In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of the test was x1 = 368.4, with sample standard deviation s1 = 39.1. The average score on the vocabulary portion of the test for the n2 = 30 subjects in the control group was x2 = 349.0with sample standard deviation s2 = 56.2. Use a 1% level of significance to test the claim that the experimental group performed better than the control group. (a) What is the level of significance?   What is the value of the sample test statistic? (Test the difference μ1 − μ2. Round your answer to three decimal places.)

In a survey of working parents (both parents working), one of the questions asked was "Have you refused a job, promotion, or transfer because it would mean less time with your family?" 410410 men and 410410 women were asked this question. 26%26% of the men and 19%19% of the women responded "Yes". Based on this survey, can it be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of men ( p1p1 ) and women ( p2p2 ) responding "Yes"? Use a significance level of α=0.05α=0.05 for the test. Step 3 of 5 :   Compute the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two decimal places.

A​ case-control (or​ retrospective) study was conducted to investigate a relationship between the colors of helmets worn by motorcycle drivers and whether they are injured or killed in a crash. Results are given in the accompanying table. Using a 0.05 significance​ level, test the claim that injuries are independent of helmet color.                        Black; White; Yellow; Red; Blue Controls (not injured) 500; 355; 32; 173; 79 Cases (injured or killed) 220; 115; 9; 71; 38

Does training in a memory program affect memory for spontaneously observed events? A researcher arranged to train four volunteers in a memory program and four other volunteers served as controls. A week later, as part of their psychology class, all eight volunteers watched a film showing a bank robbery. Afterward they were questioned about the events. The number of accurate responses for the participants who had taken the memory course were 20, 25, 24, and 23. The number of correct responses for the control group participants were 14, 22, 18, and 17. Do these results support the contention that those trained in this particular memory program are more accurate at recall for spontaneously observed events? (Use a =.05.) a. Use the four steps of hypothesis testing. b. Calculate Eta squared

How would you find (a.) and (b.)?? As well as finding the test statistic and p-value?

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of the test was x1 = 368.4, with sample standard deviation s1 = 39.1. The average score on the vocabulary portion of the test for the n2 = 30 subjects in the control group was x2 = 349.0with sample standard deviation s2 = 56.2. Use a 1% level of significance to test the claim that the experimental group performed better than the control group. (a) What is the level of significance?   (b)What is the value of the sample test statistic? (Test the difference μ1 − μ2. Round your answer to three decimal places.)

A professor wanted to determine if the GPAS of students at Saddleback College are less consistent than the GPAS of students at Irvine Valley College. To test this, he obtains random samples of students from both colleges and records their GPAS, which are given below. Test the professor's claim at the a=0.05 level of significance. Saddleback College Irvine Valley College 3.7 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.7 3.6 4.0 3.4 3.8 3.2 3.0 2.5 3.6 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.1 2.7 3.9 3.4 2.0 2.2 2.7 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 3.8 3.1 2.9 3.2 2.8 Calculator Function [ Select] [ Select] 2-PropZTest ANOVA X^2-Test T-Test 2-SampTTest 2-SampFTest [ Select] v sufficient evidence that the standard deviation of grades for Saddleback College students is [ Select] than the standard deviation for Irvine Valley College students.

A Michigan study concerning preference for outdoor activities used a questionnaire with a six-point Likert-type response in which 1 designated "not important" and 6 designated "extremely important." A random sample of n1 = 41 adults were asked about fishing as an outdoor activity. The mean response was x1 = 4.9. Another random sample of n2 = 50 adults were asked about camping as an outdoor activity. For this group, the mean response was x2 = 5.7. From previous studies, it is known that ?1 = 1.6 and ?2 = 1.5. Does this indicate a difference (either way) regarding preference for camping versus preference for fishing as an outdoor activity? Use a 5% level of significance.Note: A Likert scale usually has to do with approval of or agreement with a statement in a questionnaire. For example, respondents are asked to indicate whether they "strongly agree," "agree," "disagree," or "strongly disagree" with the statement. (a) What is the level of significance? .05   State the null and alternate…

Which of these experiments sounds the most like it would be analyzed with an Independent-Samples t-test? A. A study that gives patients a placebo on Monday and measures their pain, then has them back on Friday and gives them a real pain pill and measures their pain   B. A study that compares tennis players vs. football players on their peak heart rate while playing their sports   C.A study that looks at the attention span of a group of n=30 5-year-olds and then follows up with those same kids when they are 10-years-old   D. A study that measures the knowledge of the transfer process for a group of Chaffey students, both before and after they attend an orientation