Fraction of molecules in R form when 1, 2, 3, and 4 ligands are bound should be determined. Concept introduction: The concerted model of allosteric transition suggests the bonding of the ligand molecules to the enzyme. It suggests that there are 2 main states, tensed and relaxed state. In tensed state, no molecule is bound to the enzyme and in relaxed state, all the molecules are bound to the enzyme.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 13P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

Fraction of molecules in R form when 1, 2, 3, and 4 ligands are bound should be determined.

Concept introduction:

The concerted model of allosteric transition suggests the bonding of the ligand molecules to the enzyme. It suggests that there are 2 main states, tensed and relaxed state. In tensed state, no molecule is bound to the enzyme and in relaxed state, all the molecules are bound to the enzyme.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Ligand binding and response. The following question involves the ligand binding to a receptor and the receptor's response to that ligand. What ligand concentration would be required for a full agonist with a KD of 8 nM to achieve a response of 0.75?

Inducers and Inhibitors of AEP. Short peptides such as legumain stabilization and activity modulation (LSAM) domain and αvβ3 integrin could enhance the activity of AEP. LSAM domain known as the prodomain of AEP blocks substrate binding before activation. This prodomain has a helical structure and two independent peptides. One is an activation peptide (AP, K287 to N323), and the other is a LSAM domain. LSAM domain remains even after AP is cleaved and released from protease at neutral pH via electrostatic interaction. AEP without LSAM domain has a lower melting temperature than AEP with LSAM domain [77, 117]. Another short peptide, αvβ3 integrin, can directly interact with AEP, and after forming a complex, the optimal pH for AEP activity is increased from 5.5 to 6.0. It indicates that αvβ3 binding could induce conformational stabilization of AEP accompanied by deprotonated C189. αvβ3 does not directly interact with the AEP active site; however, AEP docks to the αvβ3 RGD-binding site…

Need help. Plz explain briefly Describe in detail with the aid of diagrams the use of chemical shift perturbation mapping to identify ligand binding sites on a protein.