LABOR ECONOMICS
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781260004724
Author: BORJAS
Publisher: RENT MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 9, Problem 14P
To determine
Decompose the raw difference in average wages using the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose that a labor economist performs a statistical analysis on economywide worker wages using standard, measurable explanatory factors, such as
job characteristics, years of schooling, and so forth.
How much of the variation in worker wages can be accounted for by such measurable explanatory factors?
Somewhat more than 60%
Nearly 100%
Somewhat less than 50%
About 0%
Which of the following factors are typically omitted from the quantitative analysis of wages but can help explain otherwise unaccounted-for
disparities? Check all that apply.
Chance
Attractiveness
Natural ability
Effort
Race
O O
O O
Can regression be used to estimate the effect of gender on an individual’s earnings?
Question 5 $23 yusine)
Suppose that two wage regressions are estimated for black and white workers:
W₁=5.0+ 0.10S and Ww= 6.0+ 0.145
where S is the number of years of schooling. The average years of schooling for blacks and whites, respectively,
is 12.2 and 13.6 years.
a)
Draw the respective wage profiles for black and white workers on the same graph. Indicate the
raw wage differential for the average black and white worker.
b)
Calculate the Oaxaca decomposition. Indicate on your graph in (a), the portion of the wage
differential attributable to skill differences between white and black workers and the portion due to labor
market discrimination.
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Evaluate the following statement: “In all of the regressions, the coefficienton Female is negative, large, and statistically significant. This provides strongstatistical evidence of sex discrimination in the U.S. labor marketarrow_forwardAssume that we are interested in finding the impact of education on hourly wages, but not in dollar terms, instead in TL terms. Assume that ETL/S= 10. What happens to regression outcomes? 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wage 7. 13.50 15.35 23.12 12 7.70 16.46 7.07 6.04 14.90 Educ Wage TL 16 70 12 135 20 153.50 12 18 12 14 12 12 16 231.20 120 77 164.60 70.70 60.40 149arrow_forward1. Suppose that a pay equity plan has just been put in place in your organization. The pay equity consulting firm did a job evaluation and assigned points to each of the male-dominated and female-dominated jobs. It then estimated the following male and female pay lines by ordinary least squares regression, where Y denotes annual earnings, P denotes job evaluation points, and the subscripts m and f denote male and female respectively: Ym = 5,000 + 100Pm Yf = 4,000 + 80Pf Assume that you were an employee in a female-dominated job and that your job evaluation score was 200. a. What would your pay be before pay equity? 2. In the above example, assume that the average job evaluation score was 300 points in male-dominated jobs and 200 points in female-dominated jobs. Page 387 a. What is the average pay in male-dominated jobs and in female-dominated jobs? b. Use a Oaxaca decomposition to determine the average pay differential between male- and female-dominated jobs into two components: a…arrow_forward
- 8. Using adjusted R-squared to choose between nonnested models Consider the following two models relating wages and education: Model 1 wage = Bo + Bieduc + B2 educ² + u where and R² = 0.393 R2 = 0.048 Model 2 log (wage) Bo + Bieduc + B2 educ² + u where R2 = 0.432 R²= 0.009arrow_forwardReferring to the information provided in the table, what is the adult labor-force participation rate in Meditor? Labor Data for Adults (ages 16 and older) in Meditorarrow_forwarda. Suppose a restaurant hires only women to wait on tables, and only men to cook the food and clean the dishes. Is this most likely to be indicative of employer, employee, consumer, or statistical discrimination? b. The dropout rate of minority and international students at U.S. colleges and universities is higher than it is for white American students. Suppose you strongly believe this is due to discrimination. Is the empirical pattern most likely indicative of employer (college administrations), employee (college faculty and staff), consumer (students), or statistical discrimination?arrow_forward
- A commonly used functional form for wage equations is InW = a + bR + cR2, where W is the annual wage, R is the fatal accident rate, and the other job and employee characteristics are omitted for simplicity. 20 20 1. Derive an expression for the value of a statistical life. 2. Why is it important to include R2 in the wage equation?arrow_forwardIsabelle is working on her real estate analysis project. She is gathering data that would help her figure out trends in demand and supply in the residential housing sector in La Verne. She calculated the Location Quotient for various employment categories, as shown in the table below: Employment industry number of employees in La Verne Number of employees in the USA Transportation 10,000 15,000,000 Education 14,000 19,000,000 Financial 13,000 11,000,000 Health care 7,000 15,000,000 The Location Quotient that Isabelle has calculated for the transportation sector equals: Increase the number of decimal places to, say, 6 or more for any intermediate calculations. Round your answer to TWO decimal places, for example, 1.23arrow_forwardThe following statistic is reported by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: in 2014, women’s average weekly earnings is 83% of men’s average weekly earnings. This statistic is referred to, in the media, as the “gender wage gap”. Possible reasons wages vary among workers, and thus the average weekly earnings for women is different than that of men, include which of the following? a.human capital b.compensating wage differentials c.job search uncertainty d.All of the above.arrow_forward
- Suppose that 15 states decrease the length of the standard work week from 40 to 35 hours. You are interested in the effects of this change on worker productivity. What effects might you expect to see? How would you conduct a difference-in-difference analysis to estimate the impact? What assumption must hold for the difference-in-difference analysis to be valid?arrow_forwardSuppose a researcher is using a panel data set on n = 10,000 workers over T = 20 years (from 2000 through 2019) that contains the workers’ earnings, sex, education, and age. The researcher is interested in the effect of education on earnings. Give some examples of unobserved person-specific variables that are correlated with both education and earnings. Can you think of examples of time-specific variables that might be correlated with education and earnings? How would you control for these person-specific and time-specific effects in a panel data regression?arrow_forwardMP believe that there is a causal relationship between earnings and years of schooling. They show you an estimate of the impact of years of schooling on annual earnings: There are two groups of individuals – group 1 and group 2. Group 1 on average earns £60,000 per year with the average level of post-compulsory education of 6 years, while group 2 earns on average £40,000 with the average post-compulsory education of 4 years. The MPs conclude that the annual return to an additional year of education is 25% using the following equation [(£60,000-£40,000)/40,000]/(6-4)=25%. Ignoring time preferences and discounting, and if both groups face the same cost of schooling, you need to explain to the MPs why this is not a good estimate of the annual return to an additional year of education. Propose methods to the MPs to deal with the problemarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506893
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:Cengage Learning