Two players, Player 1 and Player 2, are playing a repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Payoffs are described in the following matrix. Answer which statement is correct: Select one: a. A trigger strategy will never support (A,A) as an equilibrium b. A tit-for-tat strategy will never support (A,A) as an equilibrium c. A tit-for-tat strategy will support (A,A) as an equilibrium if δ > 0.7 d. A trigger strategy will support (A,A) as an equilibrium if δ > 0.7

Two players, Player 1 and Player 2, are playing a repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Payoffs are described in the following matrix. Answer which statement is correct: Select one: a. A trigger strategy will never support (A,A) as an equilibrium b. A tit-for-tat strategy will never support (A,A) as an equilibrium c. A tit-for-tat strategy will support (A,A) as an equilibrium if δ > 0.7 d. A trigger strategy will support (A,A) as an equilibrium if δ > 0.7

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two discount stores (Megastore and Superstore) are interested in expanding their market share through advertising. The table below depicts the strategic outcomes (profits) of both stores with and without advertising. Superstore - Advertise Superstore - Don't Advertise Megastore - Advertise $95, $80 $305, $55 Megastore - Don't Advertise $65, $285 $165, $115 When the game does reach Nash Equilibrium, the payoffs for both stores will be a) Megastore $95 and Superstore $80 b) Megastore $305 and Superstore $55 c) Megastore $65 and Superstore $285 d) Megastore $165 and Superstore $115
A "Prisoner's Dilemma" is a situation in which both parties: a) have an incentive to cooperate(meaning working with the other criminal by keeping one's mouth shut) even without communication b) have an incentive to not cooperate(meaning working with other criminal by keeping one's mouth shut) even through cooperation would be mutually benefical. c)have no incentives to cooperate or not cooperate because either way they lose.
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium?
Use a matrix to model a two-player game of rock-paper-scissors with payoff of 1 if you win, -1 if you lose, and 0 if you tie. In this game, how many pure-strategies Nash equilibria exist?
Olivia is thinking about opening a new bakery (the entrant). There is already a bakery open in her neighborhood (the incumbent), and the owner of the incumbent bakery makes it clear that if Olivia enters the market, they will cut their prices in an attempt to drive the new bakery out of business. Based on the payoff matrix below, is the incumbent’s threat credible? That is, if Olivia opens a new bakery, will the incumbent actually lower their prices? Note: the entrant chooses the row, the incumbent chooses the column High price Low price Enter 1, 2 -1, 1 Don’t enter 0, 10 0, 1 a. Yes, the threat is credible b. No, the threat is not credible
Consider a simple example of a payoff matrix in the context of a trade dispute between two countries, Country A and Country B. In this scenario, both countries can either choose to impose tariffs (T) or not impose tariffs (N) on each other's exports. The payoffs that each country experiences are based on the chosen strategies and are presented below. (a) Does Country A and B have a dominant strategy? If so, specify its dominant strategy and explain your answer clearly.(b) What is the Nash equilibrium. Explain your answer clearly.(c) Suppose now the trade dispute is played sequentially, with Country B moving first. Represent the trade dispute in and extensive form.(d) Is this trade dispute a prisoner's dilemma game? Explain your answer.
Consider a simultaneous move game with two players. Player 1 has three possible actions (A, B, or C) and Player 2 has two possible actions (D or E.) In the payoff matrix below, each cell contains the payoff for Player 1 followed by the payoff for Player 2. Identify any dominated strategies in this game. If there are none, state this clearly.
Consider a simultaneous game where player A has a dominant strategy and player B has two strategies (none of which is a dominant strategy). How many pure strategy Nash equilibria will this game have? A) Exactly 1 B) Exactly 2 C) Either 1 or 2 D) None
Consider the following static, single-shot game played between two cyclists, Chico and Loco, who find themselves riding towards each other down a narrow lane. Chico wants to pass by safely, and he can only do this by cycling on the opposite side of the lane to Loco. So, he has two options: to cycle on the Right of the lane, or to cycle on the Left. Loco meanwhile is having a bad day and wants to crash into Chico, and the way he can achieve this is by cycling on the same side of the lane as Chico. So again, he has two options: to cycle on the Right of the lane, or to cycle on the Left. He does not care at all about hurting himself if they collide. (c) By constructing the best response lines of both players, identify all Nash equilibrium outcomes in the above game i.e., in pure and mixed strategies. (d) Provide an intuitive interpretation of the equilibrium outcome(s) identified in part (c) above.
Problem 4: Consider an infinitely repeated game, where the base game is the following 2-person 2x2 game: A A 0,0 10, 10 S1: choose A always S2: choose B always B 10, 10 0,0 Assume both players discount the future at the same rate of r, 0 < r < 1. Limiting each player's strategies to the following six possibilities, S3: Choose A then mimic the other player's previous choice S4: Choose B, then mimic the other player's previous choice S5: Choose A, then choose the opposite of the other player's previous choice S6: Choose B, then choose the opposite of the other player's previous choice a. present the strategic form of this game, b. identify all pure-strategy Nash equilibria c. does repetition with these strategies "solve" the coordination dilemma that confronts the players in the single play of the above game.
Which of the following outcomes could not occur in a game with two layers who each have two available strategies? A game where one player has two dominant strategies. A game where only one player has a dominant strategy A game where neither player has a dominant strategy. All of these are possible A game where the combined payoff for the two players is the same with every possible combination of strategies.
In penalty shoot-outs, the Nash Equilibrium strategies of goalies and players depend on how important the game is. In more important games, the Nash Equilibrium will favor low-risk strategies since players are risk-averse. True False