrium depend on parameters c and e (varying one at a time and keeping the others fixed)?arrow_forwardCompetitive general equilibrium Amy(A) and Brian (B) have the following utility function U^A= 2XaYa, U^B= √XbYb Were there endowment of consumption good X and Y are as follows: Xa= 60 Ya = 80 Xd=30 Yb=180 At the endowment point what is the marginal rate of substitution of X for Y for Amy? For Brian? Find the competitive equilibrium price of the goods at which the consumers trade with each other In the competitive equilibrium for each unit of good Y how many units of good X can be exchanged. Find both brian and amy preferred consumption bundles in the equilibrium Is the allocation of resources achieved in part d pareto-optimal? Explain. Draw the edgeworth box that shows all possible allocations and plot the endowment points. Plot the indifferent curves of the two consumers and the contract curve in the edgeworth box as well.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning