5. The Rocky Mashed Potato Factory produces output at costs C= Q² (marginal costs 2Q), where Q is the quantity of mashed potatoes produced, in tons. In addition, 2 units of emissions are produced for each ton of mashed potatoes (E = 2Q). Pollution damage is $2 for each unit of emissions, which leads the government to charge $2 per unit of emissions as a Pigovian fee. The firm's output sells competitively for $10 per ton. a. How many tons of mashed potatoes will the Rocky Mashed Potato Factory pro- duce? How much does it pay in emission fees? What are its profits? b. A device is invented that would reduce the firm's emissions to one unit for each ton of output (E-OUHL such would the firm be willing to for such a device?

5. The Rocky Mashed Potato Factory produces output at costs C= Q² (marginal costs 2Q), where Q is the quantity of mashed potatoes produced, in tons. In addition, 2 units of emissions are produced for each ton of mashed potatoes (E = 2Q). Pollution damage is $2 for each unit of emissions, which leads the government to charge $2 per unit of emissions as a Pigovian fee. The firm's output sells competitively for $10 per ton. a. How many tons of mashed potatoes will the Rocky Mashed Potato Factory pro- duce? How much does it pay in emission fees? What are its profits? b. A device is invented that would reduce the firm's emissions to one unit for each ton of output (E-OUHL such would the firm be willing to for such a device?

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter17: Externalities And The Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10PAE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 24 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 12 – E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $2. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $_____. Select one: a. $19. b. $15. c. $16. d. $21. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $6. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $_____. HINT: Total costs include tax payments, total abatement costs, and (if relevant) adoption costs for the new technology. Select one: a. $12. b. $8. c. $10. d. $16.
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 150 – 6E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 75 – 3E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $12 to $24, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $_. Select one: a. $6. b. $24. c. $12. d. $36.
Problems Section 1. Marginal Abatement Cost Curves There are two coal plants that generate electricity, firm 1 and firm 2 that emit 100 and 200 tons of CO2 each year respectively when the price of pollution is zero (i.e., in the absence of any regulation). You are the head of the EPA, and after consulting with some environmental economists, you decide that the socially optimal amount of abatement in the electricity industry is a 100 tons of CO2. The marginal abatement cost curves are given by the following, where Qjand Q, are the amount of firm 1 and 2's abatement: MAC1 = 10+ (1/2)Q1 MAC2 = Q2 horizontal axis) %3D [hint: recall that in a MAC diagram, Q2 increases as you move to the left on the a. Historically, the EPA has used "command-and-control" methods of reducing pollution. One of your staff members, Mike, says that it is efficient for both firms to each reduce their pollution by 50 tons. Determine if you agree or disagree with Mike, and explain your intuition. b. In a cap and…
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 200 - 10E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 100 - SE. With a tax on emissions of $20, the benefits of adopting the new technologies equal: Select one: a. $30. b. $20. c. $25. d. $50.
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 100 – 2E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 50 – E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $4 to $12, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____
Imagine a firm’s marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 12 – E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 6 – 0.5E. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $3, the benefits of adopting the new technologies increase by $____.Select one:a. $8.b. $4.50.c. $5.d. $2.50.
A city currently emits 16 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. The table below shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits. Emissions Total Cost Marginal Cost Total Benefit Marginal Benefit 16 MG Current N/A Current N/A 12 MG 50 800 8 MG 150 1300 4 MG 500 1650 0 MG 1200 1950 Complete the table. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?
With transferrable emissions permits, firms must have permits to generate emissions. If a firm emits less pollution than its permits allow, it can sell its leftover permits to another firm that wishes to emit more pollutions than its permits allow. Comment on the following: “These permits have the advantages of both standards and fees, therefore, they may be the best technique of controlling pollution.” (Hint: How do transferrable emissions permits reflect on each firm’s individual abatement costs?)
Consider the following graph that shows the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve for a coal power plan for reducing local air pollution and the marginal damage (MD) curve for those living around the coal power plant. MD (E) MAC (E b. Emissions E-0 E EL E-Max AMax Or Abatement E A-0 What are the total abatement costs at E' (enter your answer with the letters and "+" signs as "a+b+c+d+e+f", without the quotation marks. What are the total abatement costs at E-0 (enter your answer with the letters and "+" signs as as "a+b+c+d+c+f", without the quotation marks. If the property rights were with the coal power plant how much Emissions would we see? (enter one of the following, "E-0", "E", "E1", "E-Max") If the property rights were with the people how much Emissions would we see? (enter one of the following. "E-0", "E", "E1 "E-Max") What is the socially optimal level of emissions (choose from one of the following and enter as written without the quotation marks, "E-0". "E"E1 "E-Max").
Imagine a firm's marginal abatement cost function with existing technologies is: MAC = 20 E. If the firm adopts new pollution abatement technologies, its marginal abatement cost function will be: MAC = 100.5E. The adoption costs for the new technology are $4. If the government raises the tax on emissions from $2 to $4, the firm's total costs increase by $ HINT: Total costs include tax payments, total abatement costs, and (if relevant) adoption costs for the new technology. Question 14Select one: a. $20. b. $ 24. c. $10. d. $30.
Please drag and drop the markers 1 through 5 below to denote the appropriate position on the diagram that answers the question. a) Show with marker 1 the efficient level of marginal abatement costs. b) Show with marker 2 the marginal abatement costs if each produce must reduce pollution to 7.5 units. c) Denote with marker 3 the area that measures total abatement costs for each polluter. d) Show with marker 4 the marginal abatement costs if sources 1 and 2 merged and were constrained to a maximum total emissions of 15 units. e) Show with marker 5 the total abatement costs if both sources merged and were constrained to a maximum total emissions of 15 units. Marginal Cost (in dollars) MC MC, Quantity of Emissions Reduced A Source 1 10 5 4 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 O Source 2 5