Concept explainers
For Exercises 28 through 33, do a complete
a. Draw a
b. Compute the
c. State the hypotheses.
d. Test the hypotheses at α = 0.05. Use Table I.
e. Determine the regression line equation if r is significant.
f. Plot the regression line on the scatter plot, if appropriate.
g. Summarize the results.
31. Coal Production These data were obtained from a sample of counties in southwestern Pennsylvania and indicate the number (in thousands) of tons of bituminous coal produced in each county and the number of employees working in coal production in each county. Predict the amount of coal produced for a county that has 500 employees.
a.
To construct: The scatterplot for the variables the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production.
Answer to Problem 31E
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data shows the number of employees working in coal production (x) and the number of tons (in thousands) (y) values.
Calculation:
Step by step procedure to obtain scatterplot using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple and then click OK.
- Under Y variables, enter a column of No.of eployees.
- Under X variables, enter a column of Tons.
- Click OK.
b.
To compute: The value of the correlation coefficient.
Answer to Problem 31E
The value of the correlation coefficient is 0.970.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Correlation coefficient r:
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the ‘correlation coefficient’ using the MINITAB software:
- Select Stat > Basic Statistics > Correlation.
- In Variables, select x and y from the box on the left.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the value of the correlation is 0.970.
c.
To state: The hypothesis.
Answer to Problem 31E
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
That is, there is no linear relation between the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production.
Alternative hypothesis:
That is, there is a linear relation between the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production.
d.
To test: The significance of the correlation coefficient at
Answer to Problem 31E
The conclusion is that, there is a sufficient evidence to support the claim that linear relation between the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The level of significance is
Calculation:
The sample size is 8.
The formula to find the degrees of the freedom is
That is,
From the “TABLE –I: Critical Values for the PPMC”, the critical value for 4 degrees of freedom and
Rejection Rule:
If the absolute value of r is greater than the critical value then reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
From part (b), the value of r is 0.970 that is the absolute value of r is 0.970.
Here, the absolute value of r is greater than the critical value
That is,
By the rejection rule, reject the null hypothesis.
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that “there is a linear relation between the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production”.
e.
To find: The regression equation for the given data.
Answer to Problem 31E
The regression equation for the given data is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Regression:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain the regression equation using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Regression > Regression.
- In Responses, enter the column of Tons.
- In Predictors, enter the column of No.of employees.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Thus, regression equation for the given data is
f.
To construct: The scatterplot for the variables the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production with regression line.
Answer to Problem 31E
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Step by step procedure to obtain scatterplot using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose with line and then click OK.
- Under Y variables, enter a column of No.of eployees.
- Under X variables, enter a column of Tons.
- Click OK.
g.
To summarize: The results.
Answer to Problem 31E
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
Thus, there is a sufficient evidence to support the claim that linear relation between the number of employees and the number of tons in coal production.
h.
To obtain: The predicted value of the coal produced for a county that has 500 employees.
Answer to Problem 31E
The predicted value of the coal is 3,317.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Thus, regression equation for the given data is
Substitute x as 500 in the regression equation
Thus, the predicted value of the coal is 3,317.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Elementary Statistics: A Step By Step Approach
- Find the equation of the regression line for the following data set. x 1 2 3 y 0 3 4arrow_forwardLife Expectancy The following table shows the average life expectancy, in years, of a child born in the given year42 Life expectancy 2005 77.6 2007 78.1 2009 78.5 2011 78.7 2013 78.8 a. Find the equation of the regression line, and explain the meaning of its slope. b. Plot the data points and the regression line. c. Explain in practical terms the meaning of the slope of the regression line. d. Based on the trend of the regression line, what do you predict as the life expectancy of a child born in 2019? e. Based on the trend of the regression line, what do you predict as the life expectancy of a child born in 1580?2300arrow_forwardOlympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?arrow_forward
- Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillCollege AlgebraAlgebraISBN:9781305115545Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem WatsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305071742Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem WatsonPublisher:Cengage Learning