Which of the following statements is not true of the transformational approach to leadership, according to Burns (1978)? Group of answer choices The difference between power and leadership is that power serves the interests of the leader. Power is exercised when potential power wielders gather resources that enable them to influence others. Power is exercised to realize the purposes of the power wielders, whether or not those purposes also are the purposes of the respondents. Leadership is an aspect of power, but is a separate process

What points resonate with you regarding leadership and why? Give your thoughts and explain Special Demands and the Working Environment Reengineering and Leadership Responsibilities, Duties, and Tasks Effects of the ADA on Position Descriptions

Which of the following type of leader assumes his function like a father? a. Paternalistic leader b. Participative leader c. Democratic leader d. Autocratic leader

According to French & Raven bases of power include(s):   Select one: a. Reward power b. Expert power c. Coercive power d. All of the above

Does the end justify the means? Assuming the responsibility of leadership, a leader also assumes the ethical boundaries that accompany it. Many leaders have relied on illegal or unethical tactics to achieve their goals. For this assignment, use the Internet to find 2 articles in the last 6 months that discuss the decision of the same leader of an organization that was considered illegal or unethical by the authors. Your articles should be found online in the popular press or a professional journal. Be sure to apply the material from your text to your discussion. Directions: For your first post, describe the key points of each article and detail why the author of the article found it illegal or unethical. Evaluate the leader's ethical awareness or standards, (apply the course material). This discussion will be at least 300 words. (Be sure to reference your articles in APA format).

Which of the following statements concerning the effects of charismatic leadership on followers, is NOT true?   Followers have confidence in the leader, but not in themselves.   Followers are motivated to set or aim for higher goals and ideals.   Followers desire to align their beliefs to those of the leader.   Followers tend to assume greater risk.

The modus operandi of the leader who adopts the affiliate style of leadership is to: a. Create harmony and builds emotional bonds b. Forge consensus through participation c. Set high standards for performance d. Develop People for the Future

“Leaning in” as a leader means two things. One is to understand the needs of the followers and provide them with tools, environments, and opportunities that allow the team to be most effective. The second is to trust their team’s ability to conquer any challenges to reach the end goal. If the leader fails to lean in with the team, the whole organization would likely fail. Since the leader needs their followers to achieve any goals at all. The same applies for the follower as well. As a follower, the more you are able to lean in towards the leader. Let them know how you operate and what environment you work best in, it would be impossible for the leaders to create such an environment.   To effectively build connections with others, respect, would be the first step. Whether it’s leaders or followers. Respecting each other's opinions and valuing others’ perspectives is the best way to build a solid foundation to your connections. But to make a lasting connection, being yourself is the…

A common belief in management and leadership circles is that the most effective leaders do NOT adopt one style and stick with it, but rather they have the ability to adjust to the situation and/or the personnel when needed. How has a leader  shown the ability to use more than one style effectively?

Congruence is defined as achieving personal goals and values as a leader aligning interior beliefs and values with exterior actions and behaviors effectively communicating importance of personal values to others an act or process of merging strengths with leadership abilities