What does it mean to say that a person is risk averse?O A. The person has diminishing marginal utility of income and prefers a certain income to a gamble with the same expected income.ⒸB. The person has increasing marginal utility of income and prefers a certain income to a gamble with the same expected income.OC. The person has diminishing marginal utility of income and prefers an uncertain income to a certain income.O D. The person has increasing marginal utility of income and prefers an uncertain income to a certain income.Why are some people likely to be risk averse while others are risk lovers?ⒸA. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends only on the person's income. At low levels of income people are risk averse, but at high income they become risk loving.OB. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends on the nature of the risk involved, but it is independent of income.OC. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends on the nature of the risk involved and on the person's income.O D. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends only on the person's income. At low levels of income people are risk loving, but at high income they become risk averse.

'Risk' in economics offers the dynamic interplay of potential gains and unknowns. It serves as the…

What does it mean to say that a person is risk averse? O A. The person has diminishing marginal utility of income and prefers a certain income to a gamble with the same expected income. B. The person has increasing marginal utility of income and prefers a certain income to a gamble with the same expected income. O C. The person has diminishing marginal utility of income and prefers an uncertain income to a certain income. D. The person has increasing marginal utility of income and prefers an uncertain income to a certain income. Why are some people likely to be risk averse while others are risk lovers? A. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends only on the person's income. At low levels of income people are risk averse, but at high income they become risk loving. B. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends on the nature of the risk involved, but it is independent of income. C. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends on the nature of the risk involved and on the person's income. D. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends only on the person's income. At low levels of income people are risk loving, but at high income they become risk averse.

What does it mean to say that a person is risk averse? O A. The person has diminishing marginal utility of income and prefers a certain income to a gamble with the same expected income. B. The person has increasing marginal utility of income and prefers a certain income to a gamble with the same expected income. O C. The person has diminishing marginal utility of income and prefers an uncertain income to a certain income. D. The person has increasing marginal utility of income and prefers an uncertain income to a certain income. Why are some people likely to be risk averse while others are risk lovers? A. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends only on the person's income. At low levels of income people are risk averse, but at high income they become risk loving. B. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends on the nature of the risk involved, but it is independent of income. C. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends on the nature of the risk involved and on the person's income. D. A person's risk aversion (or risk loving) depends only on the person's income. At low levels of income people are risk loving, but at high income they become risk averse.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Your friend is contemplating buying a local restaurant. He has assessed the lifetime profits, including resale, to be $11 million with 20% chance, $6 million with 60% chance or $3 million with 20% chance. Knowing the most your friend would pay for the restaurant is $6.4 million, what can you infer about the situation? O A. The expected payoff of the restaurant is $6.333 million, the risk-discount being offered by your friend is $77.000 and your friend is risk averse with respect to this purchase. O B. The expected payoff of the restaurant is $6.4 million, the risk-premium being required by your friend $0 and your friend is risk neutral with respect to this purchase. o C. The expected payoff of the restaurant is $6.4 million, the risk-premium being required by your friend $200,000 and your friend is risk seeking with respect to this purchase. O D. The expected payoff of the restaurant is $6.333 million, the risk-premium being required by your friend is $333,000 and your friend is risk…
27 of 38 Larissa experiences a diminishing marginal utility of income. Because of this we know that Larissa's attitude toward risk is that of O A. risk neutral. O B. risk loving. O C. risk averse. O D. risk caring. Unsure
2. Maria has $100. There is a 50% that she will lose all of it. Her utility as a functionof wealth is u(c) = √c. a. What is the maximum amount she would be willing to pay to fully insure againstthe 50% probability of the loss? b. Is she risk averse, risk loving, or risk neutral?
. Explain the interpretation of a utility function and why such a function should be increasing. is said that the utility function of a decision maker is given by Ua(x) = 2ax – x², r € R for some a > 0.For which lotteries with random outcomes X is the above function a utility function? Explain your answer and give an example of a lottery or specify a distibution of the random variable X for which the function mentioned in relation 2 is not a utility function. 3. Consider a decision maker with initial wealth 0 and this decision maker needs to play a lottery L having a random outcome X bounded above by a > 0. This means P(X 0 be given and L a lotery with random outcome X having cumulative distribution function if r a and assume that the utility function of the decision maker having initial wealth w = 0 is given by the function uq listed in relation 2. Compute the expected utility of this lottery and the certainty equivalence of this lottery.
QUESTION 6 Paul is a risk loving decision maker, facing a lottery that yields either zero or 100 pounds with equal probabilities. A O a. Paul will agree to sell the lottery if and only if X> 100 Ob. Paul would never sell the lottery because he likes risk O. Paul may agree to sell the lottery for X 50
Q5
B's profit B invests B does not invest 100 80 100 -40 -40 10 80 10 Which of the following statements are correct? Select one or more: O a. If A invests, B's best strategy is to not invest since A will take all the profit O b. Whoever invests first gains a first-mover advantage O c. The co-ordination game exhibits two Nash equilibria. O d. If B chooses to not invest, A's best strategy is also to not invest. A's profit A does not invest A invests
2. Suppose you have no money of your own but luckily you participate in one contest. You have a utility for money as follows. U=y". You two options: Option 1: You get X liras for sure. Option 2: You get 144 liras 50 percent of the time and nothing 50 perctt of the time. a-) How much X should be in order for you to be indifferent between option 1 and option 2? Please show all your calculations b-) What is your Arrow-Pratt measure of absolute risk aversion? How does it change with y?
6 Consider Bob's utility function. a. What is Bob's expected value of a gamble with a 50% chance of $0 and a 50% chance of $100? 4 d b 30 50 75 100
p Consider the following lottery scenarios. Which of these is an example of the Allais Paradox, a well-known deviation from expected utility theory? O a. Lottery P offers a 1% chance of winning $10,000 and a 99% chance of winning nothing, while Lottery Q offers a 50% chance of winning $200 and a 50% chance of winning nothing. Even though the expected value of Lottery P is greater, most people choose Lottery Q because they overweight the low probability event in P. O b. Lottery M offers a 90% chance of winning $5,000,000 and a 10% chance of winning nothing, while Lottery N offers a 10% chance of winning $50,000,000 and a 90% chance of winning nothing. Despite Lottery N having a higher expected value, a majority of people choose Lottery M. Oc. Lottery X offers a 50% chance of winning $1,000 and a 50% chance of winning nothing, while Lottery Y offers a guaranteed win of $450. Despite the higher expected value of Lottery X ($500 vs $450), a majority of people choose Lottery Y. O d. Lottery…
When the second order derivative of a function is greater than zero than the agent is risk lover. question; Asses the risk attitude of an agent represented by the expected utility function u(x)= 2x2-5. However my course material writes that this agent is risk neutral because it is affine. My question is that whys is this so despite the fact that the second order derivative is '4' which is >0. Kindly explain this to me with complete steps.
An individual is oered a choice of either $50 or a lottery which may result in $0and $100, each with equal probability 1/2 . If the individual has a utility function u(w) = 5 + 2w, which one would they choose? If the individual has a utility function u(w) =w1/2 + 1?