Fig. 1. optix determines wing scale color identity and morphology in H. erato and A. vanillae. (A) optix mosaic knockouts in H. erato result in con- version of red ommochrome color patterns to black melanin. The compari sons shown are left-right asymmetrical knockout effects from single individual injected butterflies. (B) Detail of mutant clone highlighted in the mutant in A showing red replaced by black in a proximal red "dennis" pattern of the dorsal forewing. (C-C") optix knockout mosaics showing transformation of pointed wing conjugation scales to normal wing scales. Each panel in the series shows successive detail. (D) optix replaces orange and brown ommochromes in A. vanillae with melanins, resulting in a black and silver butterfly. Arrows highlight presumptive done boundaries dis cussed in the text. (E) Detail of a knockout clone boundary highlighting the switch between red and black pigmentation in the ventral forewing from D. (F) Ventral view of black spots in optix knockout mutant showing a phe- notype similar to WT. (G and G) Wing conjugation scales in WT (G) and optix knockout mutant (G) demonstrating a role for optix in determining A. vanillae scale morphology. replaced by black pigments. These results show that optix is re- quired for red color pattern specification in H. erato, and acts as a coordinating "or" switch between ommochrome (orange and red) and melanin (black and gray) pigment types. To test whether optix has a role in color patterning in a more basal heliconiine butterfly, we generated knockouts in the gulf fritillary A. vanillae (Fig. 1 D-F, Fig. S1, and Dataset S1, Tables S1 and S2). Previous in situ hybridization work in A. vanillae suggested that optix is not expressed in association with ommo- chrome patterns during early pupal development, leading to the hypothesis that the gene might not play a major color patterning role in this species (14). Thus, we were surprised to find that optix knockout resulted in a complete transformation of ommo- chrome scales to black melanin scales, producing a very unusual and the complete ommochrome-to-melanin switch consistently oc- curred in dorsal wings (Fig. 2A and B), but much of the ventral wing area showed only a loss of ommochrome and little obvious hypermelanization (Fig. 2 A, C, and D). Importantly, however, we recovered late-stage pupal wings from V. cardui that had died before emergence that displayed hypermelanization of ventral wing surfaces (Fig. 3E). We speculate that this variable strength of ventral wing pattern melanization among individuals may re- flect a dosage effect, with the stronger phenotypes representing biallelic optix deletion clones. We have no direct evidence for this, however, given the challenges in rigorously characterizing specific alleles from individual mutant clones (16). We also re- covered hypermelanic optix knockout pupae in both V. cardui (Fig. S2) and J. coenia (Fig. S3). Taken together, our knockout data from four nymphalids clearly demonstrate that optix plays a conserved role in coordinating the color identities of butterfly wing scales, where it operates as an "or" function between ommochrome and melanin identities, but also may be modulated to serve as an "and" function in some contexts, as demonstrated by phenotypes seen in the ventral wings of V. cardui. optix Function Is Required for Determination of Derived Scale Structures. Along with its expression in color patterns, in situ optix expression also precisely predicts the location of patches of derived, pointed scales thought to play a role in conjugating forewings and hindwings during flight (5, 14). To determine whether optix plays a role in determining the unusual morphology of these scales, we examined optix knockouts for changes in wing scale structure. Indeed, we found that in all four species, optix knockout resulted in trans- formation of wing conjugation scales to normal wing scales (Figs. 1 C and G, 2F, and 3F). Furthermore, in H. erato, A. vanillae, and V. cardui, where wing conjugation scales display color pigmentation, we observed both structural and pigmentation changes in the same scales, suggesting that optix can coregulate both scale morphology and pigmentation simultaneously. One final observation of note relates to the optix-expressing pheroscales that occur along the veins of male A. vanillae (14). These scales did not show any grossly ap- parent transformation in optix knockouts (data not shown), even though the scales occurred within obvious knockout clones. Therefore, whether optix plays a functional role in the development of pheroscales, as was predicted previously (14), remains an open question. In sum, our observations that optix knockout results in transformation of wing conjugation scales to normal wing scales replaced by black pigments. These results show that optix is re- quired for red color pattern specification in H. erato, and acts as a coordinating "or" switch between ommochrome (orange and red) and melanin (black and gray) pigment types. To test whether optix has a role in color patterning in a more basal heliconiine butterfly, we generated knockouts in the gulf fritillary A. vanillae (Fig. 1 D-F, Fig. S1, and Dataset S1, Tables S1 and S2). Previous in situ hybridization work in A. vanillae suggested that optix is not expressed in association with ommo- chrome patterns during early pupal development, leading to the hypothesis that the gene might not play a major color patterning role in this species (14). Thus, we were surprised to find that optix knockout resulted in a complete transformation of ommo- chrome scales to black melanin scales, producing a very unusual and dramatic phenotype of a completely black and silver butterfly (Fig. 1D). We also observed a handful of orange or brown scales that changed to silver patches (Fig. 1D, ventral forewing, green arrows), although we cannot confidently conclude that these are cell- autonomous knockout effects since it has been shown that silver scales can be induced through long-range signaling (18, 19), in this case potentially from neighboring knockout clones. The wild-type (WT) black spots and marginal bands in the ventral forewing were unaffected in knockouts and remained a darker color relative to the neighboring mutant melanic scales (Fig. 1F). optix knockout also resulted in melanic hyperpigmentation in adult bodies (Fig. S1A). Thus, our results in A. vanillae are consistent with those in H. erato in supporting a role for optix as a switch-like regulator that toggles between ommochrome and melanin patterns. We next aimed to test whether optix regulates wing patterning in more distantly related lineages by performing knockouts in the nymphalines V. cardui (Fig. 2, Fig. S2, and Dataset S1, Tables S1 and S2) and J. coenia (Fig. 3, Fig. S3, and Dataset S1, Tables S1 and S2), which diverged from heliconiines by ~75-80 mya (20, 21). Our results were consistent with those from H. erato and A. vanillae, where optix knockouts in both species showed mutant clones with complete loss of presumptive ommochrome pig- ments and replacement by melanins (Figs. 2 A-E and 3 A-C). One interesting exception to this finding was in V. cardui, where 10708 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1709058114 C and G, 2F, and 3F). Furthermore, in H. erato, A. vanillae, and V. cardui, where wing conjugation scales display color pigmentation, we observed both structural and pigmentation changes in the same scales, suggesting that optix can coregulate both scale morphology and pigmentation simultaneously. One final observation of note relates to the optix-expressing pheroscales that occur along the veins of male A. vanillae (14). These scales did not show any grossly ap- parent transformation in optix knockouts (data not shown), even though the scales occurred within obvious knockout clones. Therefore, whether optix plays a functional role in the development of pheroscales, as was predicted previously (14), remains an open question. In sum, our observations that optix knockout results in transformation of wing conjugation scales to normal wing scales V. V. cordu Fig. 2. optix determines wing scale color identity and morphology in V. cardui. (A) optix knockout mutant showing loss of ommochrome pigments. (B-D) Left-right asymmetrical comparisons from individual optix mutant but terflies, showing melanization of red patterns (8), loss of color pigmentation without widespread hypermelanization in the ventral forewing (C) and hindwing (D). (E) Severe defects in late stage pupal wings displaying hypermelanization in red regions of dorsal and ventral wing surfaces (green and purple arrowheads) compared with mosaic adult mutants in A. (F) optix knockout showing con version of pointed wing conjugation scales to normal scales. Zhang et al.

Equalizing the Expression of X Chromosome Genes in Males and Females Individuals with an XXY genotype are sterile males. If one X is inactivated early in embryogenesis, the genotype of the individual effectively becomes XY. Why will this individual not develop as a normal male?

Why is it more efficient to perform a test cross with a homozygous recessive donor than a homozygous dominant donor? How could the same information still he found with a homozygous dominant donor?

Familial retinoblastoma, a rare autosomal dominant defect, arose in a large family that had no prior history of the disease. Consider the following pedigree (the darkly colored symbols represent affected individuals): a. Circle the individual(s) in which the mutation most likely occurred. b. Is the person who is the source of the mutation affected by retinoblastoma? Justify your answer. c. Assuming that the mutant allele is fully penetrant, what is the chance that an affected individual will have an affected child?

The gene for flower position in pea plants exists as axial or terminal alleles. Given that axial is dominant to terminal, list all of the possible F1 and F2 genotypes and phenotypes from a cross involving parents that are homozygous for each trait. Express genotypes with conventional genetic abbreviations.

The cystic fibrosis gene encodes a chloride channel protein necessary for normal cellular functions. Let us assume that if at least 5% normal channels are present, the affected individual has mild symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Having less than 5% normal channels produces severe symptoms. At least 50% of the channels must be expressed for the individual to be phenotypically normal. This gene has various mutant recessive alleles: Predict the percent of functional channels and severity of symptoms for the following genotypes: a. heterozygous for CF100 b. homozygous for CF100 c. heterozygous, with one copy of CF100 and one of CF3 d. heterozygous, with one copy of CF1 and one copy of CF3

13. Suppose a biotechnology company has developed a GMO, a transgenic plant that expresses Bt toxin. The company sells its seeds to a farmer under the condition that the farmer may plant the seed, but not collect seed from the plants that grow and use it to produce crops in the subsequent season. The seeds are expensive, and the farmer buys seeds from the company only once. How could the company show experimentally that the farmer has violated the agreement and is using seeds collected from the first crop to grow the next crop?

How would you perform a reciprocal cross for the characteristic of stem height in the garden pea?

Explain why it was essential that Mendel perform his crosses using a large sample size?

Why would an individual with a mutation that prevented the formation of recombination nodules be considered less fit than other members of its species?