ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Please help with these two:
1. Consider a Duopoly model, in which two firms decide a quantity simultaneously. If they collude (setting the total quantity together), then each firm can earn (higher, or lower) profit than in the Cournot equilibrium.
2. Consider a collusion with two firms. The joint profit is maximized by setting quantity and price together. Each firm sells the agreed amount. However, believing that the other firm sells the agreed amount, there is always a temptation for the firm sell (more, or less) than the agreed amount.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies split the market and earn $60 million each. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $20 million since each company must bear the cost of advertising. Yet, if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. In this case, the company that advertises earns $70 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million. What will these two companies do if they behave as individual profit maximizers? One company will advertise, and the other will not. Brown Inc. earns $70. Both companies will advertise. PM Inc. earns $60. Neither company will advertise. Brown Inc. earns $60. Both companies will advertise. Brown Inc. earns $40.arrow_forwardWhich of the following best represents the pricing behavior of firms in an oligopolistic market? A) Stay*Put Clothespins takes the market price of clothespins as given and produces the amount of clothespins where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. B) Unykdrugs, Inc. produces where its marginal revenue is equal to its marginal cost and prices on its downward-sloping demand curve such that the market for its product clears, knowing it will not face competition due to patents it holds on its products. C) Teen Angle Hardware looks for a niche to sell its hardware products to teens but finds it difficult to earn anything more than normal profit due to other hardware stores also looking for niches. D) Looking Over Your Shoulder Handbag Co. chooses the price it charges by estimating what its rivals are most likely to do and then taking their responses into consideration.arrow_forwardA Cournot Oligopoly (duopoly) exists where the market demand function facing each of the two firms is P = 4 - (Q1 + Q2) , where Q = (Q1 + Q2) and the MC facing each firm is zero. If the two firms form a cartel, what is the market quantity (Q) and market price (P) that will prevail? 4/3, 4/3 3,1 1,3 2,2arrow_forward
- If Gulfstream and Bombardier, both producers of upscale jet airplanes, were to collude rather than compete, consumers could expect: Group of answer choices A) higher prices and higher quantities offered for sale. B) higher prices and lower quantities offered for sale. C) one firm to emerge as the price leader in the oligopoly. D) lower prices and lower quantities offered for sale. E) each firm to cheat on the cartel agreement.arrow_forward2. Deviating from the collusive outcome Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.80 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 2.00 1.80 Monopoly Outcome 1.60 Demand 1.40 1.20 1.00 MC = ATC 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 MR 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) PRICE (Dollars per can)arrow_forwardConsider the following Cournot Duopoly diagram... Firm 1 Reaction Function r₁ A 6 C 0 E no Isoprofit curves for firm 1 Firm 2 Reaction Function 1₂ At what point is the Cournot equilibrium achieved? Q₁arrow_forward
- Consider a COURNOT duopoly. Market demand is P(Q)=14-Q, and each firm faces a marginal cost of $1 per unit, no FC. If firms cooperate and divide the profit between each other, how much is each firm's profit?arrow_forwardQuestion 1 Suppose the romaine lettuce industry is a Cournot duopoly with the following two firms: Amalgamated Romaine (a) and Best Romaine (b). The (inverse) market demand schedule is: p = 262 -0.5Q Amalgamated Romaine has the following cost structure: MCATC₁ = $6 Best Romaine has a different cost structure: MC₁ = ATC₁ = $8 Find the following in Cournot-Nash equilibrium. a. Output of Amalgamated Romaine = b. Output of Best Romaine = c. Cournot duopoly equilibrium price = $ units units 3 ptsarrow_forwardMays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.80 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. 2.00 1.80 Monopoly Outcome 1.60 Demand 1.40 1.20 1.00 MC = ATC 0.80 P 0.60 0.40 0.20 MR 70 140 210 280 350 420 490 560 630 700 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) PRICE (Dollars per can) ---arrow_forward
- 2. Four firms (A, B, C, and D) play a pricing game (i.e. Bertrand). Each firm (i) may choose any price Pi from 0 to ¥, with the goal of maximizing its own profit. Firms A and B have MC = 10, while firms C and D have MC = 20. The firms serve a market with the demand curve Q = 100 – P. All firms produce exactly the same product, so consumers purchase only from the firm with the lowest price. If multiple firms have the same low price, consumers divide their quantities evenly among the low-priced firms. Assume the firms choose price simultaneously. a. There are many equilibria in this simultaneous-move pricing game. Provide one equilibrium combination of prices, and argue that no firm has a unilateral incentive to deviate from these prices. Now assume firm A chooses price first. Firm B observes this choice and then chooses its own price second. Firm C chooses price third, and firm D chooses price last. b. Again, there are many equilibria in this sequential-move pricing game.…arrow_forwardDuopoly: 1. Consider a duopoly game with 2 firms. The market inverse demand curve is given by P(Q) = 120-Q, where Q = 9₁ +9₂ and q; is the quantity produced by firm i. The firm's long run total costs are given by C₁(9₁)=2q₁ and C₂(92)=92, respectively. a. Determine the Nash Equilibrium for Cournot competition, in which firms compete based on quantity. What is each firm's best response as a function of the other firm's output? Graph these best response functions in on the same graph. Compute the associated payoffs for each firm. b. Determine the Nash Equilibrium for Bertrand competition, in which firms compete based on price and stand ready to meet market demand at that price. What is each firm's best response as a function of the other firm's price? Graph these best response functions in on the same graph. Compute the associated payoffs for each firm. Game Tharrow_forwardSuppose Canon raised the price of its printers, but Hewlett-Packard (the largest seller) refused to follow. Two years later, Canon cut its price, and Hewlett-Packard retaliated with an even deeper price cut, which Canon was forced to match. For the next five years, Hewlett- Packard raised its prices five times, and each time, Canon followed suit within 24 hours. The model underlying the pricing behavior of these firms is the: Cartel model O Perfect competition model Nonprice competition model Price leadership modelarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education