Rewrite this text;
The Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) is a policy implemented in certain areas to reduce air pollution by charging vehicles that do not meet specific emission standards. To provide a summary of the main changes brought in by ULEZ, I will refer to the information from the BBC News article and the research briefing from the UK Parliament's Commons Library.
According to the BBC News article, the ULEZ policy was introduced in London in April 2019 and expanded in October 2021. The main change brought by ULEZ is the requirement for vehicles entering the zone to meet strict emission standards. Petrol vehicles must meet Euro 4 standards, while diesel vehicles must meet Euro 6 standards. Non-compliant vehicles are subject to a daily charge. The ULEZ policy aims to improve air quality and reduce harmful emissions, particularly nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter.
One potential benefit expected to arise from the introduction of ULEZ is the improvement in air quality. The Commons Library research briefing highlights that ULEZ has led to a significant reduction in nitrogen dioxide levels in central London. This benefit is related to both equity and efficiency concerns. From an equity perspective, improved air quality can have a positive impact on public health, benefiting all individuals, especially those vulnerable to respiratory issues. From an efficiency perspective, reduced air pollution can lead to lower healthcare costs and increased productivity due to improved overall health.
However, there are also potential costs associated with the introduction of ULEZ. The BBC News article mentions that some critics argue that ULEZ disproportionately affects low-income individuals who may own older, non-compliant vehicles. This cost is related to equity concerns. The Commons Library research briefing further explains that the cost of upgrading vehicles to meet the emission standards can be a burden for individuals with limited financial resources. This highlights the potential equity implications of the ULEZ policy, as it may place a disproportionate burden on certain socio-economic groups.
In summary, the main changes brought in by ULEZ include the requirement for vehicles to meet strict emission standards and the introduction of daily charges for non-compliant vehicles. One potential benefit of ULEZ is the improvement in air quality, which addresses both equity and efficiency concerns. However, there are also potential costs associated with the policy, particularly related to equity concerns, as it may disproportionately affect low-income individuals. It is important to consider both the benefits and costs when evaluating the impact of ULEZ.
Step by stepSolved in 4 steps
- Which of the following market failures does a carbon tax most explicitly try to address? Select one: a. monopolies b. lack of consumer information C. externalities d. corrupt politiciansarrow_forwardNo hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph. As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant. What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.arrow_forward2arrow_forward
- MAC_1 = 11 - 2E 1 MAC 2 = 8.5 E_2, and assume marginal external damages ( MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg E_1 + E_2) is: MED = .5 E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per- unit tax on emissions. With this tax, the total amount of tax revenue raised is $ =arrow_forward1arrow_forward[4] At their choice of emissions after trading permits, what is each firm’s total abatement cost? Firm 1’s Total Abatement Cost ___________ Firm 2’s Total Abatement Cost ___________ [5] Alternatively, what could the regulator choose for an emissions tax to achieve the goal of 25 units in a cost-effective manner?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education