3. Assume for simplicity that a monopolist has no costs of production and faces a demand curve given by Q = 150 – P (a) Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for this monopolist. Also calculate the monopolisť's profit. (b) Suppose instead that there are two firms in the market facing the demand and cost conditions just described for their identical products. Firms choose quantities simultaneously as in the Cournot model. Compute the outputs in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute market output, price, and firm profits. (c) Suppose the two firms choose prices simultaneously as in the Bertrand model. Compute the prices in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute firm output and profit as well as market output.

3. Assume for simplicity that a monopolist has no costs of production and faces a demand curve given by Q = 150 – P (a) Calculate the profit-maximizing price-quantity combination for this monopolist. Also calculate the monopolisť's profit. (b) Suppose instead that there are two firms in the market facing the demand and cost conditions just described for their identical products. Firms choose quantities simultaneously as in the Cournot model. Compute the outputs in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute market output, price, and firm profits. (c) Suppose the two firms choose prices simultaneously as in the Bertrand model. Compute the prices in the Nash equilibrium. Also compute firm output and profit as well as market output.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Assume that two companies (A and B) are duopolists who produce identical products. Demand for the products is given by the following linear demand function: P=200− Q A − Q B where Q A and Q B are the quantities sold by the respective firms and P is the selling price. Total cost functions for the two companies are TC A =1,500+55 Q A + Q A 2 TC B =1,200+20 Q B +2 Q B 2 Assume that the firms form a cartel to act as a monopolist and maximize total industry profits (sum of Firm A and Firm B profits). In such a case, Company A will produce units and sell at . Similarly, Company B will produce units and sell at . At the optimum output levels, Company A earns total profits of and Company B earns total profits of . Therefore, the total industry profits are . At the optimum output levels, the marginal cost of Company A is and the marginal cost of Company B is . The following table shows the long-run equilibrium if the firms act independently, as in the Cournot model…
Imagine any market divided by 2 Cournot oligopolists who have identical costs Marginal cost = Average cost = 200. About this market, ask yourself: a) If the demand curve for this market is given by Q = 1250 - 2.5P, where Q is the total quantity demanded in the market and P is the selling price, both given in units, what is the reaction curve of the oligopolists? b) What will be the quantity produced and the selling price of the oligopolists? c) A strategist considers that a good marketing campaign would be able to expand the Demand of this market to Q = 1,500 - 2.5P and that in this way, oligopolists could produce the same amount and make significantly greater profits. Such a campaign would generate a reduction in profits in the order of 70,000. Is it worth making this investment in marketing?
Two firms (called firm 1 and firm 2) are the only sellers of a good for which the demand equation is Here, q is the total quantity of the good demanded and p is the price of the good measured in dollars. Neither firm has any fixed costs, and each firm’s marginal cost of producing a unit of goods is $2. Imagine that each firm produces some quantity of goods, and that these goods are sold to consumers at the highest price at which all of the goods can be sold. A Cournot equilibrium in this environment is a pair of outputs (q1, q2) such that, when firm 1 produces q1 units of goods and firm 2 produces q2 units of goods, neither firm can raise its profits by unilaterally changing its output. Find the Cournot equilibrium. Determine whether the price at which the goods are sold exceeds marginal cost.
Question 1. In this question we begin by constructing a competitive market for a good, and then compare the outcome when supply is controlled by a single-price monopolist. Suppose that the demand for units of some beverage comes from households with the preferences over units of the beverage (x1) and expenditure on all other goods (x2) represented by the following utility function, U(x1,x2) = 800 In(x1) + x2 Each household has an exogenous income of I per period. The second 'good' is referred to as a 'composite' good and is an amount of money. We assume throughout that p2 = 1. (4 marks) Derive a household's ordinary demand functions, x1(P1, 1,1) and x2(P1,1,1) when they are price-takers in the market for the beverage. How large does the exogenous income need to be in order for the household to enjoy a positive amount of both 'goods'? i) (2 marks) Suppose there are 80 households who participate in the market for the beverage. Half of the households have an income of $1200 per period,…
A monopoly sells its good in the U.S. and Japanese markets. The American inverse demand function is Pa = 90 - Qa' and the Japanese inverse demand function is P₁ = 80 - 2Qj, where both prices, På and p₁, are measured in dollars. The firm's marginal cost of production is m = $25 in both countries. If the firm can prevent resales, what price will it charge in both markets? (Hint: The monopoly determines its optimal (monopoly) price in each country separately because customers cannot resell the good.) The equilibrium price in Japan is $ (round your answer to the nearest penny) The equilibrium price in the U.S. is $. (round your answer to the nearest penny)
The marginal cost of a product is fixed at MC = 20. The demand for the product is Q = 100 - 2P. (a) Now consider a Cournot model with two firms that are choosing quantities simultaneously. What is the best reply (best response) function for each firm? What is theNash equilibrium? What is the total surplus? (b)What do you expect the total surplus would be with three firms? Why? (You do not need to calculate an exact value. You can say ”total surplus is at least 100”, or ”total surplus is at most 80”)
Please answer all parts...
Additional Problem 3: Assume two companies (C and D) are Cournot duopolists that produce identical products. Demand for the products is given by the following linear demand function: ? = 600 − ?C − ?D where ?C and ?D are the quantities sold by the respective firms and P is the price. Total cost functions for the two companies are ??C= 25,000 +100?C 2 ??D = 20,000 + 125?D c. Determine the equilibrium price and quantities sold by each firm. d.Determine the profits for the market as well as eachfirm.
Suppose that two firms produce a particular (homogeneous) product. The inverse demand function for the product is P = 100 -Q. The firms have marginal cost equal to 10. (a) Derive the Cournot Nash equilibrium quantities, and the corresponding price and profits. Show all work. (b) Suppose that the current price is the Cournot price you derived in part (a). Using the hypothetical monopolist test and assuming a 5% threshold for the test, does the good in question represent an antitrust market? Show all work and explain your answer. There are different ways to answer this question and any correct approach will be accepted. (c) Suppose more generally that marginal cost is equal to c. For what values of c will this product represent an antitrust market? Show your work and explain your answer. Maximum size for new files: 400MB Files
A monopoly sells its good in the U.S. and Japanese markets. The American inverse demand function is Pa = 120-Q₂. and the Japanese inverse demand function is P₁ = 100-2Q₁ where both prices, p, and p,, are measured in dollars. The firm's marginal cost of production is m = $20 in both countries. If the firm can prevent resales, what price will it charge in both markets? (Hint: The monopoly determines its optimal (monopoly) price in each country separately because customers cannot resell the good.) The equilibrium price in Japan is $. (round your answer to the nearest penny)
Suppose the monopolist with a marginal cost of 2 is facing two of customers i = {L, H} with the following demand functions: Customer H: qH Customer L: qL = = 6- PH 4- PL The consumer's total payment T;(q) is T;(q) = A; + piq with lump sum payment A and per unit price p. = a. Assume that the monopolist can distinguish between the two groups of consumers. Further, suppose that A₁ 0, meaning the monopolist is charging uniform prices. Find the profit maximizing price the monopolist charges customer H and the price the monopolist charges customer L. b. Assume that the monopolist can perfectly distinguish between the two groups of consumers and can utilize a lump sum payment A¡ > 0. Find the two part tariff the monopolist charges customer H and the two part tariff charged to customer L.
The marginal cost of a product is fixed at MC = 20. The demand for the product is Q = 100 - 2P. (a) Now consider a Cournot model with two firms that are choosing quantities simultaneously. What is the best reply (best response) function for each firm? What is theNash equilibrium? What is the total surplus? (b)What do you expect the total surplus would be with three firms? Why? (You do not need to calculate an exact value. You can say ”total surplus is at least 100”, or ”total surplus is at most 80”)