The Abercrombie & Fitch Religious Discrimination Case
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 2015 case involving Abercrombie & Fitch, ruled that that “an employer may not refuse to hire an applicant for work if the employer was motivated by avoiding the need to accommodate a religious practice,” and that doing so violates the prohibition against religious discrimination contained in the CRA of 1964, Title VII. According to the EEOC general counsel David Lopez, “This case is about defending the American principles of religious freedom and tolerance. This decision is a victory for our increasingly diverse society.”22
The case arose when, as part of her Muslim faith, a teenage girl named Samantha Elauf wore a hijab (headscarf) to a job interview with Abercrombie & Fitch. Elauf was denied a job because she did not conform to the company’s “Look Policy,” which Abercrombie claimed banned head coverings. Elauf filed a complaint with the EEOC alleging religious discrimination, and the EEOC, in turn, filed suit against Abercrombie & Fitch, alleging it refused to hire Elauf because of her religious beliefs and failed to accommodate her by making an exception to its “Look Policy.”
“I was a teenager who loved fashion and was eager to work for Abercrombie & Fitch,” said Elauf. “Observance of my faith should not have prevented me from getting a job. I am glad that I stood up for my rights, and happy that the EEOC was there for me and took my complaint to the courts. I am grateful to the Supreme Court for the decision and hope that other people realize that this type of discrimination is wrong and the EEOC is there to help.”23
Critical Thinking
- Does a retail clothing store have an interest in employee appearance that it can justify in terms of customer sales?
- Does it matter to you what a sales associate looks like when you shop for clothes? Why or why not?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
- Describe the duty of fair representation.arrow_forwardLisa applied and interviewed for a manager position at her company and was not selected. She was not given any feedback from the interview, Tony her male coworker was selected for the position. Lisa felt the promotion was unfair, since she had more seniority than Tony, and decided to file a gender discrimination and play with her local equal opportunity commissioner the EEOC investigated the complaint, and did not find any evidence of discrimination. Both Lisa and Tony’s employment was in good standing however, Tony had passed managerial experience, which was listed as a requirement on the job. This aspect, then made him a strong, stronger candidate for the job than Lisa, who had more seniority, but lacked the experience and the next several months, Lisa noticed the change from her manager prior to the complaint being filled he was very personable towards her and often made small talk around the office. After the complaint he was very short with her, and did not engage in any small…arrow_forwardCharter of Rights and Freedoms In 1988, the federal government introduced a legislation, Tobacco Products Control Act, created in complete and total prohibition on all advertising and promotion of tobacco products in Canada. The act also required a health warning of a specific nature to be put on tobacco packaging and prohibited the manufacturers from putting any other information on those packages. The manufacturer challenged the legislation before the Supreme Court claiming that it interfered with the manufacturer’s right to freedom of expression section 2 (b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 1) Do Supreme Court has legal right to interpret the legislated law? 2) Does law infringe the freedom of expression of the charter? Please state your reasons.arrow_forward
- The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…arrow_forwardWorld Color operated a printing plant. a written policy stated: “Baseball caps are prohibited except for [world Color] baseball caps.” The policy permitted employees to accessorize their uniforms “in good taste and in accordance with all safety rules.” The Graphic Communications Conference of the international Brotherhood of Teamsters filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB claiming that the policy prohibited employees from wearing union insignia at work. it said world Color was interfering with its employees’ “right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, . . . and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining” as guaranteed by federal law. The NLRB agreed and world Color appealed. Was the baseball cap policy an unfair labor practice?arrow_forwardCarla is a police officer and a first-generation immigrant. She was assigned to work at a local casino. Carla liked the work and suggested to her brother (in her country of origin) that he come to the United States and work with her to learn English more fluently. The casino rejected his application because of his choppy English. How would you analyze the Immigration Reform and Control Act regarding the casino not hiring Carla's brother because of his choppy English?arrow_forward
- When some 250 IT workers at Walt Disney Parks and Resorts were laid off in 2015, a condition of their severance pay required some of them to train their replacements—workers from India who were in the United States on H-1B visas. Two of the displaced workers filed class action suits claiming that HCL and Cognizant Technology Solutions colluded with Disney to make false statements on certain forms when petitioning for workers to receive H-1B status. The suit alleged that those false statements were violations of the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. HCL and Cognizant are consulting firms that import workers to the United States on H-1B visas and then contract them out to U.S. firms. HCL is an India-based IT services company with 116,000 employees and annual revenue of $7 billion. Cognizant is a U.S.-based professional services company with annual revenue of $13 billion and over 260,000 employees (75 percent of whom are employed in India). The Immigration…arrow_forwardFollowing the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe, what rights do women have under theU.S. Constitution to determine whether to terminate their pregnancy? Explain your answerin detailarrow_forwardWhen some 250 IT workers at Walt Disney Parks and Resorts were laid off in 2015, a condition of their severance pay required some of them to train their replacements—workers from India who were in the United States on H-1B visas. Two of the displaced workers filed class action suits claiming that HCL and Cognizant Technology Solutions colluded with Disney to make false statements on certain forms when petitioning for workers to receive H-1B status. The suit alleged that those false statements were violations of the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. HCL and Cognizant are consulting firms that import workers to the United States on H-1B visas and then contract them out to U.S. firms. HCL is an India-based IT services company with 116,000 employees and annual revenue of $7 billion. Cognizant is a U.S.-based professional services company with annual revenue of $13 billion and over 260,000 employees (75 percent of whom are employed in India). The Immigration…arrow_forward
- Title VII requires that employers make reasonable accommodations for employees' OR applicants' religious beliefs that do not cause undue hardship. how frequent do you think requests for religious accommodations are?arrow_forwardPrivate law makes up the vast majority of environmental law in Canada. Choose one: True or Falsearrow_forwardIf a restaurant ignores health codes in violation of local, state, or federal environmental regulations, the resulting dispute focuses on law. public private consensual established preferentialarrow_forward
- Principles Of MarketingMarketingISBN:9780134492513Author:Kotler, Philip, Armstrong, Gary (gary M.)Publisher:Pearson Higher Education,MarketingMarketingISBN:9781259924040Author:Roger A. Kerin, Steven W. HartleyPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFoundations of Business (MindTap Course List)MarketingISBN:9781337386920Author:William M. Pride, Robert J. Hughes, Jack R. KapoorPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Marketing: An Introduction (13th Edition)MarketingISBN:9780134149530Author:Gary Armstrong, Philip KotlerPublisher:PEARSONContemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage Learning