
Concept explainers
Stopping Distances
In a study on speed control, it was found that the main reasons for regulations were to make traffic flow more efficient and to minimize the risk of danger. An area that was focused on in the study was the distance required to completely stop a vehicle at various speeds. Use the following table to answer the questions.
MPH | Braking distance (feet) |
20 30 40 50 60 80 |
20 45 81 133 205 411 |
Assume MPH is going to be used to predict stopping distance.
1. Which of the two variables is the independent variable?
2. Which is the dependent variable?
3. What type of variable is the independent variable?
4. What type of variable is the dependent variable?
5. Construct a
6. Is there a linear relationship between the two variables?
7. Redraw the scatter plot, and change the distances between the independent-variable numbers. Does the relationship look different?
8. Is the relationship positive or negative?
9. Can braking distance be accurately predicted from MPH?
10.List some other variables that affect braking distance.
11. Compute the value of r.
12. Is r significant at α = 0.05?
1.

To identify: The independent variable.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The independent variable is MPH (miles per hour).
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The table shows the MPH (miles per hour) and Braking distance in feet.
Calculation:
Independent variable:
If the variable does not dependent on the other variables then the variables are said to be independent variable.
Here, the variable “Miles per hour” does not depend on the other variables. Thus, the independent variable is MPH (miles per hour).
2.

To identify: The dependent variable.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The dependent variable is Braking distance (feet).
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Dependent variable:
If the variable depends on the other variables then the variable is said to be dependent variable.
Here, the variable “Braking distance” depends on the other variables. That is the variable braking distance depends on the MPH (miles per hour). Thus, the dependent variable is Braking distance (feet).
3.

The type of variable is the independent variable.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The type of independent variable is the continuous quantitative variable.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
Continuous quantitative variable:
If the variable takes values on interval scale then the variable is said to be continuous quantitative variable. In the continuous variable, the infinitely many number of values can be considered.
Here, the independent variable miles per hour (MPH) can take any value from a wide range of values. Thus, the independent variable miles per hour (MPH) is continuous quantitative variable.
4.

The type of variable is the dependent variable.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The type of dependent variable is the continuous quantitative variable.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
Here, the dependent variable braking distance (feet) can take any value from a wide range of values. Thus, the independent variable braking distance (feet) is continuous quantitative variable.
5.

To construct: The scatterplot for the data.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The scatterplot for the data given data using Minitab software is:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The data shows the MPH (miles per hour) and Braking distance (feet) for vehicles.
Step by step procedure to obtain scatterplot using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple and then click OK.
- Under Y variables, enter a column of Braking distance (feet).
- Under X variables, enter a column of MPH.
- Click OK.
6.

To check: Whether there is a linear relationship between the two variables.
Answer to Problem 1AC
Yes, there is a linear relationship between the two variables.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
The horizontal axis represents miles per hour (MPH) and vertical axis represents braking distance (feet).
From the plot, it is observed that there is a linear relationship between the variables miles per hour (MPH) and braking distance (feet) because the data points show a distinct pattern.
7.

To construct: The scatterplot for the changed data.
To check: Whether the relationship looks different or not.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The scatterplot for the changed data by using Minitab software is:
The increments will change the appearance of the relationship if changing the distance between the independent-variable (mph).
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The data shows the MPH (miles per hour) and Braking distance (feet) for vehicles.
After changing the distance between the independent-variable numbers, the number of the independent-variable is, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120.
Step by step procedure to obtain scatterplot using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Scatterplot.
- Choose Simple and then click OK.
- Under Y variables, enter a column of Braking distance (feet).
- Under X variables, enter a column of MPH.
- Click OK.
Justification:
From the graphs it can be observed that, after changing the distance between the independent-variable (mph), the increments will change the appearance of the relationship.
8.

To check: Whether the relationship is positive or negative.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The relationship is positive.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
The relationship is positive because the values of independent variable increases then the values of corresponding dependent variable are increases.
9.

To check: Whether the braking distance can be accurately predicted from MPH.
Answer to Problem 1AC
Yes, the braking distance can be accurately predicted from MPH.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
Here, the braking distance can be accurately predicted from MPH because the relationship between two variables MPH and Breaking distance is strong.
10.

To list: The other variables that affect braking distance.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The other variables that affect braking distance are road conditions, driver response time and condition of the brakes.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
Answer may wary. One of the possible answers is as follows.
The variable affecting the braking distance are road conditions, driver response time and condition of the brakes.
11.

To compute: The value of r.
Answer to Problem 1AC
The value of r is 0.966.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Correlation coefficient r:
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the ‘correlation coefficient’ using the MINITAB software:
- Select Stat > Basic Statistics > Correlation.
- In Variables, select MPH and Braking distance (feet) from the box on the left.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
Thus, the Pearson correlation of MPH and Braking distance is 0.966.
12.

To check: Whether or not the r value is significant at 0.05.
Answer to Problem 1AC
Yes, the r value is significant at 0.05.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Here, the r value is significant is checked. So, the claim is that the r value is significant.
The hypotheses are given below:
Null hypothesis:
H0:ρ=0
That is, there is no linear relation between the MPH and Braking distance.
Alternative hypothesis:
H1:ρ≠0
That is, there is linear relation between the MPH and Braking distance.
The sample size is 6.
The formula to find the degrees of the freedom is n−2.
That is,
n−2=6−2=4
From the “TABLE –I: Critical Values for the PPMC”, the critical value for 4 degrees of freedom and α=0.05 level of significance is 0.811.
Rejection Rule:
If the absolute value of r is greater than the critical value then reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
From part (11), the Pearson correlation of MPH and Braking distance is 0.966. That is the absolute value of r is 0.966.
Here, |r|>critical value. That is, 0.966>0.811.
By the rejection rule, reject the null hypothesis.
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that “there is a linear relation between the MPH and Braking distance”.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Elementary Statistics: A Step By Step Approach
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Introductory Statistics
Elementary & Intermediate Algebra
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Calculus: Early Transcendentals (2nd Edition)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th Edition)
Basic College Mathematics
- An electronics company manufactures batches of n circuit boards. Before a batch is approved for shipment, m boards are randomly selected from the batch and tested. The batch is rejected if more than d boards in the sample are found to be faulty. a) A batch actually contains six faulty circuit boards. Find the probability that the batch is rejected when n = 20, m = 5, and d = 1. b) A batch actually contains nine faulty circuit boards. Find the probability that the batch is rejected when n = 30, m = 10, and d = 1.arrow_forwardTwenty-eight applicants interested in working for the Food Stamp program took an examination designed to measure their aptitude for social work. A stem-and-leaf plot of the 28 scores appears below, where the first column is the count per branch, the second column is the stem value, and the remaining digits are the leaves. a) List all the values. Count 1 Stems Leaves 4 6 1 4 6 567 9 3688 026799 9 8 145667788 7 9 1234788 b) Calculate the first quartile (Q1) and the third Quartile (Q3). c) Calculate the interquartile range. d) Construct a boxplot for this data.arrow_forwardPam, Rob and Sam get a cake that is one-third chocolate, one-third vanilla, and one-third strawberry as shown below. They wish to fairly divide the cake using the lone chooser method. Pam likes strawberry twice as much as chocolate or vanilla. Rob only likes chocolate. Sam, the chooser, likes vanilla and strawberry twice as much as chocolate. In the first division, Pam cuts the strawberry piece off and lets Rob choose his favorite piece. Based on that, Rob chooses the chocolate and vanilla parts. Note: All cuts made to the cake shown below are vertical.Which is a second division that Rob would make of his share of the cake?arrow_forward
- Three players (one divider and two choosers) are going to divide a cake fairly using the lone divider method. The divider cuts the cake into three slices (s1, s2, and s3). If the choosers' declarations are Chooser 1: {s1 , s2} and Chooser 2: {s2 , s3}. Using the lone-divider method, how many different fair divisions of this cake are possible?arrow_forwardTheorem 2.6 (The Minkowski inequality) Let p≥1. Suppose that X and Y are random variables, such that E|X|P <∞ and E|Y P <00. Then X+YpX+Yparrow_forwardTheorem 1.2 (1) Suppose that P(|X|≤b) = 1 for some b > 0, that EX = 0, and set Var X = 0². Then, for 0 0, P(X > x) ≤e-x+1²² P(|X|>x) ≤2e-1x+1²² (ii) Let X1, X2...., Xn be independent random variables with mean 0, suppose that P(X ≤b) = 1 for all k, and set oσ = Var X. Then, for x > 0. and 0x) ≤2 exp Σ k=1 (iii) If, in addition, X1, X2, X, are identically distributed, then P(S|x) ≤2 expl-tx+nt²o).arrow_forward
- Theorem 5.1 (Jensen's inequality) state without proof the Jensen's Ineg. Let X be a random variable, g a convex function, and suppose that X and g(X) are integrable. Then g(EX) < Eg(X).arrow_forwardCan social media mistakes hurt your chances of finding a job? According to a survey of 1,000 hiring managers across many different industries, 76% claim that they use social media sites to research prospective candidates for any job. Calculate the probabilities of the following events. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) answer parts a-c. a) Out of 30 job listings, at least 19 will conduct social media screening. b) Out of 30 job listings, fewer than 17 will conduct social media screening. c) Out of 30 job listings, exactly between 19 and 22 (including 19 and 22) will conduct social media screening. show all steps for probabilities please. answer parts a-c.arrow_forwardQuestion: we know that for rt. (x+ys s ا. 13. rs. and my so using this, show that it vye and EIXI, EIYO This : E (IX + Y) ≤2" (EIX (" + Ely!")arrow_forward
- Theorem 2.4 (The Hölder inequality) Let p+q=1. If E|X|P < ∞ and E|Y| < ∞, then . |EXY ≤ E|XY|||X|| ||||qarrow_forwardTheorem 7.6 (Etemadi's inequality) Let X1, X2, X, be independent random variables. Then, for all x > 0, P(max |S|>3x) ≤3 max P(S| > x). Isk≤narrow_forwardTheorem 7.2 Suppose that E X = 0 for all k, that Var X = 0} x) ≤ 2P(S>x 1≤k≤n S√2), -S√2). P(max Sk>x) ≤ 2P(|S|>x- 1arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillFunctions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage LearningBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
- Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALAlgebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305071742Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem WatsonPublisher:Cengage LearningCollege AlgebraAlgebraISBN:9781305115545Author:James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem WatsonPublisher:Cengage Learning





